Yesterday, the Southern Baptist Convention recently elected its first African-American president.
From The Washington Post:
I would probably applaud the SBC except for the following from The Associated Press:
So let me get this correct. An organization (the Southern Baptist Convention) which started over the question of slavery - it was for it - and was heavily segregated during the Civil Rights Movement has now its first black leader and but is also presently thinking about passing a resolution accusing gays of misappropriating the rhetoric of the Civil Rights Movement; a movement started in part because folks like the people in the Southern Baptist Convention justified the treating of black people as inferiors.
The irony boggles the mind, but it does justify an old saying.
You can't put a new auto body around a crappy engine and expect it to perform.
From The Washington Post:
When the Southern Baptist Convention met Tuesday, it elected its first African American president, Fred Luter Jr., a former street preacher and current pastor of a church in New Orleans’ Lower Ninth Ward.
Luter’s election marks a watershed moment for the SBC. The organization was founded in a split over slavery before the Civil War and for decades was a largely segregated, all-white denomination. It was not until 1995 that the organization adopted a resolution of racial reconciliation; it has come under scrutiny for racial insensitivity as recently as the Trayvon Martin case, when the president of its policy arm made racially charged comments about the case.
But the election of Luter will not be, at least primarily, about fixing the sins of the past. Rather, it will be about the future of an organization that has seen declining membership for five straight years. The denomination—the largest Protestant body in the United States—will need to seek new growth from urban centers and minority groups, or at the very least, maintain its size by helping struggling churches find ways to stay afloat. “I think they thought racial diversity would happen,” Ed Stetzer, the president of the SBC’s research organization, told the Associated Press. “Now they realize they have to make it happen,” he said.
I would probably applaud the SBC except for the following from The Associated Press:
A day after electing their first African-American president, Southern Baptists were considering a resolution Wednesday opposing the idea that gay rights are the same as civil rights.
The resolution up for a vote at the denomination's annual meeting in New Orleans affirms Southern Baptists' beliefs that marriage is "the exclusive union of one man and one woman" and that "all sexual behavior outside of marriage is sinful."
It acknowledges that gays and lesbians sometimes experience "unique struggles" but declares that they lack the "distinguishing features of classes entitled to special protections."
"It is regrettable that homosexual rights activists and those who are promoting the recognition of 'same-sex marriage' have misappropriated the rhetoric of the Civil Rights Movement," the resolution states.
So let me get this correct. An organization (the Southern Baptist Convention) which started over the question of slavery - it was for it - and was heavily segregated during the Civil Rights Movement has now its first black leader and but is also presently thinking about passing a resolution accusing gays of misappropriating the rhetoric of the Civil Rights Movement; a movement started in part because folks like the people in the Southern Baptist Convention justified the treating of black people as inferiors.
The irony boggles the mind, but it does justify an old saying.
You can't put a new auto body around a crappy engine and expect it to perform.
wow that is insane.
ReplyDeleteYour Blogs are always great information to reed every time i see one i reed it.
You know it's interesting that it's not just the SBC that's lost adherents over the last five years. Virtually EVERY Chritian sect or cult has lost members including the Catholics.
ReplyDeletein essence, a group of bigots want to tell people what civil rights are. These people aren't republicans by any chance?
ReplyDeleteFortunately these people don't sit on the SCOTUS, have no bearing on the law and are constantly being proven WRONG with facts, science, and reason. PFFFFFFFFFFFFFt.
ReplyDelete