tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33855769.post6949077070122432796..comments2024-03-28T08:03:32.297-07:00Comments on Holy Bullies and Headless Monsters: 'Religious protection' argument is a dangerous conBlackTsunamihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02349560427762283170noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33855769.post-51445445019458599182013-01-15T09:26:42.831-08:002013-01-15T09:26:42.831-08:00Religious protection means you can't do that s...Religious protection means you can't do that stuff.<br /><br />I know these people are not big on definitions, and that I've even said these words before, but that is literally the exact opposite of what religious liberty is.<br />Those things they want are <i>banned</i> by the First Amendment, not required by it.EvilIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12640387767205137660noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33855769.post-44742358006300338802013-01-15T07:37:08.320-08:002013-01-15T07:37:08.320-08:00“Where exactly is the line drawn when it comes to ...“Where exactly is the line drawn when it comes to "religious protection."”<br /><br />Between the Golden Rule Christians and the get-into-heaven-free-card christians.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15741631418494590847noreply@blogger.com