Monday, November 07, 2011

A reminder - Why NOM keeps losing in the courts

Jennifer Roback Morse
From my online blogging buddy Jeremy Hooper comes the following comments by Jennifer Roback Morse of the National Organization for Marriage's Ruth Institute on why folks on her side of the spectrum win at the ballot box but lose in the court when it comes to marriage equality:

"If you look at elections, we're winning the war on marriage. No doubt about it. We're winning the war at the ballot box. Anytime marriage goes up on a straight up-or-down vote, it wins.

Where we keep losing is in the courts, and the reason has to do with the way the elites of our society view marriage. The people who go to the top law schools, who teach at the top universities, the advertising departments of many of the major corporations – those people have already decided that marriage has nothing particularly to do with children and is really just about how adults feel with one another … and if that's all that marriage is, well, then, of course two same-sex people should be allowed to get married.

Of course Ms. Morse is full of it. The reason why NOM wins at the ballot box is because, as Equality Matters puts it, an explosion of  inaccurate information backed by lots and lots of money:

 . . . these referendums very rarely end up actually reflecting the will of the voters.

Instead, they tend to be co-opted by well-financed special interest groups like NOM that flood voters with misleading and outright false information in order to inflate public opinion against minority groups (in this case, the LGBT community). As law professor Paula Abrams wrote in 2008:
One can readily conclude that lawmaking by initiative, the manifestation of unchecked majority will, carries a high risk of producing bad laws. The “bad law” risk posed by the initiative is not simply that of generic poor policy. The absence of the deliberative process can leave the voters with profoundly inaccurate information. False information may be an unintended byproduct of the public campaign, or it may be deliberately disseminated for political advantage. Deliberate dissemination of false information can be a particularly potent and harmful strategy to agitate the majority against minority groups. Immune from legislative or executive review, initiative campaigns may rely on appeals to voter prejudice. [Oregon Law Review, Vol. 87, 1025, emphasis added, 2008]
By false information, Abrams means things like the following:

Now the reason why NOM - and other groups like it - have lost in the courts has less to do with some garbage about elites, but rather a simple thing called truth, or as lawyer David Boies told Family Research Council head Tony Perkins in a now famous scolding on CBS's Face The Nation last year:

"In a court of law you've got to come in and you've got to support those opinions, you've got to stand up under oath and cross-examination," Boies said. "And what we saw at trial is that it's very easy for the people who want to deprive gay and lesbian citizens of the right to vote [sic] to make all sorts of statements and campaign literature, or in debates where they can't be cross-examined.

"But when they come into court and they have to support those opinions and they have to defend those opinions under oath and cross-examination, those opinions just melt away. And that's what happened here. There simply wasn't any evidence, there weren't any of those studies. There weren't any empirical studies. That's just made up. That's junk science. It's easy to say that on television. But a witness stand is a lonely place to lie. And when you come into court you can't do that.

"That's what we proved: We put fear and prejudice on trial, and fear and prejudice lost," Boies said. 

In other words, NOM and its allies keep losing in the courts because the facts simply aren't on their side. Truth isn't on their side.

And all of the money in the world or spin by folks like Morse can ever change that.

Bookmark and Share

'More lies about gays, pedophilia, and AIDS' & other Monday midday news briefs

Activist - Lesbian couple, students to blame for threats to school

A lesbian couple wins homecoming king and queen at a high school and are subjected to nasty threats.

Who do you blame?

Why the students for electing the couple of course. That is if you are the American Family Association's phony news service One News Now and right-wing activist Barbara Decker:

When students at Patrick Henry High School selected a lesbian couple as the homecoming king and queen, it sparked an outpouring of e-mails and phone calls from the community. But San Diego Unified School District Superintendent Bob Kowba issued a statement to congratulate the two, and he criticizes those who argue the nomination of Rebecca Arellano and Haileigh Adams to the homecoming court, calling the concerned individuals "adult bullies" and saying they are demonstrating "a lack of tolerance and are presenting such a negative role model for children with their hateful comments."

"I'm stunned that the schools are even allowing this," says Barbara Decker of Eagle Forum San Diego. "If we don't set a benchmark of what is supposed to be a male and a female, what's going to happen to the family?"

She argues that school officials acted irresponsibly in allowing children to nominate a lesbian couple.

"If you let the children run the house, then the children aren't going to make the correct decisions," Decker contends. "They need to have the role model of the parents, and the firmness of the parents, and the guidelines of the parents and the schools."

It's fascinating that Decker did not say a word of condemnation about the emails and letters, even though some of those comments were threats - a fact which Becky Yeh (the person who wrote the One News Now article) also conveniently omitted.

Conveniently, but probably not accidentally.

The irony is that while this week One News Now runs articles attacking students' right to pick the homecoming candidate in a fair election, last week the phony news service ran an article defending a teacher (Viki Knox) who verbally attacked a pro-gay display at her school.

So apparently when you called homosexuality a "cancer" even when pertaining to your job, it's free speech and expression. But when students pick a homecoming candidate of their choice and that candidate happens to be a lesbian, it's time to "reign  in" free speech and expression.

Give One News Now credit for something - its homophobia is consistent.

Bookmark and Share