tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33855769.post3970071143970083374..comments2024-03-27T17:40:18.022-07:00Comments on Holy Bullies and Headless Monsters: Boehner's DOMA defense contains junk science, bad sourcesBlackTsunamihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02349560427762283170noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33855769.post-32385039910608935882011-08-23T13:36:57.756-07:002011-08-23T13:36:57.756-07:00I am guessing that none of this material including...I am guessing that none of this material including the underlying studies have been subjected to peer review by a recognized scientific journal. Any lawyer submitting unpublished "studies" should be sanctioned.David Cary Harthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09367643837760744892noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33855769.post-80747401420707174922011-08-23T06:24:35.409-07:002011-08-23T06:24:35.409-07:00I had a class with Prof Dent a few years ago at Ca...I had a class with Prof Dent a few years ago at Case Law. He teaches Corporations law...i repeat, Corporations law, and I actually didn't hate the class despite not really caring for the subject. That said, he appears to spend most of his free time writing about the evils of gay people, for a reason no one seems to know. While I was there (after I had finished class with him of course) he wrote a quick article in the law school newsletter about how "Marriage is not a joke." It was a response to the discussion in Washington State about making marriage only between those who could actually reproduce. I responded with an article the following week where I tore apart his argument and used his own logic to infer that perhaps he was a polygamist among other things that I am sure had him seething. I'd be lying if I didn't admit it had made me a bit nervous, but the overwhelming positive feedback I got from faculty members at Case was quite refreshing. As I said back then, he really should stick to Corporations.Tamarnoreply@blogger.com