Wednesday, March 18, 2020

Coronavirus outbreak relief takes backseat to the Family Research Council's 'gay baiting'

Tony Perkins (bottom) and his group are exploiting the coronavirus to again attack LGBTQ people.

One would think that during this coronavirus pandemic, certain groups would cease their usual gay baiting. Yes, one would think and hope. But if one did so, he or she would be living in a fool's paradise. Particularly when it comes to Tony Perkins and the Family Research Council:

"We're going big." Those were the president's words heading into a Senate debate over the latest coronavirus response. In Congress, where the bills are changing faster than the infection map, the White House is racing to strike the right balance between protecting America's economy -- and helping yours. Unfortunately, fiscal matters aren't the only concern as liberals echo what Rahm Emanuel, the former chief of staff for Barack Obama, said, "You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before. 
Seizing the opportunity is exactly what Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and company tried to do by turning the virus package into a radical grab bag of abortion funding and LGBT messaging. Being in the minority Republicans had their work cut out for them. Thankfully, the White House was with them -- every step of the way. First, House Democrats tried an end-run around the Hyde amendment, the ban on taxpayer-funded abortion. "We got that back," a relieved Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) said. But it wasn't too long before liberals turned their fire on something else: the family. 
In what would have been the first time in federal law -- ever -- Democrats tried to equate "domestic partnerships" with marriage by adding benefits for anyone in "a committed relationship." Of course, as Congressman Biggs pointed out Friday, "the problem with that is that it's really hard to define a committed relationship... so they've tried to put in, in my opinion, kind of a [vague] definition. But that leaves it wide open -- and then, they [can] expand on that. So two provisions that have nothing to do with the coronavirus are basically thrown into this thing. And that's just par for the course for the for the activist Left." 
FRC worked through the weekend reading the evolving language looking for problems just like this. Understanding that in emergency situation, Emanuel's declaration is standard operating procedure for the Left. They're counting on the fact that with such a tight turnaround time, most members won't have the chance to give the language a detailed read. Fortunately, our team is reading the small print and warned the White House that liberals were using this bill to water down marriage. The president's staff took those concerns seriously, telling leaders at the negotiating table that the language had to go. It did. The section was fixed and sent on.

First of all, when it comes to abortion, FRC's entire narrative is a lie.

Anti-LGBTQ Congressman voted against coronavirus testing bill because it 'redefined family' & other Wed midday news briefs

Congressman Andy Biggs
Anti-gay Republican voted against coronavirus testing bill because it “redefined family” - Aw man, this is insane.

Idaho lawmakers ban transgender athletes from competing in women’s sports - In the middle of a coronavirus pandemic, Idaho legislators take time out to pass a ridiculous and unnecessary bill. Bigotry never sleeps.

Anti-LGBTQ media laid the groundwork for Idaho to legislate against trans athletes - I reiterate.

Rush Limbaugh Stand-In: S.F. In Coronavirus Lockdown Because It’s ‘A Big Gay Town’ - Sick, vile person.