This morning it was Janice Crouse of Concerned Women for America and her sad attempt to demonize lgbt households by using data having nothing to do with them.
This afternoon, it's Glenn Stanton of Focus on the Family.
The point of annoyance for me is an article in today's USA Today talking about how Hollywood is showing more lgbt characters and families.
Stanton, along with the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer, is quoted as the voices who disagree with this increased visibility.
Now Fischer has a history of making asinine anti-gay comments (which unfortunately the article did not talk about) so there is a paper trail which destroys his credibility as a rational voice on the matter.
But Stanton is a bit more problematic. He tries to make himself sound reasonable but comes across as insulting:
"When actual gay and lesbian weddings are shown on TV (as in news coverage), we win. When they're shown through the lens and creativity and artifice of Hollywood, we don't. Hollywood is succeeding, but they're doing so by not representing reality."
First of all, Stanton's statement is gibberish. Secondly, as far as I know, Stanton is not gay so the question has to be just who is he to decide what is reality when it comes to the lgbt community.
Furthermore, I really don't understand the USA Today can push him as an expert when he has clearly gone on record saying the following:
I don't know of anyone who has referred to me as an "expert" on homosexuality. I have never referred to myself on this, simply because I am not. But I would describe myself as an expert on the issue of same-sex marriage. I have published a book and had many of my articles on the subject republished in numerous mainstream volumes.
I don't mind being critiqued, but at least get it right.
Apparently part of Stanton's "expertise" on same sex marriage is to push inaccurate data on the lgbt community like he did in his piece Why Homosexuality Falls Short of the Ideal.
This piece, Stanton not only cites the work of the discredited Paul Cameron (via secondhand through Thomas Schmidt) but he also says the following:
In addition, because of the extremely high rate of incidence among homosexuals, a group of rare intestinal diseases have been grouped together under the title "gay bowel syndrome."
There is no such thing as "gay bowel sydrome." In the late 70s, there was a belief that there a series of intestinal disorders which was supposedly related to male sexual activity. However as time went on, it was discovered that the problems that made up "gay bowel syndrome" were not specific to homosexuals, not confined to just the bowels, nor did the term itself meet the medical definition of a syndrome.
There are a myriad of cases where this term has been expunged from usage in various places from the New York Times to the National Institutes of Health.
However, people like Stanton, i.e. phony religious right experts, continue to push the term to the ignorant and unassuming.
But that is the crux of the religious right's war on lgbt America. It's not enough for them to have a negative view of the lgbt community. They seek to force that view on society, even if it means beating back the voices of the lgbt community.
It's pretty much the equivalent of allowing a Klansman to dictate the public images of the African-American community.
Hat tip to People for the American Way.