Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Trump, Republicans, Social Security and . . . transgender drag queens?


This is completely tongue-in-cheek, but the sad thing is probably how many of you will probably beg me not to give Trump and the Republicans any ideas.

 And how it might be a good idea to take your request seriously.

Monday, February 17, 2025

Second judge pauses Trump's EO against gender-affirming care for trans kids


It's been my experience that the Trump Administration's strikes against the LGBTQ community are announced with much fanfare, but when they collapse in the face of court rulings, folks don't seem to be paying that much attention. We saw this in his first term when three judges struck down his administration's attempt to create a "healthcare conscience rule" which would have been used to deny LGBTQ Americans adequate healthcare. 

And we are seeing it now with his executive order banning federal support of gender-affirming care for trans youth. 

From the Associated Press two days ago:

A second federal judge on Friday paused President Donald Trump’s executive order halting federal support for gender-affirming care for transgender youth under 19. U.S. District Court Judge Lauren King granted a temporary restraining order after the Democratic attorneys general of Washington state, Oregon and Minnesota sued the Trump administration last week. Three doctors joined as plaintiffs in the suit, which was filed in the Western District of Washington. 

 The decision came one day after a federal judge in Baltimore temporarily blocked the executive order in response to a separate lawsuit filed on behalf of families with transgender or nonbinary children. Judge Brendan Hurson’s temporary restraining order will last 14 days but could be extended and essentially puts Trump’s directive on hold while the case proceeds. Hurston and King were both appointed by former President Joe Biden.

 Trump signed an executive order last month halting federal funding for institutions that provide the care and directing federally run insurance programs, including Medicaid and TRICARE for military families, to exclude coverage for it. The order also calls on the Department of Justice to pursue litigation and legislation to oppose it. 

 From CBS News

 The president's directive, issued in his first week in office, threatens research and education grants awarded to medical institutions that provide gender-affirming care to patients under the age of 19. Treatments covered by the order include puberty blockers, hormone therapy and surgical procedures. The Democrat-led states that sued the Trump administration over the order said it deprives transgender youth of life-saving medical care. They called it a "cruel and baseless broadside against transgender youth, their families, and the doctors and medical institutions that provide them this critical care." 

 "It is an official statement of bigotry from the president that directs agencies to openly discriminate against vulnerable youth on the basis of their transgender status and sex," state officials wrote in their lawsuit. "It is also a blatant abuse of power. The order usurps spending and legislative powers belonging exclusively to Congress, and seizes the States' historic police powers to regulate the practice of medicine in violation of the Tenth Amendment."

Wednesday, February 12, 2025

Monday, February 10, 2025

Video - A brief timeline of Black Gay History in America

     

Folks, it doesn't matter what Donald Trump, or any conservative Republican says. It doesn't matter what any right-wing fool with a Twitter address says.  And (I'm going to have to go there), the same goes for certain gay white men who try to omit LGBTQ people of color out of history. 

Black history and LGBTQ identity are not two separate entities. The two have intertwined several times throughout history and this country is much better for it. No law, executive order, or silly collegiate argument can erase what's in the blood of America. 

That's us.

Wednesday, February 05, 2025

''Stunt queen' Nancy Mace throws a transphobic hissy fit on the House floor' & other Wed/Thur news briefs

Nancy Mace has pulled more stunts in Congress than Elizabeth Taylor and Zsa Zsa Gabor had husbands.

Nancy Mace repeatedly shouts anti-trans slur in House hearing: 'I don't really care‘​ - Nancy Mace's desire to attack the trans community for the sake of fundraising leads to her again making a huge fool of herself. This time, it's on the House floor. Some folks on the right are trying to spin her repeated use of an anti-trans slur as courageous but they should ask themselves what if it was a slur against Jewish people, Black people, or any other group? Whatever the case may be, Mace relies on the trans community so much for her notoriety and income that I think every trans person in America should list her as a dependent on their tax returns.

Nancy Mace has made a fool of herself several times while targeting the trans community:





 
In other news:

Trump signs executive order banning trans women from women’s sports - And speaking of other folks dependent on the trans community, Trump just issued another useless executive order against the trans community. In reality, Trump cannot ban trans women from sports by decree, however his administration can make things a bit more difficult. This EO is meant to make Trump look good to his supporters (which really isn't impossible. Trump could dive in a pool of pig crap and his supporters would applaud him) and scare the trans community. This isn't about protecting women's sports (notice how no one talks about trans men in sports). It's simply about scapegoating an innocent group for credibility. 

 On that note - All of the anti-trans executive orders Trump has signed - The attack on trans Americans is also a distraction while Trump and his cronies wage war against women's right to adequate healthcare. Nancy Mace would stand against this if it was politically advantageous for her. But no doubt she feels she can get better headlines by helping Trump create trans boogeymen and women.

What can trans people do about Trump’s executive orders? Be plaintiffs, says Lambda Legal - But trans folks can fight this madness, and I suspect that they will. 

Also:


Tuesday, February 04, 2025

Proud Boys lose their trademark name to a Black church after court judgement

A little bit of karma to make you smile. Trump may be back (God help us) but it looks like the Proud Boys aren't going to be with him.

From The Huffington Post:

A Black church in Washington, D.C., now owns the “Proud Boys” trademark after a judge stripped it from the right-wing group in a judgment Monday. The ruling gives the Metropolitan African Methodist Episcopal Church complete control over the group’s name and symbols, including the ability to monetize them as they see fit. 

 Judge Tanya Jones Bosier of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia awarded the trademark after the group failed to pay a $2.8 million default judgment given in 2023 when they didn’t show up in court. Should the church so choose, it’s now free to sell, transfer and license the Proud Boys trademark, including a black and yellow wreath logo with “PB” in the middle. Proud Boys chapters across the country can no longer use the name or iconography either, unless granted approval by the church.

. . .Church leaders filed suit after Proud Boys members vandalized the house of worship during a violent Dec. 12, 2020, “Million MAGA March” in support of Donald Trump after he lost the presidential election that year.


For those who aren't aware, the Proud Boys is a creepy, homophobic, racist group which associated itself with Donald Trump during his first term in office.

I personally think the group has some homoerotic tendencies. Its founder and former leader, Gavin McInnes, shoved a dildo up his own rear to supposedly prove that he wasn't homophobic. 

Or something like that.

Related posts:

Moms For Liberty deny affiliation with extremist hate group The Proud Boys, but pictures and links tell another story




Monday, February 03, 2025

Several school systems say they will defy Donald Trump's anti-Black, anti-LGBTQ executive order

Donald Trump's executive order attacking the visibility of Black and LGBTQ students isn't getting as much attention in the media as it should. But at least someone is covering it. Last year's GLAAD Media Award winner (in the category of Outstanding Blog) Erin Reed is finding out some very positive things about it. Apparently, school systems across the nation are saying that they will defy Trump.

On Thursday, Julie Yang, President of the Montgomery County Board of Education in Maryland, issued a forceful response to Trump’s executive order in a mass email to families. Representing a school district of 160,000 students, Yang affirmed that Montgomery County would continue to recognize gender identity as a protected characteristic. “We stand by our community and school system values, which include learning, relationships, respect, excellence, and equity. They guide us every day and anchor us when navigating difficult times. We intend to use all legal means necessary to uphold them… We are committed to maintaining local authority over our curriculum, teaching, and learning. And we will fiercely support our teachers and staff as they implement our curriculum and policies.” 

 Harrisonburg City Public Schools Superintendent Michael Richards also issued a strong response to Trump’s executive order. The district was one of three specifically named in the order for its policies supporting transgender students. In his statement, Richards pushed back forcefully, saying, “The claims in their statement are false. We do not have a policy that violates anyone’s rights or indoctrinates children. What we do have is a culture of respect—one that honors the dignity and diversity of all students, families, and educators.”

San Francisco Unified School District also responded to Trump’s executive order, affirming that it would continue to embrace its diversity as a core strength. “This includes our district’s trans-identified students and all of our LGBTQ+ students and families,” the statement read. The district made clear that its core values would not change, emphasizing its commitment to supporting all students’ rights, including “addressing students using the name and pronoun that reflects who they are” and “providing access to school activities, spaces such as locker rooms and restrooms, and gender-neutral dress codes that fit with their gender identity.”

There are several others included. Let me give some kudos to Reed for doing what the mainstream media isn't doing in devoting suitable time to our issues. Reed's emphasis dealt with how schools are standing with trans students, but it doesn't take a palm reader to tell that these schools are with the other communities - LGB and Black students - who Trump is targeting.

In addition, Amanda Marcotte of the online site Salon is predicting that Trump's executive order could backfire. She points out, first of all, that his threat to take away funding from schools who go against his executive order has very little power:

As Dana Goldstein at the New York Times reports, "States and localities provide 90 percent of the funding for public education — and have the sole power to set curriculums, tests, teaching methods and school-choice policies." What federal funding exists "goes out to states in a formula set by Congress, and the president has little power to restrict its flow." State and local officials in blue states and cities are already telling Trump where to shove his executive order.

Marcotte also said:

 . . . As I learned covering a school curriculum fight swing county in suburban Pennsylvania in 2023, parents will often put up an extraordinary fight to wrest control back from right-wing ideologues. It's not because they're "woke" and want to "indoctrinate" children with leftist ideals. Many of these parents were not especially political people, especially compared to their conservative opponents, who were rabidly ideological. Their concerns were kids having a real education and a safe environment to learn in. I didn't get the sense that parents were overly worried their kids would be "indoctrinated" by the right-wing propaganda that Republicans were pushing on the school district. Instead, they were worried about what kids weren't learning if teachers were wasting time with fake lessons about a MAGA fantasy of the past.