![]() |
| SEGM, an anti-trans 'medical group,' got pushback after it implied that a Finland study refutes the belief that gender-affirming therapy helps trans youth. |
Those who have followed this blog over the years (it will be 20 this September) know that a feature is me calling out the religious right and the anti-LGBTQ industry when they create junk science and distort legitimate studies to demonize LGBTQ people. It's been a while since I've done this, so I think today is a good time to throw one out with the help of people more knowledgeable on this particular subject that I am.
First, a little background.
The Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine (SEGM) is an organization which claims to "promote safe, compassionate, ethical and evidence-informed healthcare for children, adolescents, and young adults with gender dysphoria."The report, Combating Anti-LGBTQ+ Pseudoscience Through Accessible Informative Narratives, also known as Project CAPTAIN, unpacks the proliferation of biased and misleading information used — under the guise of science — in state and federal legislation and litigation over the last decade and exposes the far right and far-reaching network behind it.Researchers from the SPLC’s Intelligence Project identify a network of over 60 groups, including Alliance Defending Freedom, the Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine and Genspect, with nearly 1,000 shared connections that have mobilized their efforts to challenge the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) standards, advance the so-called “Women’s Bill of Rights” and recruit for Project 2025. Project CAPTAIN lists the 100 commonly cited sources used by anti-LGBTQ+ actors to make junk science claims, including research papers and letters to the editor, that attack the scientific consensus of gender-affirming care, defend conversion therapy and generate moral panic over trans people.“We show how this network of anti-LGBTQ+ actors have built a political and PR machine that twists data and opinion from a very small minority of the medical community and positions it as mainstream,” said R.G. Cravens, senior research analyst for SPLC’s Intelligence Project.
Finland’s data are critical in the current debates on pediatric gender medicine. To our knowledge, Finland is the only country reporting full registry data, meaning outcomes are captured for all patients. By contrast, Dutch follow-up studies rely on later volunteers, with dropout…
— SEGM (@segm_ebm) April 4, 2026
— LGBwiththeT (@LGBwiththeT) April 6, 2026
THERE IS A LOT IT DOESN'T TELL US!
— 👩⚕️ Dr. Laura 👩⚕️ (@datadriven_tdoc) April 5, 2026
1) In the patients who received gender interventions, we don't know if the increased use of psych services occurred after, during, or following the intervention, and for how long
2) we don't know if the psych visits were for management of…
MOST IMPORTANTLY, THERE IS LITTLE IN THE DATA TO SUPPORT SEGMs ASSERTIONS ABOUT PSYCH "SYMPTOMS" WORSENING AFTER TREATMENT
— 👩⚕️ Dr. Laura 👩⚕️ (@datadriven_tdoc) April 5, 2026
this study assessed psych service utilization, and did not measure symptoms
there is no way to assess mental or overall well being/quality-of-life, given…
ZOMBIE STUDIES NEVER DIE!!!
— 👩⚕️ Dr. Laura 👩⚕️ (@datadriven_tdoc) April 5, 2026
The trans care evidence base is littered with what I call "zombie literature": severely methodologically flawed or limited studies that get repeatedly cited by supporters of a particular theory of a case as "proof" of a preferred outcome, and which… pic.twitter.com/HPxj3ik6c5










