Simple question. If the Family Research Council's opposition to lgbt equality is rooted in Biblical foundation rather than animus, why does the organization distort scientific data to attack the lgbt community.
On the FRC webpage is an original "study" entitled
Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse. This piece of "work" was published by former FRC employee Timothy Dailey.
It puts forth the theory that:
Pedophiles are invariably males: Almost all sex crimes against children are committed by men.
Significant numbers of victims are males: Up to one-third of all sex crimes against children are committed against boys (as opposed to girls).
The 10 percent fallacy: Studies
indicate that, contrary to the inaccurate but widely accepted claims of
sex researcher Alfred Kinsey, homosexuals comprise between 1 to 3
percent of the population.
Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals
from the 1 to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to
the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against
children.
Some homosexual activists defend the historic connection between homosexuality and pedophilia: Such activists consider the defense of "boy-lovers" to be a legitimate gay rights issue.
Pedophile themes abound in homosexual literary culture: Gay fiction as well as serious academic treatises promote "intergenerational intimacy."
These points are junk. More credible sources, i.e. the American Psychological Association, the
National Association of Social Workers, the American Academy of Child
Psychiatrists and the Child Welfare League of America, all say that gay
men are not more likely to molest children than heterosexual men.