Wednesday, October 22, 2025

Oops! Inaccurate birth certificate proves how anti-trans policies can harm student athletes


Some of us told folks that these anti-trans policies would have unintended consequences. 

From LGBTQNation: 

 In Arizona last week, a cisgender male 8th grader was “physically removed” from tryouts for his school’s boys’ basketball team because an error on his original birth certificate incorrectly identified him as being born female. It’s the latest episode in a “gender ideology”-inspired nightmare for the teenager, Laker Jackson, and his family. 

 . . . The Kafkaesque drama was inspired by a clerical mistake 14 years ago, when hospital staff mistakenly identified Becky Jackson’s newborn son as a girl. It was an error Laker’s parents never noticed. I give him the birth certificate and they’re like, ‘Did you know this says female?’” Becky Jackson recalled about handing over enrollment paperwork to a school administrator last year. “I was like, ‘What?’” Becky Jackson said. “I was like, ‘Oh man, that’s so funny.’ So we come home, everyone’s laughing.” The busy mom of six said correcting the document wasn’t a priority. 

 “So we just put it in the drawer and moved on,” she said. The mix-up didn’t cause issues until recently, she told AZ Family. Last spring, school staff began treating Jackson as female, Becky Jackson said. The district removed Laker Jackson from an all-boys gym class and mandated he use a separate restroom, despite the family’s assertion that their son is a cisgender boy, assigned male at birth. Becky’s mom had already started work on changing Laker Jackson’s birth certificate, but “it’s not something that you can fix quickly. You have to have an affidavit signed,” she said.

 In the meantime, the 14-year-old continued training to make the boys’ basketball team at his Mesa high school, a 7th to 12th-grade school in the Queen Creek Unified School District. Becky Jackson said she received the corrected birth certificate over the summer and provided the district with the revised document, along with a doctor’s note confirming Laker’s sex. 

 But Queen Creek administrators said it wasn’t enough, standing by a rule stating that the school’s determination of a student’s sex would rely solely on an original birth certificate. 

According to Jackson, this caused her son to be physically removed from basketball tryouts in front of his teammates. The article goes on to say:

 . . .The ordeal is a prime example of what activists have long warned: that anti-trans policies are bad for everyone. It’s also quite ironic, considering the very people who want to stop anyone assigned male at birth from playing on girls’ sports teams may wind up forcing a cisgender boy to do just that.


This situation is a perfect opportunity give a little critique of my LGBTQ community.

Our problem is we aren't petty enough. I don't mean petty to each other. We tend to be that way for days on end. What I am talking about is being petty to those who oppose our basic equality. The anti-LGBTQ industry has done so many ugly things to us - smearing our names, dehumanizing our families, and trying to gaslight us to death - that we've become desensitized to their actions.

Desensitization of those constantly endangering your safety and equality can be seen as a good coping mechanism designed to protect yourself from psychological harm, but it has its drawbacks. A major one is underappreciating the times when the actions of those attempting to steal your rights away either backfire or cause harm to members of the general public.

I've been blogging for over 19 years, so I've witnessed anti-LGBTQ activists, and religious right groups make a large amount of embarrassing public mistakes due to their stridency. But generally, they are able to pick themselves up and continue as if nothing happened. This is in part due to how blase we are when it comes to capitalizing on these mishaps. Regarding the case above, what our community will most likely do is to laugh or make interesting conversation about said incident, but only in OUR circles.

But it's a major situation which directly outlines what many of us have been saying about the foolishness of anti-trans policies - that the problems they are supposed to handle are pretty much nonexistent, but the unintended consequences of enacting them can do a lot of damage.

It's a great situation for us to be petty.  When bigots make mistakes or cause negative unintended consequences, we should be rubbing their faces in these mishaps publicly and often.  We've desensitized ourselves so much that we've allowed the opposition to dictate the rules and arguments. When they make mistakes - and they make a lot of mistakes - we don't capitalize on these mistakes to shift the narrative. It seems that we are too busy trying to avoid the fight instead of diving in while exploiting their mistake as an advantage.

Yes, it's being petty and some folks may claim that such things are beneath us. But damn that. This isn't a gymnastic competition. We aren't being judged on points. Just overall success.


Monday, October 20, 2025

'Federal judge to block Trump from erasing trans people from states' sex education curriculum' & other Mon/Tues news briefs



Federal Judge Rules In Favor Of Public Schools In 16 States That Refused To Comply With Trump's Trans Ban - Basically, the Trump Administration was demanding that schools block any mentions of trans people in their sexual health education curriculum if they wanted federal monies. U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken said "no you don't." 


Trump nominee says MLK Jr. holiday belongs in ‘hell’ and that he has ‘Nazi streak,’ according to texts - Look at that. Another Trump Republican, this time Paul Ingrassia, his nominee to lead the Office of Special Counsel is discovered to be racist. Love this comment of his - "Using an Italian slur for Black people, Ingrassia wrote a month earlier in the group chat seen by POLITICO: “No moulignon holidays … From kwanza [sic] to mlk jr day to black history month to Juneteenth,” then added: “Every single one needs to be eviscerated.”' 


I lost a speaking gig for writing about Charlie Kirk. Meanwhile, Trump demeans Americans every day. - I don't think you sue in this situation, but from what I hear a lot of other folks who were fired because of Charlie Kirk statements are getting their jobs backs or suing. And those lawsuits have grounds. 

Saturday, October 18, 2025

'No Kings' rally/protest in Columbia, SC sends a powerful message of defiance to Trump and Republican Party

 Americans in cities all over the nation came out to represent during the No Kings rallies. My city of Columbia, SC was no different. Though I did not stay as long as I would have liked to (It was hot and I'm old. Sue me already), we had quite a number at the State House downtown. It was very empowering but folks, please keep that energy when we get to the midterm elections next year. "Batman" may have shown up at the rally, but when it comes to Trump and where our government is at the present moment, only we can save ourselves.



















Wednesday, October 15, 2025

JD Vance defends GOP leaders caught making Holocaust jokes, voicing gay slurs, and calling Black people monkeys



Recently, a group chat of leaders of Young Republican groups across the country was leaked to Politico magazine, and it is a doozy:

The messages published by Politico on Tuesday span seven months (between January and August) and include chats from Young Republican leaders in New York, Arizona, and Vermont. According to the outlet, William Hendrix, the Kansas Young Republicans’ vice chair, used racial slurs, and Peter Giunta, who at the time was chair of the organization, said people who did not vote for him to become chair of the Young Republican National Federation needed to “go to the gas chamber.” “Can we fix the showers? Gas chambers don’t fit the Hitler aesthetic,” Joe Maligno, general counsel for the New York State Young Republicans, wrote. “I’m ready to watch people burn now,” Annie Kaykaty, New York’s national committeewoman, added. 

 … According to the outlet, epithets like “f****t,” “retarded” and “n**ga” appeared more than 250 times in the chat logs. Luke Mosiman, the chair of the Arizona Young Republicans, asked in one chat whether others were watching an NBA game, and Giunta responded that he’d “go to the zoo if I wanted to watch monkey play ball.”

So, while everyone else are denouncing this and the folks involved have lost their jobs and opportunities for advancement in the Republican party, JD Vance, our "beloved" vice president decided to defend them.

Aside from playing the "what about this Democrat who did blah blah blah" game, Vance also attempted to minimize the fact that these were adults who said those awful things (which you can see in the above graphic.)

 First, according to Mediaite, Vance claimed that it was a "college group chat. Then: 

 On Wednesday’s edition of The Charlie Kirk Show, Vance addressed the controversy and again characterized the group chat’s members as “kids” and “young boys”:

 . . the reality is that kids do stupid things. Especially young boys, they tell edgy, offensive jokes, like that’s what kids do. And I really don’t want us to grow up in a country where a kid telling a stupid joke, telling a very offensive, stupid joke is cause to ruin their live. And at some point we’re all all gonna have to say enough of this BS we’re not going to allow the worst moment in a 21-year-old’s group chat to ruin a kid’s life for the rest of time. That’s just not okay. Like, we live in a digital world, this stuff is now etched in stone online. We’re all going to have to say, you know what? No, no, no. We’re not doing this. We’re not canceling kids because they do something stupid in the group chat. And if I have to be the person who carries that message forward, I’m fine with it." 

Again, these were not kids. These are grown-ass men and women making Holocaust jokes, calling Black people monkeys, and slurring LGBTQ folks with the "f" word.  But either way, to minimize what they said is not exactly the best course of action Vance should have undertaken. Seems to me that maybe Vance should have made a quick condemnation and then shut his mouth. He only made things worse for himself and his party. But I doubt he cares.

From this incident, we can get a full understanding why Trump chose Vance to be his VP during his second term. As seen by his actions on January 6, Trump's last vice president, Mike Pence, actually had a conscience and knew when it was time to break from Trump. I'm sure that Vance knows when to break from Trump too, but the question is would he? Probably not.

He's no doubt driven by his desire to replace Trump as president (either by election or Trump doing everyone a favor by dropping dead), that he's willing to act like as a rabid dog in his defense of Trump and the GOP. And apparently, he doesn't care what lie he has to tell or how far he has to twist himself to justify their actions.

But sooner or later he is going to have to pivot because no one wants a rabid dog in the White House. Have you ever seen what they do to the furniture?

Image taken from Politico article.

Monday, October 13, 2025

'MAGA falls for fake Turning Point halftime performing list (which refers to present measles outbreak)' & other Mon/Tue news briefs

The fact that so many MAGA nuts actually believed this fake list of performers for Turning Point's Halftime show is typical and funny. But the list also makes reference to a genuine measles outbreak in schools thanks to Trump Administration policies (see news brief below).  That makes entire situation also sadly ironic.


Editor's note - Bear with me because a LOT of things are going on. So much that I felt news briefs were in order instead a post about one thing.

 MAGA Falls For Fake Turning Point Halftime Show List - The poster above, mind you. The last item talking about a guest appearance from "Measles" is both funny and sadly ironic. As seen by the next news briefs, there is a measles outbreak in this country, which can be laid on the feet of Trump Administration's Secretary of Health and Human Services (and anti-vaccine nuthead) Robert Kennedy, Jr. 


The next two items come from one of my favorite sites, Erin in the Morning. It is the go-to site for news about the trans community; something mainstream media has been completely derelict about in light of the targeting of the trans community by the Trump Administration: 


New Journal Report: Cass Review “Echoes Fallacies Promoted By Anti-Trans Disinformation” - Remember how the fraudulent Cass Review took hold of Britian while America's medical professionals and members of the trans community beat back the outcome it could have had in this country? Not surprisingly, it's getting panned by The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA).

Finally: 

These LGBTQ+ refugees fled hatred & found safety in the US. Now they’re navigating Trump’s America. -"Rainbow Railroad helped them flee anti-LGBTQ+ persecution in their home countries, amid cuts to U.S. refugee programs." 

Thursday, October 09, 2025

Fron the archives: 'A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2' is the gayest horror movie you will ever see

A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2 is considered by many to be a very subversively gay horror movie. Of course when I watched it, I was surprised and pleasantly pleased by the amount of male nudity it showed. Now, as our community has moved out of the closet and into the warm glow of sunshine, it turns out that the undercurrent of homosexuality in this movie was in fact intentional. 

Or let my friend, Matt Baume tell you more:

 

 Or if you don't want to hear all of that talking, check out these scenes from A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2 and judge for yourself. (Violence and Nudity alert)

 


Editor's note - 17 Horror Films Only LGBT People Understand was not a part of the original post I pulled from the archives. It is an addition from another post.

Tuesday, October 07, 2025

'Anti-LGBTQ group accused of using false evidence' at SCOTUS, but may win its case anyway' & other Tue/Wed news briefs


Christian group defending LGBTQ+ conversion therapy at SCOTUS accused of using 'false evidence'

 The group fighting to protect so-called conversion therapy in the U.S. Supreme Court case Chiles v. Salazar has been accused of misrepresenting its evidence by the very researchers it cites. The Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal advocacy group that has played a pivotal role in several court cases involving abortion access and LGBTQ+ rights, will argue before the nation's high court Tuesday that justices should strike down state laws banning conversion therapy for minors. 

The group cites a 2016 study by Lisa Diamond and Clifford Rosky, who have since condemned the ADF for “profoundly” misrepresenting their findings. “It’s deceptive,” Rosky recently told The Guardian. “Lawyers owe a duty of candor to the court. You cannot offer false evidence, and if you do so accidentally and find out, you have to correct that. ... They claim our work supports conversion therapy when our work clearly and specifically condemns conversion therapy on the same page they’re citing.”

 Distorting science to demonize the LGBTQ community is an old anti-LGBTQ industry tactic. And the Alliance Defending Freedom isn't the first group to do it. However, it may not even matter because of the news brief below. 

Conservative Supreme Court justices show skepticism of conversion therapy ban - This is becoming an unfortunately regular occurrence with this particular Supreme Court. Almost every time our community comes in front of them, we lose. I doubt it's a matter of basic legality. It's my belief that there are members of the court who have a personal bias against LGBTQ people and will contort decisions to reflect that bias. 

The sham of oral arguments on conversion therapy is meant to show SCOTUS is 'unbiased'- Should we lose this case, we should be pointing the finger at one judge in particular who revealed his anti-LGBTQ hostility years ago - Samuel Alito.

LGBTQ rights on the line: What to watch as Supreme Court’s new term begins - And conversion therapy is not the only case in front of SCOTUS. I'm sorry but I do not believe that the number of losses the LGBTQ community has had in front of SCOTUS lately comes from legitimate looks at the law and the Constitution. Members of this court have a personal bias, which they aren't afraid to voice. We need not dance around it.