Well just because those so-and-so's won't run it doesn't mean that I won't. I found the ad to be an excellent piece:
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
THIS is the DADT repeal ad that Fox News refused to run
Earlier today, I mentioned in my news briefs an article talking about how Fox News refused to run a DADT repeal ad.
Well just because those so-and-so's won't run it doesn't mean that I won't. I found the ad to be an excellent piece:
Well just because those so-and-so's won't run it doesn't mean that I won't. I found the ad to be an excellent piece:
'Ex-gay' group targeting middle school students and other Tuesday midday news briefs
Notorious ‘Ex-Gay Group Plans to Target Middle School Students in 2011 - And they like to claim that we target children.
Fox News rejects ad featuring gay troops discussing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” - And this shocks us because?
PFOX Board Member Cited As Key A Reason The Family Research Council Is a SPLC Certified Hate Group - Sometimes it is about who you know.
NJ Assembly approves tougher bullying law - Excellent!
Fox News rejects ad featuring gay troops discussing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” - And this shocks us because?
PFOX Board Member Cited As Key A Reason The Family Research Council Is a SPLC Certified Hate Group - Sometimes it is about who you know.
NJ Assembly approves tougher bullying law - Excellent!
Bogus study claims that fatherless homes leads to lesbians
In a huge show of audacity, the recently named anti-gay hate group the Family Research Council just came out with a study of its own on the lesbian community. And of course, this "study" has been propped up by another anti-gay hate group the American Family Association via its phony news publication, One News Now:
In keeping with what I said yesterday, I am going to keep this short and sweet.
I wouldn't believe the Klan if they came out with a "study" about African-Americans, so why should I or anyone else believe a study about lgbts by a group who not only has a known bias against lgbts but has been known to play loose with the facts.
It's all about credibility and in this case, the Family Research Council doesn't have any.
However, if you feel so desired to read an excellent take down of this ridiculous piece of work, check out this post by my online buddy, Zach Ford.
A recently released study shows a link between childhood family structure and the rate of female homosexuality -- undermining the claim that sexual orientation is genetic or biological.
Family Research Council (FRC) looked into the family lives and worship rates of 7,643 women between the ages of 14 and 44. Pat Fagan, senior fellow and director of the Marriage and Religion Research Institute at FRC, co-evaluated the data and tells OneNewsNow about the findings.
"Once the girl grows up in a home in which her father is not present, it's about three times" more likely she has had or will have homosexual partners, he says -- but when she is raised by parents who are married and "always intact, it's about a four-percent rate." Moreover, he explains that rate is "slightly higher in the always-intact-but-cohabitating parents -- that's parents who never married."
Statistics are also higher with step-families, the cohabiting step-family, and the single divorced parent, adds the FRC spokesman.
In keeping with what I said yesterday, I am going to keep this short and sweet.
I wouldn't believe the Klan if they came out with a "study" about African-Americans, so why should I or anyone else believe a study about lgbts by a group who not only has a known bias against lgbts but has been known to play loose with the facts.
It's all about credibility and in this case, the Family Research Council doesn't have any.
However, if you feel so desired to read an excellent take down of this ridiculous piece of work, check out this post by my online buddy, Zach Ford.