In my last post, I wrote about a Finnish study which anti-trans "medical" group SEGM claimed proves that gender-affirming care does not improve mental health of trans youth.
Two things about it:
1. One of the sources I cited said that in spite of its flaws and limitations, the study is useful as a political document and will be cited on numerous occasions by those who oppose gender-affirming care. Unfortunately, this is true. SEGM's tweet has already reached over one million hits.
2. This is important. Apparently, the study has a conflict of interest.
According to trans activist and substacker Erin Reed:
The study, published in the low-impact journal Acta Paediatrica, comes from Riittakerttu Kaltiala, a Finnish psychiatrist with extensive ties to at least one anti-LGBTQ+ hate group and a history of anti-trans political advocacy. The study uses Finnish registries and psychiatric visit data to support these conclusions. However, a closer examination reveals the study to be fatally flawed: it does not actually measure what it claims to measure, its headline finding is a massive artifact of surveillance bias, the clinics practices were abusive, and it operates within a system where its findings were essentially baked in from the start—regardless of what the actual mental health impacts of gender-affirming care might be.
The anti-trans hate group Kaltiala is connected to is SEGM - the same group which praised her study.
In a piece Reed wrote in June 2024:
Importantly, members and associates of the Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine (SEGM) have recently played a significant role in the Cass Review, a supposedly “independent” review now being cited to crack down on transgender care in England and the United States. Recent investigations revealed that multiple SEGM members and associates were part of advisory groups to the review with secret memberships. One such person was Dr. Riittakerttu Kaltiala, a Finnish psychologist who prominently presented at the latest SEGM conference and has been closely associated with SEGM, which denies her membership due to the organization having “no official members.” Dr. Kaltiala facilitated a meeting between Dr. Cass and Dr. Patrick Hunter, a DeSantis medical board pick and member of Genspect. Dr. Cass later shared information with the team according a letter obtained exclusively by this publication. Dr. Kaltiala went on to “meet regularly” with the DeSantis appointees and even testified in favor of Florida’s ban on transgender care.
I've seen numerous tweets and articles (mostly in right-wing publications) praising the study, but none of them mentioned Kaltiala's connection with SEGM or her anti-trans activism. Some may argue that Kaltiala's personal bias and connections aren't a big deal. I'm guessing they will then push a "whataboutism" narrative.
Regardless, there should have been some effort by SEGM and others promoting her study to be more forthcoming as to who she is because a serious conflict of interest does exist. Them not being forthcoming raises questions about the study's credibility.
Especially considering how a scenario not unlike this one played out over a decade ago.
This situation involving SEGM, Kaltiala, and her study on trans youth is somewhat eerily similar to a situation in 2012 when Mark Regnerus, a University of Texas professor, published a study which claimed that children in same-sex households face numerous problems. It was later discovered that study was funded by conservative group at the amount of $695,000. Other conservative and anti-LGBTQ groups tried to pass it off as objective and accurate in spite of the errors in its conclusion and methodology.
Related posts:
Fact Check: New Finnish "Study" Does Not Prove "Trans Youth Care Leads To Worse Outcomes"











