Saturday, August 13, 2011

The dangers of not challenging false anti-gay testimony are numerous

This is the last of  a series of posts highlighting the need for Congress to scrutinize misleading religious right testimony during its hearings. The first post today showed of Maggie Gallagher gave misleading testimony  during an earlier DOMA hearing this year. The second post showed how Tony Perkins gave misleading testimony during a Congressional hearing on ENDA in 2009. Now this post demonstrates just how dangerous it is to allow testimony like this to go unchallenged.

To put it simply, via ThinkProgress, when lies about the lgbtq community go unchallenged during Congressional hearings, you will find Congressional leaders repeating these lies as reasons to vote against gay equality.

The following words are during a 1996 debate on DOMA. While you view this footage, ask yourself just how much of it have you heard coming from the mouths of Tony Perkins, Peter Sprigg, and the rest of that bunch:





Sign the petition to keep injustices like this from happening.


Bookmark and Share

1 comment:

  1. Donny D.9:35 PM

    I don't remember precisely what was said against us during the 1993 congressional hearings that led to Don't Ask, Don't Tell, but I'd be surprised if it wasn't fertile ground for material of this kind. It seemed to me that LGB people were specifically kept from having any influence in the process that gave us DADT. It seemed as though everyone but us had a say in what was to be done with us in the military.

    ReplyDelete