Thursday, September 04, 2025

'Trump DOJ reportedly looking to ban trans Americans from owning guns' & other Thur/Fri news briefs



Trump DOJ Reportedly Looking to Ban Trans Americans From Owning Guns​ - I am NOT a fan of guns, but I do understand the need of them for the sake of protection. But this goes BEYOND gun ownership. This is yet another instance in which the Trump administration is scapegoating trans people in an attempt to distract its base. Regardless of how anyone feels about trans people or trans rights, we need to recognize and call out the Trump Administration's eagerness to openly wage war against this group of Americans. 

Trans Americans aren't the bullies or the problem. The Trump Administration is. And from some of the responses I've been reading, a lot of pro-gun folks aren't happy with this. They feel that if trans people can be banned from owning guns, it would make things easier to ban other groups from owning guns. 

From the article:
 
The DOJ is reportedly looking at ways to designate transgender people as mentally ill and therefore ineligible to exercise their Second Amendment rights, one Justice official told CNN. 
“The vast majority of mass attacks in the US have no connection to transgender people,” the report stated, “Still, after the deadly shooting last week, some conservative allies of the president quickly claimed that gender dysphoria – the psychological distress and discomfort some people feel when there’s a difference between their sex assigned at birth and their gender identity – is a mental illness that should bar citizens from purchasing a firearm.” 
A 2023 report by the U.S. Secret Service National Threat Association Center found that from 2016 to 2020, 96% of shooters were men, 3% women, and 2% transgender. 


Tucker Carlson wants to ask Pete Buttigieg “very specific questions about gay sex” - Uh hell no. Every level and angle of this narrative makes me ill. 


  How the Supreme Court’s conversion therapy case could reshape LGBTQ+ protections across America - Not to mention how far the court is willing go to in a direction which weaponizes the idea of "religious freedom."