Tuesday, July 23, 2013

To defeat ENDA, expect anti-gay groups to use same-old framework of propaganda and lies


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Tuesday, July 23, 2013
Contact: Alvin McEwen
Phone: 803-447-4874



To defeat ENDA, expect anti-gay groups to use same-old framework of propaganda and lies
 
 
If passed into law,” says (Americans for Truth about Homosexuality head Peter) LaBarbera, “ENDA would not only impact businesses, but also homosexuals and other gender-confused people could work as teachers and influence children to accept their lifestyle.

How many of you would feel comfortable dropping off your kids in a school that encouraged faculty cross-dressing? At least three Senate Republicans would. Today, those leaders -- Sens. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), and Lisa Murkowski (R-Ak.) -- threw their support behind a bill that would force sexual confusion on almost every classroom, day care, and summer camp in America. Insisting the legislation is just a harmless little "anti-prejudice" bill, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee voted 15-7 to make employees' bedroom habits a preeminent consideration in hiring, firing, and promotion decisions – Family Research Council email


COLUMBIA - Recently, the Senate began consideration of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA). This burst of progress has redoubled the efforts of anti-gay opponents. And, as author Alvin McEwen notes, they’re ready to double -down on their rhetoric.

“Anti-gay groups are already conjuring up images of drag queens teaching in nurseries, men invading women’s restrooms, and Christians being led away in handcuffs because of ENDA,” McEwen said. “The sad thing is that people take them seriously because they are fooled that these are legitimate concerns. But they aren’t. They are merely part of a very old framework of propaganda and lies dating back to the 70s and 80s.”

McEwen is an expert in tracking the rhetoric of the anti-gay industry via his blog Holy Bullies and Headless Monsters. In January, he created an online booklet spotlighting anti-gay propaganda and instead of refuting anti-gay distortions, he allowed the propaganda to refute itself. The booklet,
How They See Us: Unmasking the Religious Right War on Gay America, is a simple, graphics- intensive project whose aim, according to McEwen, seeks to show how anti-gay rhetoric is dangerous to the American discourse.
 
“Over the past several decades, the anti-gay groups have been successfully creating a complex framework of propaganda which stigmatizes the gay community as dreaded outsiders out to indoctrinate children, destroy American values, and imprison Christians,” McEwen said. “Until we address these lies and how they are hidden behind the facade of religious beliefs, our success will not be total. And, we’re going to see these lies in overdrive over the next weeks and months.”
 
A key part of How They See Us involved spotlighting images from a 1986 anti-gay comic book entitled Deathstyle. Deathstyle sought to show the so-called dangers of the so-called “homosexual lifestyle” through stereotypes brought to life via an artist’s pen. Back then, it was a major project which was endorsed by anti-gay groups such as Concerned Women for America and a California Congressman, William Dannemeyer.
 
However, a look at the various cartoons in Deathstyle today would most likely elicit laughs in terms of how stereotypically caricatured and outdated they are. That is, until McEwen compares them with the present-day rhetoric pushed by anti-gay groups.
 
“Showing people a ludicrously drawn picture of an oversexed gay man looking to molest a child would garner many laughs,” McEwen said, “that is until readers looked on the other side of the page and read comments from someone like Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council making the same accusation in the present, albeit in a more sedated tone. It’s not so funny then.”
 
In addition, McEwen also demonstrates how anti-gay group such as the Family Research Council distort information from the Centers of Disease Control to falsely denigrate the lgbt identity as dangerous.  He also lists 11 different examples of professors, researchers, and Ph.D.s who have complained over the years that their work have either been distorted or taken out of context by anti-gay groups.
 
And with Congressional discussions about the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) beginning soon, How They See Us is definitely timely.  How They See Us is available on Scribd and can be read or downloaded free of charge. 

'Anti-gay group attacking six-year-old transgender child' and other Tuesday midday news briefs

The hosts of the View skewers candidate's homophobia

From Think Progress:

The hosts of The View ridiculed Virginia Republican gubernatorial candidate Ken Cuccinelli for his push to reinstate the state’s Crimes Against Nature law on Monday, a measure that would make felons out of consenting married couples who engage in oral or anal sex in the privacy of their own homes. The act was struck down by federal courts after Cuccinelli blocked efforts to bring it in line with the Supreme Court’s 2003 Lawrence v. Texas ruling:

Monday, July 22, 2013

'Illinois hate group launches ugly attack against same-sex families' and other Monday midday news briefs



 Illinois Equality Opponents: Homosexuality is A ‘Tyrannical, Oppressive, Poisonous Cultural Force’ - Just plain nasty. And desperate. 

Ken Cuccinelli: Gays And Lesbians Still 'Harmful To Society' - What's worse than a homophobe? A consistent homophobe.

Known Exorcist Testifies Against Massachusetts Bill To Ban ‘Ex-Gay’ Therapy - I'm sure THAT'S going to go well.

San Diego County Clerk Asks Court to Block Gay Marriage - Funny how when the Prop 8 vote went their way, opponents of marriage equality chided the lgbt community for not accepting the vote. Yet another notch in the belt of hypocrisy.

NOM's Maggie Gallagher caught in a huge lie about 'ex-gay' therapy

Maggie Gallagher
One of the most annoying qualities of National Organization for Marriage former head Maggie Gallagher is how pathetically transparent she is when it comes to lying.

Last week is a perfect example. On July 15, she made the following statement in the National Review:

Chuck Limandri, my old friend from the Carrie Prejean, Prop 8 fights, is a heckuva a lawyer and one brave man. He’s taking on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s massive legal machine to defend the right of Jewish gay people to seek help:
“If SPLC wins this landmark legal case, it will communicate to gays and lesbians seeking to conform their sexual lives to Torah values that they are second-class citizens, without the same right to seek help that other gay people enjoy,” said Limandri.
SPLC is using consumer-fraud laws to try to bankrupt these small nonprofits and if it wins this case has announced plans to take it nationwide against 70 groups offering some form of sexual-orientation-change efforts. They must not want publicity because this landmark case is flying under all media radar screens.

Limandri is defending a Jewish ex-gay therapy group, JONAH from a lawsuit by the Southern Poverty Law Center for consumer fraud. By her statement, Gallagher was giving support not only to JONAH but the practice of ex-gay or "reparative" therapy.

Doing this contradicts not only her but NOM's talking points that they are merely attempting to protect marriage.

So what did Gallagher do to cover up her inadvertent comment? She lied like a rug. In the July 18th edition of National Review, she said the following:

My last NRO post on Chuck Limandri and the ConscienceDefense.org case he will argue tomorrow in court in Jersey City has generated predictable headlines in the gay/left press that I’m now backing “conversion therapy.” I don’t back something called “conversion therapy.”  I don’t even really know what conversion therapy is, and I’m not qualified to express an opinion on a particular kind of therapy.

I back the right of gay people to seek the kind of counseling help they want, not the kind the SPLC lawyers want them to have, including help to live their sexual lives with integrity, according to their own values, not the SPLC’s values. That’s all.

And there is the immature quality of lying in the face of insurmountable proof. According to Equality Matters:

Gallagher is lying. In 2001, she wrote an article for Townhall.com explicitly calling for more federal funding for research into "ex-gay" therapy, calling homosexuality "a sexual dysfunction":

Dr. Robert L. Spitzer is a brave man.

He was a brave man back in 1973 when, as a member of the American Psychiatric Association's Task Force on Nomenclature, he met with gay activists. As a result of his intervention, the APA, while rejecting the argument that homosexuality is "a normal variant of human sexuality," agreed it "does not necessarily constitute a disorder."

He was an even braver man this week when he reported the results of a new study of 200 "ex-gays": "(S)ome people can change from gay to straight, and we ought to acknowledge that," as he told the Associated Press.

Furthermore, in the first National Review post regarding the JONAH lawsuit, Gallagher bragged about being chairman of Limandri's group. Surely she must have known about the lawsuit beforehand.

Finally, how could Gallagher not know a thing about reparative therapy when her group, NOM issued support of JONAH in the lawsuit on its blog with language and tone almost similar to what Gallagher used in her National Review post:

On Friday my friend and hero Chuck LiMandri (who was one of the first to help us get Prop 8 on the ballot!) will be in court in New Jersey, taking on the goliath Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and its new militant attempt to misuse consumer fraud laws to attack a small Jewish nonprofit named JONAH that helps observant Jews with same-sex attraction live according to the Bible's laws.

This is one of the hugest stories you've never been told by the media: the SPLC wants to use its $250 million budget and 7 full-time staff lawyers to bankrupt therapists, counselors, and religious nonprofits that offer help to people with unwanted same-sex attraction. And they are misusing "consumer fraud" statutes to do it.

I suspect SPLC picked a Jewish service organization first because they were hoping many of us in the Christian community would ignore it. But whatever you think about sexual orientation, it's wrong to tell people they can't ask for help to live their sexual lives as they choose, not as the SPLC's lawyers want them to do.

It's Gallagher's incredible audacity to tell a blatant lie in the face of so much contradictory evidence which has led many to see NOM for the fraudulent organization that it is.

So I say, keep it up, Maggie! Keep it up!

Friday, July 19, 2013

Know Your LGBT History - Gays in Film

Let's play a game. How many of the following movies can you name. Feel free to list them in the comment section. A special no-prize goes to those who can name which ones were Oscar nominees/winners:


 

Past Know Your LGBT History Posts:

'Religious right spokesperson - Disney Channel is dangerous because it shows gay parents' and other Friday midday news briefs

Porter: Disney Channel Unsafe for Kids Because of Lesbian Moms - Cause apparently Disney showing same-sex parenting is the next phase in our plan to take over America, make Judy Garland's birthday a national holiday, or whatever . . . 

Matt Barber: Parents of trans kids should be tried for child abuse - When people ask why do I give attention to the madness of the religious right, I tell them because it makes my job easier. Letting them hang themselves keeps me from getting rope burn.

National Organization For Marriage Defends Ex-Gay Therapy As A Religious Liberty - A key part of this story? After backing "ex-gay" therapy earlier this week, Maggie Gallagher is doing a moonwalk worthy of the late Michael Jackson. 

 NOM Embraces Group Being Sued For Cruel, Degrading Forms Of "Ex-Gay" Therapy - And THIS is the ex-gay therapy NOM is supporting.  

Eugene Delgaudio Finally Disciplined By Loudoun County Board of Supervisors - Using taxpayer money for private anti-gay activities? This one bears looking at.