tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33855769.post1202919259367732190..comments2024-03-28T08:03:32.297-07:00Comments on Holy Bullies and Headless Monsters: Hate group exploits Ugandan anti-gay bill to attack press, liberals BlackTsunamihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02349560427762283170noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33855769.post-30317700990460388922012-11-30T06:38:12.522-08:002012-11-30T06:38:12.522-08:00This is an illustration of something vey annoying ...This is an illustration of something vey annoying that seems to be getting more common in America: Jerks like Tony pretending they don't know how language works. Acting like subtelty and innuendo don't exist and that as long as they never explicitly say ____, they never meant ____.<br /><br />That tweet was praising Uganda for killing gay people. That's what he meant, that's how his supporters read it. If he'd actually meant it being about a big public prayer he would have mentioned that prayer in it.<br /><br />However he knows that "Yay for killing gays!" is too honest, that while his fans might eat it up the majority of the country finds it repulsive, so he has to hide the real meaning. He'll blatantly imply something disgusting and offensive, like this post praising Uganda when the only story in the media about Uganda right now is them killiung gays,but as long as he never explicitly saya he wants us dead he can backpedal and claim he was talking about something totally different and the meanie liberals are distorting his words.<br /><br />The presidential campaign was one giant example of this. We all know what they really meant when they called Obama a spearthrowing not-a-real-American welfare queen who doesn't appreciate our anglo-saxon heritage, but as long as they never explicitly say what they really mean they're able to claim that they weren't implying what they were obviously implying.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06610531643668515284noreply@blogger.com