Freedom to Marry's Evan Wolfson debated the National Organization for Marriage's Brian Brown yesterday on NYC's WABC 7 and annihilated his arguments. It's like I have been saying before. Our side speaks truth from the heart while Brown's side speaks like robots programmed with talking points. This is better than sex and chocolate.
And in other news:
CNN's Roland S. Martin apologizes via Twitter for Super Bowl Tweets that angered LGBT community - Mr. Martin should look at this as a cultural lesson. I know many African-Americans who got incensed on a personal level at the photo of Arizona governor Jan Brewer putting her finger in President Obama's face. In the case of the lgbtq community, words advocating violence against the lgbtq community gets us incensed, no matter how lighthearted they were meant to be. But now that we are on the subject, how about more lgbtqs of color on your show, Roland . . . .
New York City Council Balks At Resolution Endorsing Churches In Public Schools - I can just hear the whines about "religious liberty" now.
No surprise: NC anti-gay Pastor Patrick Wooden pimps his ‘life-earned,’ non-academic doctorate - Well, well, well, the "diaper pastor" Patrick Wooden has false credentials. He should fit right in with the religious right on that score.
REPORT: 16 Million Employees Could Receive Nondiscrimination Protections From Executive Order - Go for it, Mr. President!
Sorry, Alvin.. I don't do videos Our hearing impaired LGBT cannot share.
ReplyDeletePlease transcribe salient points.
great....does this mean that i get to decide if my neighbours get to marry each other then?.....oh and another point.,...is this so called vote going to seperate church from state?.....cuz if thats the case then most of the marriages i know of are in some deep trouble
ReplyDeleteHow about the Federal Government get out of the Marriage biz and hands out just the LEGAL certificate a civil union that has all the rights and responsibility of marriage on the state and federal level, and individual church can decide who can and cannot get married at their church that way the first amendment is upheld as a division of church and state. Because as marriage as it is defined is a religious institution. Churches need to be reminded that they do not grant the rights of marriage only the ceremony.
ReplyDeleteLilith... that is how it works.
ReplyDeleteNote that "marriage" and "union" actually mean the same thing.