Thursday, February 29, 2024

Delusional Chaya Raichik talks about 'eradicating gender ideology'

 I got this courtesy of Ari Drennen from Media Matters:


Chaya, please. You are delusional. You actually think you're special.

Do you think you are the first person who tried to take any part of the LGBTQ community out? We've faced bigger, prettier, and more intelligent wannabes than you. And we've always remained standing. We know how to fight, to endure, and win. You are simply another future notch in our belt.

You cannot "eradicate" the "gender ideology" because it doesn't exist. Just like the "radical gay agenda" or the "radical homosexual agenda" doesn't exist. No matter how many phrases people like you use to dehumanize and no matter how many lies you tell, you can't wipe us out.

The trans community - the LGBTQ community in general - has existed long before this country and no bowling pinheaded, flavorless wannabe with bad split ends is going to do us in. We aren't going anywhere. And we will be here when someone develops enough holy water to banish a certain piece of unwanted, unloved, unneeded gutter trash to the depths of hell's toilet where she was obviously formed. 

Wednesday, February 28, 2024

Trump promises to give far right evangelicals 'political power “at a level that you’ve never used it before”' if they support him

 A recent incident involving Donald Trump and evangelical voters reminds me of a story from the Bible regarding Jesus and Satan.

From Right Wing Watch:

Former president Donald Trump delivered a campaign speech at the National Religious Broadcasters convention in Tennessee  . . .  promising the right-wing Christian audience that they will wield political power “at a level that you’ve never used it before” if he is returned to the White House in 2024. Trump’s audience and the larger convention were populated by the same religious-right activists who are regularly featured here on Right Wing Watch and who are planning to use a second Trump term to impose their Christian nationalist worldview on the nation. 

And based on Trump’s remarks at the conference, he fully intends to give them more political power than they have ever had before. “Today I come before you as a friend and an ally and a fellow believer to ask for your help and your support and your prayers for this country,” Trump said. “I make you a simple promise: In my first term I fought for Christians harder than any president has ever done before, and I will fight even harder for Christians with four more years in the White House.”

 “We did things the likes of which nobody has ever done for Christians in this country, and I’m very proud of that and honored by it,” he added. “Just think of what with God’s help we already achieved in our historic first term under my leadership and working with you.”

 “For four years, we went through a great period [where] you were able to speak, and we’re going to make that on a permanent basis,” Trump continued. “Because you’re the people we want to hear from: the pastors and the ministers and the rabbis. The people in this room are the people we want to hear from and they have to have a political voice.” 

“You have such power, but you really weren’t allowed to use that power,” Trump told the audience. “You’re now allowed to use it. If I get in [to the White House], you’re going to be using that power at a level that you’ve never used it before."


There is a story in the Bible about Satan tempting Jesus while Jesus was in the wilderness. He told Jesus that he would give him all of the power in the world if Jesus would simply bow down and worship him. Jesus of course strongly turned him down. Too bad those who claim to follow Jesus didn't seem to get the hint.

Monday, February 26, 2024

'Is there a law against lying?' Libs of TikTok's Chaya Raichik tries to justify her 'transgender school shooter' smear

Libs of TikTok's Chaya Raichik doubles down on a lie she told about a 'transgender school shooter.'

Okay folks, I know I'm probably driving you nuts with the two-day (now three-day) coverage of Libs of TikTok's Chaya Raichik's interview with Washington Post columnist Taylor Lorenz, but bear with me, especially about this last revelation. This one is about receipt keeping should Raichik become liable for any type of legal action in the future.

From Media Matters:

Over a month after Chaya Raichik accused an innocent trans woman of carrying out the tragic school massacre in Uvalde, Texas, the Libs of TikTok creator acknowledged in an interview with The Washington Post’s Taylor Lorenz that she knew the claim was false – but said she still would not remove the post. Raichik originally used the post — which originated from 4chan trolls — to misleadingly sketch a pattern of mass shootings carried out by transgender people. 

 “Twitter is free speech,” said Raichik in response to a question about why she doesn’t delete the post, which she said she is “glad” has a community note correcting it. “People lie about me all the time on there, and they don’t get taken down.”

 “The Uvalde shooter wasn’t trans,” agreed Raichik in the interview. “Is there a law against lying? … They’re knowingly lying about me."


And that defensive garble of a statement is the point of it all, i.e. the reason why people like Raichik cannot be ignored. They must be exposed and there is a difference between amplification and exposure. Amplifying is when you repeat their filth without nuance or criticism. Exposing them is when you let them speak, but also demand that they explain their words and justify their actions. You don't let them get away with simply throwing out talking points. You challenge them. That way, you deflate whatever illusion they may have built around themselves.

And over these past several years, Raichik has been the queen of illusions. She, with the help of others, built herself up to be this grand right-wing warrior supposedly exposing LGBTQ people as groomers and pedophiles. She got a lot of fame and notoriety because it. Heck, she still has the fame and notoriety.

But what happened last weekend is the same old story which happens when someone starts believing their own hype. African-American elders call it "smelling yourself. Girlfriend got a bit caught up in her ego and put herself out there for an interview which exposed just how limited she is. And when those who oppose your rights, safety, and health expose themselves the way Raichik did last weekend, you should take full advantage in ripping off their careful created facade so that the world can see them for the nauseating creatures that they are.

Related posts: 

Libs of TikTok's Chaya Raichik fumbles badly when trying to justify her bullying of the trans community 

Sunday, February 25, 2024

Libs of TikTok's Chaya Raichik having temper tantrum because of embarrassing interview clip


Chaya Raichik

Apparently, Libs of TikTok's Chaya Raichik is highly upset about her recent video with Washington Post columnist Taylor Lorenz.

To recap - on Saturday, a video clip of an interview conducted by Lorenz with Raichik came out and it quickly went viral. The reason for this was that it showed Raichik in a severely harsh light, i.e. revealing her to be a low-intelligence bigoted bully who can't defend her vicious attacks on the LGBTQ community even when give prime opportunity to do so. 

This clip right here:

Since the clip came out, Raichik has been raging online about how she is the victim and how Taylor Lorenz supposedly did her dirty:



 Among other things, Raichik accuses Lorenze of being a "lizard person." What is that?

Anyway, the delicious irony is days before all of this happened, Raichik sent a gloating tweet which supposedly mocked her "haters."



To fall from such a lofty height of egotism to a deep pit of self-pity has to be humiliating for Raichik and particularly delicious for those who have been the targets of her venom. It's really not a surprise that yet another right-wing culture warrior and fierce protector of morality turns out to be a nothing-happening fraud with the intellectual depth of a dead cockroach and the emotional maturity of a screaming infant who needs to be changed.

LGBTQ people have seen this happen so many times that we should be used to it.


Saturday, February 24, 2024

Libs of TikTok's Chaya Raichik fumbles badly when trying to justify her bullying of the trans community

Libs of TikTok's Chaya Raichik during an interview she probably now regrets having.


My God. That's all I could say after watching this clip.

The snippet below is just a small portion of a longer interview Libs of TikTok's Chaya Raichik has with Washington Post columnist Taylor Lorenz which you can see here

 In light of all of the venom she directs at the trans community, one would think Raichik would have a concise answer when pressed about it. Or at least a well-thought out lie.  But she can't even do that.  All she can do is act a malfunctioning robot. A CHEAPLY made malfunctioning robot.

 It only goes to prove that when bullies are removed from their undeserved lofts of power (in Raichik case, her social media address), they reveal themselves to be vapid, pitiful cowards who can't even justify their actions. Calling Raichik a "lightweight" here is an insult to all lightweights.


Thursday, February 22, 2024

Mother Jones: Problematic New York Times articles are being cited in anti-trans bills



The New York Times has been receiving a lot of criticism because of how it has covered the trans community and their issues. In the face of this criticism, the newspaper, various employees, and other journalists have defended the coverage. But a new article via Mother Jones points out that The New York Times articles are not only full of distortions, but they are conveniently being cited in anti-trans legislation across the country.

 

New York Times columnist Pamela Paul argued in a 4,500-word op-ed earlier this month that transgender health care procedures amount to “unproven treatments for children,” despite major medical associations’ support for gender-affirming care and the widespread view that it is lifesaving. The piece, which builds upon Paul’s record of espousing anti-trans views in the pages of the country’s most important paper, was roundly condemned by trans journalists over what they alleged was an argument rife with inaccuracies. 

 Yet for all the criticism it unleashed, or precisely because of that very criticism, conservative groups seized upon Paul’s piece to pursue anti-trans legal maneuvers. In Idaho, the Alliance Defending Freedom, the powerful conservative legal group known for its critical role behind the strategy that overturned Roe v. Wade, specifically cited Paul’s Feb. 4 column as evidence of the “ostracism, pain, and lifelong regret” young people experience after receiving gender-affirming health care. The legal brief, which aimed to overturn a federal judge’s December ruling that blocked the state from enforcing a ban on gender-affirming health care, was ultimately unsuccessful. But it underscored the right’s enthusiasm for including New York Times pieces that have been accused of cherry-picking data and citing problematic sources in their defenses of anti-trans legislation across the country.

 . .  . Paul also appears to follow ADF’s pattern of misrepresenting data. When her piece claims that “30 percent of people on hormone therapy discontinue its use within four years,” Paul declines to include key context to that statistic: The study focused specifically on military families who stopped refilling their hormone replacement therapy prescriptions through Tricare, a health program for active duty service members. In the study, the researchers state “our findings are likely to underestimate continuation rates among transgender patients” because patients may have switched to an alternative insurance plan or private pay. 

Erin Reed, an independent trans journalist, also pointed out that the last two years of the study data coincided with Trump’s ban on transgender service members, another reason why people may have opted to switch providers. Paul presented the statistic as fact, without scientific or historical contextualization. Paul did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but after publication, a Times spokesperson said in an email that “this column was thoroughly reported and fact-checked, and we stand behind its publication.”

And, the article points out, the situation regarding Paul's op-ed is not an isolated incident. 

In pushing their bigoted propaganda, religious right groups either anoint in-house employees as experts on the LGBTQ community or rely on self-created astro-turfed groups with "official" sounding names. They still do this, but I guess it doesn't hurt nonetheless when they have people seemingly situated in legitimate entities helping them do their dirty work.

Wednesday, February 21, 2024

'Chaya's Circle' details how Libs of TikTok's Chaya Raichik plays the victim when confronted with her actions

 Libs of TikTok's founder Chaya Raichik claims that she is being unfairly targeted when it is pointed out that bomb threats and other acts of harassment have been directed at hospitals, schools, or people after she falsely smears them as "child groomers." She can complain all she wants, but there is paper trail (seen in the links below) which she needs to answer for

And, as this diagram via The Serfs shows, her attempt to play the victim when confronted is weak and self-serving. And it brings up further questions about her behavior as well as her character. 

Or lack thereof.


And for those who want to cut and paste:



Related posts (or as I like to call them - receipts):






Monday, February 19, 2024

'We told you so!' DeSantis called out for backtracking on book banning legislation he initially supported.

Florida governor and former presidential candidate Ron DeSantis

Presidential elections are generally a pain in the ass, but one of the sweetest rewards is when a wannabe candidate's campaign explodes in his face and reveals that he is nothing more than undeserved hype. With that in mind, I give you Florida governor Ron DeSantis. It has been a special delight to watch his campaign implode as it is revealed that his "culture warrior" schtick is nothing more than a sad covering for a man who has zero personality.

 Last week was another indication.

From Talking Points Media:

Back in Florida after a humiliating run against Donald Trump, Gov. Ron DeSantis is trying to do some clean up. 

 The Florida governor spent the first half of his second term signing legislation into law that would, essentially, help him run for president. His state became the breeding ground for Republicans’ manufactured culture wars as his GOP-dominated state legislature passed anti-“woke,” anti-LBGTQ, anti-“DEI” and pro-“family values” legislation into law left and right. It was widely speculated that DeSantis was using his own state to showcase policy that he hoped would resonate with Trump voters ahead of his announced 2024 bid. 

 We all know how that scheme ended. 

 So, back in Florida, after mortifying himself and dashing his own hopes of being likable on a national stage, DeSantis appears to be doing some damage control on some of the far-right legislation he signed into law. At a press conference in Orlando on Thursday the Republican governor acknowledged that his whole book banning thing had gotten a little out of control. Not because the policy itself is too extreme, of course. He blamed teachers, school administrators and “the news media” for whipping up a frenzy (he called it a “hoax”) and “activists” for trying to score political points by proposing bans on too many books. 

 “Lets’ not let people try to hijack the process,” DeSantis during the news conference Thursday. “With objecting — if you go to a school board meeting objecting. If you have a kid in school, okay. But if you’re somebody who doesn’t have a kid in school and you’re gonna object to 100 books? No, I don’t think that’s appropriate,” he continued, appearing to support a new bill that’s been proposed in the Florida state House that seeks to prevent people who don’t have children enrolled in a school district from filing complaints against a school district’s book material. 

 DeSantis is supporting legislation which would put limits and monetary fees on people challenging books, but his retreat from his original position and attempt to blame others for it isn't going unchallenged:

"This is literally one of the main things that I and many others complained about all throughout 2021-22 when right-wing activists, led by Moms for Liberty, Libs of TikTok, and others who had no children in the public school systems, were besieging schools and school board meetings, causing absolute chaos. We complained that the wording of this statute would lead to exactly what DeSantis is now complaining about. But back then, he was a culture warrior building his brand to run for president. Not only did he not want to hear it, he encouraged these people. He employed these people." - Ron Filipkowski, MeidasTouch Network 

"In an indirect way, DeSantis recognized his policies have gotten out hand. He touted a bill going through the 2024 legislative session to curb challenges from people who don’t have children at the school where they are lodging their objections. Yet, after signing laws that left local school officials scrambling to figure out what they meant, DeSantis now wants to scapegoat them. He said he’s directed the Florida Department of Education to craft rules to hold educators accountable if they go beyond what state law requires them to do. It is the state that should be held accountable, but don’t expect that from the governor." - Miami Herald Editorial Board

 “Governor DeSantis’ denial that Florida is banning books, and his shifting blame to local school boards and Floridians, is a blatant attempt to avoid responsibility for the significant and ongoing harm caused by statutes that he championed. But there is one thing we can agree on: book banning has gone too far, and limiting challenges is a good first step toward protecting Florida’s libraries.” - Katie Blankenship, director of PEN America’s Florida office

Wednesday, February 14, 2024

'Anti-LGBTQ filmmakers tried to trick people into appearing in their 'documentary'' & other Wed/Thur news briefs

Robby (left) and Landon Starbuck (right) prove that anti-LGBTQ activists are just like pigs. You can't keep them from the trough.


Right-Wing Filmmakers Allegedly Tricked a Drag Queen Into Being in an Anti-Trans Movie - Robby Starbuck and his wife, Landon, are two highly vulgar pieces of sh!t. They are two pathetic grifters of the lowest order attempting to gain status and prominence by demonizing LGBTQ people. And as this article shows, they aren't even original. 

Emails Reveal How Anti-Trans Doc Tried To Dupe LGBTQ Allies Into Participating - For those interested, this the Rolling Stone article referenced in the news article above in its entirety and no behind a paywall. 

 Related post - Taken out-of-context video fuels ugly lie about drag queens 'grooming' children - To get a complete picture of we are dealing with when it comes to the Starbucks, the following post is from 2022. It was then that Starbuck caused a huge firestorm in Tennessee by presenting a video out of context to falsely claim that a drag queen was encouraging a little girl to fondle him. It was mess like this which led to unsuccessful and very costly attempts to ban drag in the state.

Bottom line - Robby and Landon Starbuck proves there is always some trash lurking about eager to harm LGBTQ people for attention and profit. You simply cannot keep hogs away from the trough when they think food is there.

In other news

One Millions Moms is furious over those Super Bowl ads celebrating Jesus, says they weren’t anti-gay enough - Poor babies.


LGBTQ elected leaders are ‘the strongest line of defense’ - Once again, voting matters. And LGBTQ people should NEVER be ashamed to vote for their own, especially when it comes to protecting our self-interests. All other groups in this country do it. We should too.

Monday, February 12, 2024

Virginia Democrats repeat victory from last year. Eleven anti-trans bills defeated in legislative session.



Just like the Kansas City Chiefs repeated as Super Bowl champions on Sunday (you know I had to throw in a Super Bowl reference taking into account the right-wing hysteria around Taylor Swift), Virginia Democrats repeated a feat they accomplished last year.

They killed all of the anti-trans bills proposed during a legislative session. Although to be fair, Virginia legislators accomplished their feat by Friday, while the Chiefs had their victory two days later.


Virginia lawmakers have killed all of the anti-transgender bills that had been introduced during this year’s legislative session. The Senate Education and Health Committee on Thursday in a 9-6 vote tabled Senate Bill 37, which Equality Virginia said would have forcibly outed transgender students. 

A Virginia House of Delegates subcommittee on Tuesday killed an identical measure, House Bill 670. The Senate Education and Health Committee also on Thursday in a 9-6 vote killed Senate Bill 68, which would have banned trans students from school sports teams that correspond to their gender identity. The same committee on Thursday tabled an identical measure, Senate Bill 723. House subcommittees on Tuesday killed two bills — House Bill 1120 and House Bill 1229. 

 Lawmakers killed or tabled an anti-trans “Women’s Bill of Rights” that had been proposed in both General Assembly chambers. The Senate Education and Health Committee on Thursday by a 9-6 vote margin killed Senate Bill 671, which would have banned transition-related health care for minors in Virginia.

Last year, they killed 12 bills. This year it was 11.  Virginia Democrats holding majorities in the state Senate and the House (which they won during last year's election) was the reason they were able to kill the anti-trans bill during this year's session.

I am especially sharing this for two reasons - 1. Never completely give in to sadness. There is good in the world and people fighting tooth and nail for your rights. 2. VOTING MATTERS. The victory in Virginia took place because people voted the right folks in office. NEVER believe that your vote doesn't matter, regardless of what someone attempts to make you believe. Your vote matters just like YOU matter. It is your voice.

image taken from The Advocate.

Thursday, February 08, 2024

Tennessee city learns $500,000 lesson after unsuccessful attempt to ban drag shows

 

In June 2023, I made the following comments about the right-wing push to ban drag shows:

We have now entered the phase in which those who spread and entertained the lie that drag queens are 'grooming' kids are going to have to defend their mess in a court of law. And under oath. They've f@cked around for a long while. Now it's time for them to find out. 

 A recent lawsuit settlement just proved my point. 


 The Murfreesboro government has agreed to pay $500,000 and repeal an ordinance discriminatory to LGBTQ+ people to settle a lawsuit with BoroPride, the ACLU announced Wednesday. The American Civil Liberties Union provided legal representation with BoroPride annual festival organizers with the Tennessee Equality Project led by Chris Sanders, according to an ACLU press release.

 . . . The issue started October 2022 when Murfreesboro City Manager Craig Tindall sent a letter to BoroPride organizers telling them the city would deny future permits and accused the 2022 LGBTQ+ festival and drag show of exposing “children to a harmful prurient interest.”

 BoroPride attracted more than 7,000 people to the 2022 festival held at Cannonsburgh Village, a Murfreesboro historic parks and recreation property off U.S. Highway 41 and across the street from nearby City Hall in the downtown area. Festival organizers relocated the 2023 BoroPride to Tennessee Miller Coliseum in north Murfreesboro. The coliseum property is owned by Middle Tennessee State University.

 In addition, according to The Murfreesboro Daily News Journal, the city council also passed a "community decency standards ordinance." That ordinance was repealed in December due to the lawsuit. 

 Also:
 . . . The $500,000 settlement compensates for harm caused and reimburse attorneys’ fees . . . and accept and process any future event permit applications from BoroPride organizers, according to the press release. The Murfreesboro city manager is prohibited under the terms from reviewing any future permit requests from the Tennessee Equality Project (TEP), the press release said.

 "The parties filed suit in federal court after Tindall and Murfreesboro Mayor Shane McFarland engaged in a yearlong, concerted anti-LGBTQ+ campaign to chill TEP and Murfreesboro residents’ protected speech and expression," the press release said.


Editor's note - I am reposting this list of the times in which drag queens and drag shows have been deliberately mischaracterized as x-rated by those on the right. A paper trail exists for those willing to seek it out:

Far right activists don't know the difference between a circus act and a drag show



Wednesday, February 07, 2024

'Libs of Tik Tok's Chaya Raichik has meltdown when called out again by NBC News' & other Wed/Thur news briefs

 

Libs of Tik Tok's Chaya Raichik being interviewed by Tucker Carlson (left) and attending the Jan 6th insurrection (right).


Editor's note - You ever had one of those days when you are ill AND there is a lot of stuff going on; so much so that you have to put out news briefs instead of focusing on one issue? Apparently, that's MY day today:

After Libs of TikTok posted, at least 21 bomb threats followed - More of the same from Libs of TikTok's Chaya Raichik. And she is reacting to the article with the self-pitying, hysterical junk we've come to expect from her. 

Chaya Raichik is probably the saddest, most pathetic bigot I've ever come across in the 17 years I've had this blog. She's a hyperactive version of a repressed old maid in that she anoints herself as a guardian of morality, so she doesn't to face the fact that no one wants or desires her. By pointing an accusing finger at LGBTQ people, Chaya refuses to take responsibility for what makes her a repellent person. If she did, she would realize that her attitude is the problem. She exudes vitriol and hatred from every pore like body odor. Or maybe Chaya is fully aware of this fact and that makes her all the more sadly repulsive. Just like a snake can't ever change from being a snake, a hateful pig can't stop wallowing in the mud. 

 In other news:


Transgender bathroom bills are back. Does the nation care? - I personally think it's because the conservative make-up of the Supreme Court has made certain people bolder. 


Survey: 90,000 trans people overwhelmingly say life improves after transition - Folks need to pay attention to what trans people are saying instead of trying to legislate their lives out of existence. 

Monday, February 05, 2024

Transphobia costs - South Dakota settles lawsuit with transgender advocacy group for $300,000 and a public apology

South Dakota and its governor Kristi Noem recently learned a very expensive and hopefully humiliating lesson about transphobic animus. A lesson which cost the state $300,000 and a public apology.

From The South Dakota Searchlight:

The state of South Dakota has issued an apology letter and a $300,000 payment to a transgender advocacy group for the abrupt cancellation of a Department of Health contract in 2022. Those are the terms of a settlement agreement inked Thursday in a federal discrimination lawsuit filed by The Transformation Project shortly after the cancellation. The group had a contract with the state, paid for with federal funds, to provide community health worker services to the LGBTQ+ community from its Sioux Falls headquarters. The cancellation came on Dec. 16, 2022, shortly after a conservative news outlet contacted Gov. Kristi Noem to ask why the state had signed the $136,000 contract.

And here is the clincher. 

The Transformation Project’s lawsuit cited Noem’s public comments on transgender people and her response to the conservative news outlet, made through spokesperson Ian Fury, as proof that the decision was discriminatory in nature. 

“The contract was signed without Gov. Noem’s prior knowledge or approval,” Fury told the outlet. 

 The state offered a series of alleged failures on the part of The Transformation Project as reasons for the cancellation, but the lawsuit argued that those reasons were meant to put “a thin gloss” of legitimacy on a discriminatory action. 

 The Searchlight said the settlement is over double the amount of the contract and also covers attorney fees. In addition: 

The community health worker hired through the contract, Jack Fonder, was also named as a plaintiff in The Transformation Project’s lawsuit. 

 As part of the settlement, the current Department of Health secretary wrote an apology letter to Fonder and the project’s director, Susan Williams. “On behalf of the State of South Dakota, I apologize that the Transformation Project’s contract was terminated and for treating the Transformation Project differently than other organizations awarded Community Health Worker contracts,” Secretary Melissa Magstadt wrote in the Jan. 17 letter. 

 She went on to “emphasize that all South Dakotans are entitled to equal treatment under the law — regardless of their race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, or sex.”

Noem is just one of the many Republican governors attempting to undermine the health and safety of the transgender community. Last year, she signed a bill into law which banned gender-affirming care for trans youth. 

Sunday, February 04, 2024

Moms for Liberty now facing significant pushback against its agenda from other parents

This post is by no means an encouragement for pre-celebration, but yes Moms for Liberty is having significant problems right now. And it all comes down to the fact that more and more people are getting tired of the group's bullshit:

In Florida, where the right-wing Moms for Liberty group was born in response to Covid-19 school closures and mask mandates, the first Brevard County School Board meeting of the new year considered whether two bestselling novels – “The Kite Runner” and “Slaughterhouse-Five” – should be banned from schools. A lone Moms for Liberty supporter sat by herself at the January 23 meeting, where opponents of the book ban outnumbered her. 

 Nearly 20 speakers voiced opposition to removing the novels from school libraries. One compared the book-banning effort to Nazi Germany. Another accused Moms for Liberty of waging war on teachers. No one spoke in favor of the ban. About three hours into the meeting, the board voted quickly to keep the two books on the shelves of high schools.

 “Why are we banning books?” asked Mindy McKenzie, a mom and nurse who is a member of Stop Moms for Liberty, which was formed to counter what it calls a far-right extremist group “pushing for book banning and destroying public education.” “Why are we letting Moms for Liberty infiltrate our school system?” 

 Moms for Liberty, founded in 2021, expanded its mission to include efforts to ban certain books from schools, outlaw the teaching and discussion of gender and sexuality by teachers and halt the teaching of critical race theory. Now the group is at a crossroads.

 “One of their major challenges is the fact that most Americans are actually pretty positive about their own children’s schools,” Jack Schneider, a professor of education at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, said via email. “Although their message may have appeal in the abstract, at least to conservative voters, families aren’t clamoring for disruption in their own children’s schools.” 

 After effectively channeling conservative anger over cultural issues into action on the ground, from supporting candidates in school board races to spearheading campaigns against teachers, administrators and other political foes, Moms for Liberty’s burgeoning influence in Republican national politics may be faltering, observers say.

 . . . Jennifer Jenkins, who defeated (Moms for Liberty co-founder Tina) Descovich to win her seat on the Brevard County School Board in 2020, said the influence of Moms for Liberty is fading as more parents begin to question the group’s positions. 

 “I think that things have gone too far and people are finally standing up to say, you know, ‘This is my choice. These are my kids as well too. You don’t get to make these decisions for us,’” Jenkins said. “People are seeing, you know, news cycle after news cycle, the hypocrisy of the things that they advocate for and they say they stand,” she said.