The Family Research Council dishonestly defends Trump's banned word list

Family Research Council head Tony Perkins and his group applauds Trump banning words.

To the surprise of no one who has followed the pseudo-Christian organization, the Family Research Council is applauding the Trump Administration's banning of seven words and phrases ("vulnerable," "diversity," "entitlement," "transgender," "fetus," "evidence-based," and "science-based.") for use by the Centers for Disease Control and other government agencies in official budget documents.

In fact, FRC calls it "standard procedure" and a move to "bring the country back to reality"

For once, it's not what the Trump administration is saying that's raising the media's eyebrows -- it's what they aren't saying. Heading into the weekend, the Washington Post sparked an interesting debate over the power of words when it reported that officials at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) were asked to avoid certain terms in their budget requests. 

The Post treated the news as if it were an unusual -- and even troubling -- development. Among the taboos, reporters write worriedly, are words like "diversity," "transgender," "entitlement," "fetus," "evidence-based," and "science-based." As usual, the liberal media ginned up plenty of outrage over the changes, despite the fact that this is a standard practice of every administration. President Obama understood better than anyone that if you control the language, you control the debate. In fact, we've watched the far Left use this strategy for years on everything from religious liberty to life. "Abortion" became a "choice." "Liberals" are "progressives." And suddenly, it's not "same-sex marriage" but "marriage equality."

Framing the debate has always been one of the biggest turf wars in politics. Obama chose his rhetoric carefully, enlisting the politically-correct media to help. And ironically, no one batted an eye. When he changed terms and rules unilaterally, there was no uproar in the mainstream press. They simply accepted it as the administration's prerogative. Now, with a conservative in the White House, it's suddenly news that Republicans would want the agencies to use the conservative lexicon. In this case, swapping out words like "fetus" for "unborn child" more accurately reflects the president's ideology and agenda. Tone and lingo change with every administration. Why it's a headline now is anyone's guess. 

Health and Human Services (HHS) spokesman Matt Lloyd called the "controversy" a "complete mischaracterization of discussions regarding the budget formulation process." Ultimately, the CDC is doing with language what President Trump has done with policy: bringing the country back to reality. The media wants to act like the swinging pendulum of the Obama years only sways one way. But that's not how democracy works. This is the return to normalcy Americans voted for -- a change in how we view the world that's in line with most people's core values. If the Left doesn't like it, it's up to them to persuade the country otherwise!

In spite of FRC's "all is well" semantics about the situation, people are alarmed over it, as they should be.  Sen. Pat Murray  and Rep. Frank Pallone Jr. sent a letter earlier today to acting Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Eric Hargan, calling the Trump Administration's decision  "a clear message that the Trump Administration is yet again prioritizing ideology over science."

In defending what the Trump Administration did, FRC seems to have no problem displaying its lack of integrity. The group conveniently omits that its interests are served well by the elimination of some of those words and phrases.

To whit, of course FRC would applaud the banning of the word "transgender." Part of its agenda is the undermining of the transgender community. The organization also wants to eliminate abortions, so it also helps matters for the word "fetus" to be banned. And pay attention to how FRC gins up the words and phrases  "normalcy" and "core values" while rooting for the banning of words such as "science-based" and "evidence-based."

One wonders what reality is FRC hoping for by banning phrases like "evidence-based" and "science-based."

I doubt it's a Christian reality. It's certainly not an American one, either.