In my home state of South Carolina, Irmo High School principal Eddie Walker retired as of last week.
Two years ago, Walker created an ugly controversy when he threatened to resign when the school board told him that he would have to allow gay/straight alliance at Irmo High School.
Walker claimed that the club was about sex and he felt students would be harmed because of it.
After a huge ado, the club was started, but the school board established a sort of opt-in policy so that parents could have a say about what clubs their children could - or in this case - couldn't join.
Walker, by the way, changed his mind about resigning. I hear it was for "economic reasons."
Early this morning (we are talking between five and seven a.m.), he had an interview with WIS-TV where he supposedly "spoke for the first time" about the controversy.
At least that's what was hyped. What was also hyped was a "personal confession" by Walker.
The interview was crap, though not through the fault of the interviewer. There is only so much one can do with a less than a two-minute interview. No probing questions were asked -only a soliloquy of Walker repeating the same nonsense he voiced two years ago.
About how he loved the students. About how he felt the club was about sex and it would damage children. About his claim to have a "Biblical perspective."
Walker also said he felt that people choose to be gay. And the "personal confession?" Walker said he had a gay uncle and the "lifestyle" damaged him.
And let's not forget the prerequisite statement of homophobes - so that you don't think that they are homophobes - he "loves homosexuals."
All and all the interview added up to a minute and a half of my life which should have been spent in bed.
Never in my life have I seen such an ignorant, oblivious individual who seems to have learned nothing after two years.
At the time of the controversy, I said that Walker exacerbated the controversy by automatically branding the organization a "sex club" without actually talking to the students who wanted to start the organization.
I had hoped that since that time, he would have taken it upon himself to learn more about the importance of gay/straight alliances.
Sadly I was mistaken.
Unfortunately Walker seems to be indicative of so many claiming to have a "Biblical worldview" i.e. using religion to justify fear, ignorance, and being bullheaded.
It's really not anything to be proud of, especially when you are in a position like Walker was.
No matter how he and others who support try to sugarcoat his career, the legacy of Eddie Walker will be because of his personal beliefs, he turned his back on children who need him most, i.e. lgbt students who generally have no support system, who sometimes get picked on and beaten up for simply being as God made them, who can't come out to their parents for fear of being disowned and thrown out of their homes.
Walker was the one person whom they could have turned to for some support, but apparently he was too busy listening for the voice of God.
It's generally what happens when you are so busy trying to listen to the voice of God. You neglect the cries of His children.
Related posts:
Principal in MY state gets it right and wrong
Day Two of the Irmo GSA controversy finds that ignorance abounds
News from Irmo: School Board postpones decision regarding GSA
Grandstanding Principal Wants To Return
Analyzing and refuting the inaccuracies lodged against the lgbt community by religious conservative organizations. Lies in the name of God are still lies.
Wednesday, July 07, 2010
Tuesday, July 06, 2010
'Top Ten Myths About Homosexuality' is a huge homophobic fraud
From time to time, religious right groups will publish "studies" or "resource guides" which they claim give the true picture of homosexuality. These guides are meant to be referred to by individuals who want reasons to oppose lgbt progress, be it in schools or society in general.
A perfect example of one of these "research guides" is an interesting piece of work on webpage of the Family Research Council entitled The Top Ten Myths About Homosexuality.
According to its author Peter Sprigg:
According to Sprigg, these "myths" include the following:
Sprigg isn't necessarily unbiased when it comes to the lgbt community. At one time he said that "homosexual behavior" should be declared illegal. Another time before that, he publicly said that lgbts should be exported out of the United States.
However, even excluding Sprigg's dubious comments, there is enough problems with Ten Myths to question its credibility.
At first glance, Ten Myths looks legitimate. However, a more intensive look reveals it to be a mishmash of inaccurate theories, cherry-picked work, and studies taken out of context created to justify homophobia
The following are just a few of the problems with Ten Myths:
1. Ten Myths repeats the lie that the Robert Spitzer study proves that homosexuality is changeable, excluding the fact that Spitzer has said on more than one occasion that his research was being distorted.
2. Ten Myths utilizes the work of the organization National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH). The website Truth Wins Out calls NARTH a discredited “ex-gay” fringe organization that peddles fraudulent “cures” for homosexuality.
According to Truth Wins Out, several NARTH members have been embroiled in controversies including:
Also, according to Truth Wins Out:
Earlier this year, another member of NARTH, George Rekers, resigned from the organization after caught coming from a vacation overseas with a "rentboy."
3. Ten Myths cites Ex-gays? A Longitudinal Study of Religiously Mediated Change in Sexual Orientation by Stanton L. Jones and Mark A Yarhouse as proof that people can change their sexual orientation. However in 2009, the American Psychological Association repudiated this study for bad methodology. Furthermore, Ten Myths does not address the conclusion by the APA last year that programs created to change a person's several orientation does not work.
4. Ten Myths pushes the inaccuracy that a man who molests a boy is automatically gay even though the American Psychological Association, the National Association of Social Workers, the American Academy of Child Psychiatrists and the Child Welfare League of America, all say that the homosexuality and pedophilia are not linked
5. But the most egregious inaccuracy in Ten Myths - and also something that says a lot about the mindset of its author, Peter Sprigg - is the following passage:
So Sprigg's point is that the lgbt orientation itself is indicative of negative behaviors (i.e. drug and alcohol abuse) and not the homophobia that lgbts face.
But strange enough, the source which he cites - the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association - says that homophobia is the reason for many of these health problems. Sprigg deliberately omits information pointing this out:
So basically The Top Ten Myths of Homosexuality is a fraud. And the mythology that Sprigg spoke of has nothing to do with lgbts but with the mindset of anyone who takes his paper seriously and sees it for more than what it is - blatant homophobia wrapped up in phony science.
A perfect example of one of these "research guides" is an interesting piece of work on webpage of the Family Research Council entitled The Top Ten Myths About Homosexuality.
According to its author Peter Sprigg:
The homosexual movement is built, not on facts or research, but on mythology. Unfortunately, these myths have come to be widely accepted in society—particularly in schools, universities and the media. It is our hope that by understanding what these key myths are—and then reading a brief summary of the evidence against them—the reader will be empowered to challenge these myths when he or she encounters them.
According to Sprigg, these "myths" include the following:
- People are born gay.
- Sexual orientation can never change.
- Homosexuals do not experience a higher level of psychological disorders than heterosexuals.
- Homosexuals are no more likely to molest children than heterosexuals.
Sprigg isn't necessarily unbiased when it comes to the lgbt community. At one time he said that "homosexual behavior" should be declared illegal. Another time before that, he publicly said that lgbts should be exported out of the United States.
However, even excluding Sprigg's dubious comments, there is enough problems with Ten Myths to question its credibility.
At first glance, Ten Myths looks legitimate. However, a more intensive look reveals it to be a mishmash of inaccurate theories, cherry-picked work, and studies taken out of context created to justify homophobia
The following are just a few of the problems with Ten Myths:
1. Ten Myths repeats the lie that the Robert Spitzer study proves that homosexuality is changeable, excluding the fact that Spitzer has said on more than one occasion that his research was being distorted.
2. Ten Myths utilizes the work of the organization National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH). The website Truth Wins Out calls NARTH a discredited “ex-gay” fringe organization that peddles fraudulent “cures” for homosexuality.
According to Truth Wins Out, several NARTH members have been embroiled in controversies including:
Gerald Schoenwolf, PhD, a member of NARTH’ “Scientific Advisory Committee,” who wrote a piece on the group’s website that seemed to justify slavery
NARTH psychiatrist Joseph Berger, MD, another member of its “Scientific Advisory Committee,” who wrote a paper encouraging students to “ridicule” gender variant children.
Also, according to Truth Wins Out:
NARTH’ co-founder, Joesph Nicolosi encourages male clients to become more masculine by drinking Gatorade and referring to friends as “dude”. NARTH therapists have been known to practice rubber band therapy, where a gay client is made to wear a rubber band and snap it on his wrist when sexually stimulated. It is a mild form of aversion therapy meant to “snap” the client out of the moment of attraction. NARTH members have also been known to practice “touch therapy”, where a client sits in the therapist’ lap for up to an hour, while the therapist caresses him.
Earlier this year, another member of NARTH, George Rekers, resigned from the organization after caught coming from a vacation overseas with a "rentboy."
3. Ten Myths cites Ex-gays? A Longitudinal Study of Religiously Mediated Change in Sexual Orientation by Stanton L. Jones and Mark A Yarhouse as proof that people can change their sexual orientation. However in 2009, the American Psychological Association repudiated this study for bad methodology. Furthermore, Ten Myths does not address the conclusion by the APA last year that programs created to change a person's several orientation does not work.
4. Ten Myths pushes the inaccuracy that a man who molests a boy is automatically gay even though the American Psychological Association, the National Association of Social Workers, the American Academy of Child Psychiatrists and the Child Welfare League of America, all say that the homosexuality and pedophilia are not linked
5. But the most egregious inaccuracy in Ten Myths - and also something that says a lot about the mindset of its author, Peter Sprigg - is the following passage:
Even the pro-homosexual Gay & Lesbian Medical Association (GLMA) acknowledges:
• “Gay men use substances at a higher rate than the general population . . .”
• “Depression and anxiety appear to affect gay men at a higher rate . . . .”
• “ . . . [G]ay men have higher rates of alcohol dependence and abuse . . . .”
• “ . . . [G]ay men use tobacco at much higher rates than straight men . . . .”
• “Problems with body image are more common among gay men . . . and gay men are much more likely to experience an eating disorder . . . .”
The GLMA also confirms that:
• “ . . . [L]esbians may use tobacco and smoking products more often than heterosexual women use them.”
• “Alcohol use and abuse may be higher among lesbians.”
• “ . . . [L]esbians may use illicit drugs more often than heterosexual women.”
Homosexual activists generally attempt to explain these problems as results of “homophobic discrimination.” However, there is a serious problem with that theory—there is no empirical evidence that such psychological problems are greater in areas where disapproval of homosexuality is more intense.
So Sprigg's point is that the lgbt orientation itself is indicative of negative behaviors (i.e. drug and alcohol abuse) and not the homophobia that lgbts face.
But strange enough, the source which he cites - the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association - says that homophobia is the reason for many of these health problems. Sprigg deliberately omits information pointing this out:
Sprigg:
“Depression and anxiety appear to affect gay men at a higher rate . . . .”
GMLA:
Depression and anxiety appear to affect gay men at a higher rate than in the general population. The likelihood of depression or anxiety may be greater, and the problem may be more severe for those men who remain in the closet or who do not have adequate social supports. Adolescents and young adults may be at particularly high risk of suicide because of these concerns.
Sprigg:
“ . . . [L]esbians may use illicit drugs more often than heterosexual women.
GMLA:
Research indicates that lesbians may use illicit drugs more often than heterosexual women. This may be due to added stressors in lesbian lives from discrimination. Lesbians need support from each other and from health care providers to find healthy releases, quality recreation, stress reduction, and coping techniques.
So basically The Top Ten Myths of Homosexuality is a fraud. And the mythology that Sprigg spoke of has nothing to do with lgbts but with the mindset of anyone who takes his paper seriously and sees it for more than what it is - blatant homophobia wrapped up in phony science.
Ugandan lgbt advocate viciously murdered and other Tuesday midday news briefs
Ugandan LGBT Advocate Found Beheaded - Lgbts in the United States don't have it half as bad as the brave souls in Uganda.
FRC Wants MA Residents to Call Upon "Senator Kirk" To Oppose Kagan - What I want the FRC to do shouldn't be repeated in polite company.
Maggie's flawed analogies: A is to B as C is to 4 - More phoniness brought to you by Maggie Gallagher.
Dayton, TN, Science Teacher and Students Exemplify Everything That’s Wrong With American Education - Lord, give me strength!
FRC Wants MA Residents to Call Upon "Senator Kirk" To Oppose Kagan - What I want the FRC to do shouldn't be repeated in polite company.
Maggie's flawed analogies: A is to B as C is to 4 - More phoniness brought to you by Maggie Gallagher.
Dayton, TN, Science Teacher and Students Exemplify Everything That’s Wrong With American Education - Lord, give me strength!
A funny look at 'gay' commercials
I am presently working on a post regarding a "research paper" from the Family Research Council regarding homosexuality. There seems to be several inaccuracies in this paper and - as I see it - one glaring inaccuracy which says more about the organization than it does about lgbts.
Keep your fingers crossed. But for now, as I attempt to ease back into the work mode, allow me to bring you another clip from infomania which talks about gay commercials:
Past infomania posts:
An interesting and thought-provoking take on lgbt pride
Elena Kagan 'plays softball like a lesbian'
Conversion Therapy - a video with George Rekers in mind
Advice to closeted politicans - How to keep from being exposed
Why the phrase 'No Homo' is highly needed
Reasons why the 'sanctity' of proms MUST be preserved from Constance McMillen
Why gay marriage is 'wrong'
Keep your fingers crossed. But for now, as I attempt to ease back into the work mode, allow me to bring you another clip from infomania which talks about gay commercials:
Past infomania posts:
An interesting and thought-provoking take on lgbt pride
Elena Kagan 'plays softball like a lesbian'
Conversion Therapy - a video with George Rekers in mind
Advice to closeted politicans - How to keep from being exposed
Why the phrase 'No Homo' is highly needed
Reasons why the 'sanctity' of proms MUST be preserved from Constance McMillen
Why gay marriage is 'wrong'
Monday, July 05, 2010
Repost: Concerned Women for America's slanted poll makes me crazy
Seeing that today is an extremely slow news day, I thought I would repost a piece a wrote when I was attempting to be clever about a slanted Concerned Women for America poll:
According to People for the American Way's Right Wing Watch, Concerned Women for American sent a survey to its members asking their opinions on the so-called "impact of the radical homosexual agenda in public schools."
You have to see these questions. They are unbelievable. Allow me to add some degree of editorialization (is that even a word) after each question:
1. Do you support teaching children in grades as early as kindergarten that cross-dressing is acceptable?
No. Children should learn to cross-dress before entering kindergarten.
2. What kind of impact do you believe this kind of teaching would have on young children? .
It would teach them how to properly accessorize.
3. Do you believe school children as young as 13 should be exposed to explicit, detailed discussions and instructions on homosexual practices (including sodomy) as are being conducted by homosexual teachers and activists right now?
That's not even necessary. Just make watching High School Musical mandatory. You'll get the same results.
4. What kind of impact do you believe this kind of instruction would have on young children?
They are sure to pay attention in class. Get them to take notes.
5. Do you believe the increase of homosexual experimentation among teens is related to presentation of pro-"gay" instruction in the classroom?
By homosexual experimentation, I'm guessing CWA means lip synching a Christina Aguilera song.
6. Is it possible for the radical homosexual agenda to succeed in achieving its overriding goal of changing the moral character of our young people and the moral landscape of our nation through our schools?
I'm guessing they mean as opposed to the "normal homosexual agenda." And I don't know what that is because national headquarters has yet to send me the manual. I think it's a racial thing.
7. What impact would this have on our nation and the next generation leading it?
No one will be wearing white after Labor Day.
8. Do you agree that instruction in some classrooms is a blatant push to unashamedly promote and encourage the homosexual lifestyle and ultimately force "gay marriage" on the American public?
That's right - we want everyone in a gay marriage. I am personally overseeing the committee to put Jack Black, Abraham Benrubi, Seth Rogen, Jonah Hill, and Mike White in a polygamous marriage with myself. Call me boys - you either come to my house peacefully or else.
9. Do you feel instilling positive views of homosexuality in schools will result in America accepting same-sex "marriages"?
I sincerely hope so. Mother is hoping that I snag either a doctor or a lawyer.
10. Do you agree that homosexual "marriage" is as valid as traditional marriage, as is being taught in some school districts?
Who cares. As long as no one laughs at me for wearing white at MY wedding.
11. What impact on traditional marriage do you believe this kind of classroom instruction will have in the future?
Who cares. As long as no one laughs at me for wearing white at MY wedding. (Yes I repeated it!)
12. Do you support laws requiring schools to obtain parents' permission before their child is exposed to information of a homosexual nature?
Where the hell were you people when I had to read the Razor's Edge by gay author Somerset Maugham? Or when I was forced to watch that Strawberry Shortcake cartoon in grade school? That Peculiar Purple Pie Man of Porcupine Peak was a little TOO peculiar.
13. What impact on traditional marriage do you believe homosexual teaching would have in the future?
Not knowing who has to pay for the wedding.
14. Are you will to take a moral stand against pro-homosexual classroom curriculum by taking grassroots action against the organizations who promote it?
I would rather take an immoral stand. It's much more fun but you gotta make sure you destroy all of the pictures.
15. Will you help Concerned Women for America as we stand strong for Biblical principles and against the radical homosexual agenda in our schools?
Sure. Bend over. I hope you like fillet of sole.
I'm sorry if I am taking this too lightly. It's not even frustrating anymore when I read stuff like this. Not only is the poll slanted, but it's chock full of biases, code words (i.e. "pro-gay instruction"), and presents the lgbt community in the worst possible light.
To the CWA, we aren't people with feelings and emotions who care about family and country. To them, we are an entity out of some bad science fiction movie constantly plotting to seduce childen and take over America while having lots of wild sex in our leisure time (and trust me when I say that last point is a blatant lie).
I won't even tell you how the CWA members who responded to the poll answered the questions. I will let you guess.
However, according to Right Wing Watch, CWA said that a small percentage of its members responded at all.
I guess that means even right-wing conservative Christians get embarrassed now and then.
According to People for the American Way's Right Wing Watch, Concerned Women for American sent a survey to its members asking their opinions on the so-called "impact of the radical homosexual agenda in public schools."
You have to see these questions. They are unbelievable. Allow me to add some degree of editorialization (is that even a word) after each question:
1. Do you support teaching children in grades as early as kindergarten that cross-dressing is acceptable?
No. Children should learn to cross-dress before entering kindergarten.
2. What kind of impact do you believe this kind of teaching would have on young children? .
It would teach them how to properly accessorize.
3. Do you believe school children as young as 13 should be exposed to explicit, detailed discussions and instructions on homosexual practices (including sodomy) as are being conducted by homosexual teachers and activists right now?
That's not even necessary. Just make watching High School Musical mandatory. You'll get the same results.
4. What kind of impact do you believe this kind of instruction would have on young children?
They are sure to pay attention in class. Get them to take notes.
5. Do you believe the increase of homosexual experimentation among teens is related to presentation of pro-"gay" instruction in the classroom?
By homosexual experimentation, I'm guessing CWA means lip synching a Christina Aguilera song.
6. Is it possible for the radical homosexual agenda to succeed in achieving its overriding goal of changing the moral character of our young people and the moral landscape of our nation through our schools?
I'm guessing they mean as opposed to the "normal homosexual agenda." And I don't know what that is because national headquarters has yet to send me the manual. I think it's a racial thing.
7. What impact would this have on our nation and the next generation leading it?
No one will be wearing white after Labor Day.
8. Do you agree that instruction in some classrooms is a blatant push to unashamedly promote and encourage the homosexual lifestyle and ultimately force "gay marriage" on the American public?
That's right - we want everyone in a gay marriage. I am personally overseeing the committee to put Jack Black, Abraham Benrubi, Seth Rogen, Jonah Hill, and Mike White in a polygamous marriage with myself. Call me boys - you either come to my house peacefully or else.
9. Do you feel instilling positive views of homosexuality in schools will result in America accepting same-sex "marriages"?
I sincerely hope so. Mother is hoping that I snag either a doctor or a lawyer.
10. Do you agree that homosexual "marriage" is as valid as traditional marriage, as is being taught in some school districts?
Who cares. As long as no one laughs at me for wearing white at MY wedding.
11. What impact on traditional marriage do you believe this kind of classroom instruction will have in the future?
Who cares. As long as no one laughs at me for wearing white at MY wedding. (Yes I repeated it!)
12. Do you support laws requiring schools to obtain parents' permission before their child is exposed to information of a homosexual nature?
Where the hell were you people when I had to read the Razor's Edge by gay author Somerset Maugham? Or when I was forced to watch that Strawberry Shortcake cartoon in grade school? That Peculiar Purple Pie Man of Porcupine Peak was a little TOO peculiar.
13. What impact on traditional marriage do you believe homosexual teaching would have in the future?
Not knowing who has to pay for the wedding.
14. Are you will to take a moral stand against pro-homosexual classroom curriculum by taking grassroots action against the organizations who promote it?
I would rather take an immoral stand. It's much more fun but you gotta make sure you destroy all of the pictures.
15. Will you help Concerned Women for America as we stand strong for Biblical principles and against the radical homosexual agenda in our schools?
Sure. Bend over. I hope you like fillet of sole.
I'm sorry if I am taking this too lightly. It's not even frustrating anymore when I read stuff like this. Not only is the poll slanted, but it's chock full of biases, code words (i.e. "pro-gay instruction"), and presents the lgbt community in the worst possible light.
To the CWA, we aren't people with feelings and emotions who care about family and country. To them, we are an entity out of some bad science fiction movie constantly plotting to seduce childen and take over America while having lots of wild sex in our leisure time (and trust me when I say that last point is a blatant lie).
I won't even tell you how the CWA members who responded to the poll answered the questions. I will let you guess.
However, according to Right Wing Watch, CWA said that a small percentage of its members responded at all.
I guess that means even right-wing conservative Christians get embarrassed now and then.
Woman sues her church because it performed gay marriage ceremony
After Yvonne Moore, a member of Covenant Baptist Church in Washington, D.C., sat through a same sex commitment ceremony in her church in 2007, she was angry. First, she filed a lawsuit. Then she left the congregation she has been a part of for nearly 40 years.
“Why did I do it?” Moore said during a CNN interview. “That’s a good question. It’s funny now because that’s not of God. That was me. I just got pissed off.
“I’m Southern Baptist and the Bible speaks against it [gay marriage],” she said. “You cannot take that in the church.”
Moore has since dropped the lawsuit, but said she’ll never return to the church.
At their recent annual convention, Southern Baptists approved resolutions to promote the institution of marriage and family in their churches and to condemn legislative attempts to legalize homosexuality in the military and the workplace.
According to CNN, Moore, who attended the commitment ceremony for the gay couple-- to see if it would actually occur, told an interviewer—she sued for the refund of the more than $250,000 she believes she’s given to the church.
Church Pastors Christine and Dennis Wiley have very different views than those of Moore.
“You cannot just read the Bible and think that somehow you have now mastered the word of God,” Dennis Wiley said.
More here
Friday, July 02, 2010
Know Your LGBT History - A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge
I betcha that not too many folks are aware of the fact that A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge (1985) was filled with homoerotic undertones.
Mark Patton (who later did come out as a gay man) portrays a teenager who is trying to keep from being possessed by serial killer Freddy Krueger.
Seriously though, with a plot so simple, why would someone think that this movie was gay? Well for starters, the character portrayed by Patton isn't the most masculine fellow in the world. It goes without saying that there were some scenes in which he reminded me of Sean Hayes from Will and Grace such as this one featuring him cleaning his room:
Then there is this scene where Freddy induces the young man to go to a club where he meets his coach (starting at 2:20):
It was the first time I discovered that white male booties can jiggle. LOL
Happy Fourth, folks
Past Know Your LGBT History postings
Know Your LGBT History - Noah's Arc
Know Your LGBT History - Ode to Billy Joe
Know Your LGBT History - Adorable Adrian Adonis
Know Your LGBT History - The Night Strangler
Know Your LGBT History - All in the Family
Know Your LGBT History - Tongues Untied
Know Your LGBT History - The Celluloid Closet
Know Your LGBT History - Querelle
Know Your LGBT History - Theatre of Blood
Know Your LGBT History - Strange Fruit
Know Your LGBT History - Designing Women
Know Your LGBT History - The Children's Hour
Know Your LGBT History - Sylvester
Know Your LGBT History - Once Bitten
Know Your LGBT History - The Boys in the Band
Know Your LGBT History - Christopher Morley, the crossdressing assassin
Know Your LGBT History - Midnight Cowboy
Know Your LGBT History - Dracula's Daughter
Know Your LGBT History - Blacula
Know Your LGBT History - 3 Strikes
Know Your LGBT History - Paris Is Burning
Know Your LGBT History - The Women
Know your LGBT History - Soul Plane
Know Your LGBT History - The Player's Club
Special Know Your LGBT History - Fame
Know Your LGBT History - Welcome Home, Bobby
Know Your LGBT History - Barney Miller
Know your lgbt history - The Jerry Springer Show
Know your lgbt history - Martin Lawrence and that 'gay guy' on his show
Know your lgbt history - The Ricki Lake Show
Know your lgbt history - Which Way Is Up
Know your lgbt history - Gays in Primetime Soaps
Know your lgbt history - Boys Beware
Know your lgbt history - The Boondocks
Know your lgbt history - Mannequin
Know your lgbt history - The Warriors
Know Your LGBT History - New York Undercover
Know Your LGBT History - Low Down Dirty Shame
Know Your LGBT History - Fortune and Men's Eyes
Know your lgbt history - California Suite
Know your lgbt history - Taxi (Elaine's Strange Triangle)
Know your lgbt history - Come Back Charleston Blue
Know your lgbt history - James Bond goes gay
Know your lgbt history - Windows
Know your lgbt history - To Wong Foo and Priscilla
Know your lgbt history - Blazing Saddles
Know your lgbt history - Sanford and Son
Know your lgbt history - In Living Color
Know your lgbt history - Cleopatra Jones and her lesbian drug lords
Know your lgbt history - Norman, Is That You?
Know your lgbt history - The 'Exotic' Adrian Street
Know your lgbt history - The Choirboys
Know your lgbt history - Eddie Murphy
Know your lgbt history - The Killing of Sister George
Know your lgbt history - Hanna-Barbera cartoons pushes the 'gay agenda
'Know your lgbt history - Cruising
Know your lgbt history - Foxy Brown and Cleopatra Jones
Know your lgbt history - I Got Da Hook Up
Know your lgbt history - Fright Night
Know your lgbt history - Flowers of Evil
The Jeffersons and the transgender community
.
Mark Patton (who later did come out as a gay man) portrays a teenager who is trying to keep from being possessed by serial killer Freddy Krueger.
Seriously though, with a plot so simple, why would someone think that this movie was gay? Well for starters, the character portrayed by Patton isn't the most masculine fellow in the world. It goes without saying that there were some scenes in which he reminded me of Sean Hayes from Will and Grace such as this one featuring him cleaning his room:
Then there is this scene where Freddy induces the young man to go to a club where he meets his coach (starting at 2:20):
It was the first time I discovered that white male booties can jiggle. LOL
Happy Fourth, folks
Past Know Your LGBT History postings
Know Your LGBT History - Noah's Arc
Know Your LGBT History - Ode to Billy Joe
Know Your LGBT History - Adorable Adrian Adonis
Know Your LGBT History - The Night Strangler
Know Your LGBT History - All in the Family
Know Your LGBT History - Tongues Untied
Know Your LGBT History - The Celluloid Closet
Know Your LGBT History - Querelle
Know Your LGBT History - Theatre of Blood
Know Your LGBT History - Strange Fruit
Know Your LGBT History - Designing Women
Know Your LGBT History - The Children's Hour
Know Your LGBT History - Sylvester
Know Your LGBT History - Once Bitten
Know Your LGBT History - The Boys in the Band
Know Your LGBT History - Christopher Morley, the crossdressing assassin
Know Your LGBT History - Midnight Cowboy
Know Your LGBT History - Dracula's Daughter
Know Your LGBT History - Blacula
Know Your LGBT History - 3 Strikes
Know Your LGBT History - Paris Is Burning
Know Your LGBT History - The Women
Know your LGBT History - Soul Plane
Know Your LGBT History - The Player's Club
Special Know Your LGBT History - Fame
Know Your LGBT History - Welcome Home, Bobby
Know Your LGBT History - Barney Miller
Know your lgbt history - The Jerry Springer Show
Know your lgbt history - Martin Lawrence and that 'gay guy' on his show
Know your lgbt history - The Ricki Lake Show
Know your lgbt history - Which Way Is Up
Know your lgbt history - Gays in Primetime Soaps
Know your lgbt history - Boys Beware
Know your lgbt history - The Boondocks
Know your lgbt history - Mannequin
Know your lgbt history - The Warriors
Know Your LGBT History - New York Undercover
Know Your LGBT History - Low Down Dirty Shame
Know Your LGBT History - Fortune and Men's Eyes
Know your lgbt history - California Suite
Know your lgbt history - Taxi (Elaine's Strange Triangle)
Know your lgbt history - Come Back Charleston Blue
Know your lgbt history - James Bond goes gay
Know your lgbt history - Windows
Know your lgbt history - To Wong Foo and Priscilla
Know your lgbt history - Blazing Saddles
Know your lgbt history - Sanford and Son
Know your lgbt history - In Living Color
Know your lgbt history - Cleopatra Jones and her lesbian drug lords
Know your lgbt history - Norman, Is That You?
Know your lgbt history - The 'Exotic' Adrian Street
Know your lgbt history - The Choirboys
Know your lgbt history - Eddie Murphy
Know your lgbt history - The Killing of Sister George
Know your lgbt history - Hanna-Barbera cartoons pushes the 'gay agenda
'Know your lgbt history - Cruising
Know your lgbt history - Foxy Brown and Cleopatra Jones
Know your lgbt history - I Got Da Hook Up
Know your lgbt history - Fright Night
Know your lgbt history - Flowers of Evil
The Jeffersons and the transgender community
.
FRC: Pray that God isn't mad at America because of THE GAYS, and other Friday midday news briefs
FRC's Call2Fall Hopes to Prevent God From Destroying America Due To Our "Sexual Immorality and Perversion" - Of all the nerve. The Family Research Council lies and misrepresents but yet will be praying to keep God from "destroying" America because of the supposed sins of lgbts. Pot meet kettle.
Robert George on Obama: Willfully Anti-Intellectual or Passively So? - In light of their embarrassing associations, NOM is still channeling the "waaaaaaaah! stop calling us bigots" line. Don't drag President Obama in your mess.
Las Vegas Church Stands By Martin Ssempa - Not only are they standing by Mr. Poo Poo but are also actively pushing his misrepresentations of the Ugandan anti-gay bill.
Google to Add Pay to Cover a Tax for Same-Sex Benefits - Excellent way to end the news posts.
Robert George on Obama: Willfully Anti-Intellectual or Passively So? - In light of their embarrassing associations, NOM is still channeling the "waaaaaaaah! stop calling us bigots" line. Don't drag President Obama in your mess.
Las Vegas Church Stands By Martin Ssempa - Not only are they standing by Mr. Poo Poo but are also actively pushing his misrepresentations of the Ugandan anti-gay bill.
Google to Add Pay to Cover a Tax for Same-Sex Benefits - Excellent way to end the news posts.
Tyler Perry is ANGRY with Boondocks episode
I was wondering when it was going to happen. And boy did it ever:
More here
I'm not saying a word.
Okay maybe just one little thing. Welcome to fame, Tyler.
Hat tip to Rod 2.0 Beta
Turner Broadcasting is trying to avoid a house of pain with producer Tyler Perry.
Perry, who has two shows on Turner's TBS cable channel ("House of Payne" and "Meet the Browns") was furious about a recent episode of the animated series "The Boondocks" that ran on Cartoon Network's Adult Swim programming block. Cartoon Network also is owned by Turner Broadcasting.
The episode in question -- "Pause" -- which first ran June 20, lampooned Perry, the creator of several hit movies, some of whom star him as Madea, an eccentric grandmother whose antics often land her in hot water. The show, which is executive produced by Aaron McGruder, who also created the now-defunct comic strip of the same name, featured a thinly veiled version of Perry named Winston Jerome. In the episode, Jerome is shown to be a closeted cross-dresser who uses religion to hide his lifestyle.
Soon after the episode aired, Perry got in touch with executives at Turner including entertainment chief Steve Koonin and Phil Kent, the chief executive of Turner Broadcasting. Perry complained loudly about the episode and even threatened to rethink his relationship with the company, people familiar with the situation said. A spokesman for Perry declined to comment.
Kent, who is a low-key executive but also a former talent agent, put his skills to work and acknowledged to Perry that the actor-producer should have been given a warning about the episode. The show, which has aired twice, is not scheduled to air again on Cartoon Network, although the company would not say if it has been banned from the channel.
More here
I'm not saying a word.
Okay maybe just one little thing. Welcome to fame, Tyler.
Hat tip to Rod 2.0 Beta
Lindsey Graham - 'I ain't gay.' Alvin McEwen: 'Thank God.'
SC Senator Lindsey Graham has addressed rumors that he is gay during an interview with The New York Times:
I'm going to overlook that ridiculous San Francisco reference. Don't get me wrong. Rumors have been dogging Graham since before he came a senator. Being a resident of South Carolina and an out (and highly pseudo prominent member of the SC's lgbt community), I have been privy to some juicy rumors - and not just about Graham.
And if it ever turned out that Graham was gay, I would be the first to talk about it, comment on it, joke about it, exploit it for my own literary purposes, etc.
But come on. Or better yet - and allow me to apologize for those who will get offended - eewwww.
Even if he were gay, I wouldn't date him. And I'm the one with an Evita Peron fascination.
Senator Lindsey Graham addressed rumors about being a homosexual in an interview with the New York Times.
According to the Times, Graham reportedly smirked and said: "I know it's really gonna upset a lot of gay men." "I'm sure hundreds of ‘em are gonna be jumping off the Golden Gate Bridge - but I ain't available. I ain't gay. Sorry."
I'm going to overlook that ridiculous San Francisco reference. Don't get me wrong. Rumors have been dogging Graham since before he came a senator. Being a resident of South Carolina and an out (and highly pseudo prominent member of the SC's lgbt community), I have been privy to some juicy rumors - and not just about Graham.
And if it ever turned out that Graham was gay, I would be the first to talk about it, comment on it, joke about it, exploit it for my own literary purposes, etc.
But come on. Or better yet - and allow me to apologize for those who will get offended - eewwww.
Even if he were gay, I wouldn't date him. And I'm the one with an Evita Peron fascination.
Thursday, July 01, 2010
What dummy chose Tony Perkins as a Congressional witness?
During Elena Kagan's confirmation hearing, one fact falling under the radars unfortunately are the witnesses invited to testify against her.
To be more specific, one witness in particular has a lot of people, including myself, asking "what the hell?"
Tony Perkins, head of the Family Research Center, has been called as a minority witness against Kagan, but to put it bluntly, whoever asked him to participate in the hearings would have been better off asking Bozo the Clown.
At least Bozo would have been more truthful.
Perkins and his group pride themselves with standing up for American values and "the family." However, as past incidents show, Perkins and FRC have a deceptive way of standing up for values.
Kristin Williams of faithinpubliclife.org sent out an excellent point by point breakdown of Perkins's problems with accuracy and truth, including:
Tony Perkins falsely claimed that overturning Don't Ask Don't Tell would lead to a military that "just does parades and stuff." While interviewing Sen. John McCain, Perkins said that "...the top militaries in the world do not allow homosexuality to be openly engaged in, in the military - I mean, if you want a military that just does parades and stuff like that then I guess that's okay." In reality, three of the United States' closest allies-Israel, Canada, and the United Kingdom- "have successfully removed all restrictions on gays and lesbians in their armed forces since the early 1990s."
Tony Perkins falsely claimed that homosexuality leads to child sexual abuse. In a statement responding to the Mark Foley scandal, Perkins said: "It shouldn't be totally surprising, when we hold up tolerance and diversity as the guideposts for public life, this is what you end up getting...the real issue...is the link between homosexuality and child sexual abuse." As numerous experts have demonstrated, there is no connection between sexual orientation and likeliness of sexually abusing children.
Tony Perkins' organization made false claims about the health care votes of two Members of Congress to justify targeting them in the upcoming election. FRC Action PAC lists 20 Democratic incumbents they're campaigning against as part of a "20 in 10" campaign this election cycle. FRC claims to oppose these representatives because of their votes for health care reform. But two of the members on the list, Reps. Nye and Minnick, actually voted against health care reform and FRC refuses to correct the mistake, suggesting not only a lack of integrity, but also a strong possibility that FRC's objectives are more focused on partisan gain for the Republican party than a response to health reform.
Williams includes other points, including Perkins's 2001 speech in front of a white supremacist group.
Personally I would like to take it further. Seems to me that anyone employed with FRC, Perkins included, has no business testifying in of Congress as credible witnesses.
FRC's senior analyst, Peter Sprigg, has expressed a desire to export lgbts out of the United States and outlawing "homsexual acts."
Then there are these following items:
November 23, 2009 - Family Research Council caught falsely accusing Congresswoman of religious bigotry - While not lgbt-oriented per se, this post demonstrates just how the Family Research Council will truncate a quote to push a false image of religious persecution.
November 18, 2009 - Video: FRC invited Chai to speak; now slicing both her footage and her back - Goodasyou.org shows how FRC used spliced footage to make the case against EEOC nominee Chai Feldblum.
October 27, 2009 - Family Research Council's coldhearted attack on lgbt senior citizens -In an ugly attack on lgbt seniors, the Family Research Council uses the work of the discredited researcher Paul Cameron (Editor's note - the Media Matters Action post inaccurately says that Cameron started the Family Research Council. While this is not true, the organization has a history of using his work, irregardless of his dubious history.)
October 26, 2009 - It's just good for FRC that crimes against truth aren't tracked - From Goodasyou.org comes another FRC distortion. This time, it's about hate crimes statistics.
October 21, 2009 - Family Research Council brags about ability to fool 80,000 people - FRC pushes the lie that hate crimes legislation will "silence" Christians.
October 1, 2009 - Family Research Council head misrepresents credible information to hurt ENDA - In testimony against ENDA, FRC head Tony Perkins uses anecdotes and distorts a study on lgbt health.
And as Perkins's already published online testimony clearly shows, he is going the "Kagan supports the radical homosexual agenda so she should never serve on the Supreme Court" route.
Let me be clear here. My problem lies with not only with the consistent way Perkins and FRC have manipulated legitimate studies, created false studies, and basically out-and-out stigmatized and defamed the lgbt community but also with the fact that someone in Congress- someone who makes decisions having to do with the lives of everyone in this country, including the lives of lgbts - felt that somehow Perkins was credible enough to give an opinion and have that opinion taken seriously.
And this is not the first time it has happened. Family Research Council employees have been Congressional witnesses as recent as last month.
It underscores just how disrespected the lgbt community are in some people's eyes.
If Perkins had maligned African-Americans or the Jewish community with the same vigor as he maligns lgbts, no one would dare bring up his name as a Congressional witness.
But as long as he can throw out the phrase "family values" a couple of times and lgbts don't get angry enough to make any noise over this obvious show of disrespect, my guess is that Perkins will be invited for more hearings.
Hat tip to Pam's House Blend.
Will pro-gay ruling lead to 'End Times?' and other Thursday midday news briefs
Lou Engle, Continuing the Delusion, Says SCOTUS Decision May Signal End Times - Lord give me strength, part 2
U.S. Starts To Mimic Third World Conditions For Access to AIDS Meds - Folks, this aint'good.
Ban to keep lesbian partner away in custody case is struck down - This reverses the opinion of an "activist judge." Where is the religious right complaining about HIM?
Quinn signs anti-bullying legislation into law - Not bad. Not bad at all.
HUD announces policy guidance addressing LGBT discrimination in housing - Good and bad as Pam Spaulding will tell you.
Carcieri vetoes bill to expand R.I. hate crimes law - Override that $!#@
U.S. Starts To Mimic Third World Conditions For Access to AIDS Meds - Folks, this aint'good.
Ban to keep lesbian partner away in custody case is struck down - This reverses the opinion of an "activist judge." Where is the religious right complaining about HIM?
Quinn signs anti-bullying legislation into law - Not bad. Not bad at all.
HUD announces policy guidance addressing LGBT discrimination in housing - Good and bad as Pam Spaulding will tell you.
Carcieri vetoes bill to expand R.I. hate crimes law - Override that $!#@
Religious right tantrums because of lgbt families
I rarely read the to-the-right-of Atilla The Hun publication The Washington Times but an item today regarding President Obama and the lgbt community caught my eye:
I got the item from Daily Kos who summed the piece up rather nicely:
And to me, it's not just The Washington Times. Over the past week and a half since Obama issued his lgbt family-inclusive Father's Day proclamation, conservative and religious right groups have voiced their disagreement - and not in the sly semantical terms which so many lgbts have gotten used to.
These folks have been very vocal , very ridiculous, and very rude in terms of how they define lgbt families. It should be something which gets one upset until one realizes what's happening here.
These folks are throwing a tantrum. No matter how flowery the language they use, or how they try to fake being upstanding and moral, it all comes down to the image of a spoiled child kicking and screaming simply because he can't get his way.
Mr. Obama expressed his support for such priorities by using his Father's Day proclamation to elevate the status of homosexual "families" as if they could rear our youth just as well as a traditional family consisting of a mom (female) and dad (male). "Nurturing families come in many forms, and children may be raised by a father and mother, a single father, two fathers, a stepfather, a grandfather or caring guardian," he wrote.
Kids with two mommies and two daddies happens to be the goal of the Labor Department's latest policy. The department is using the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) to force companies to accept up to 12 weeks of leave every year for homosexual couples that adopt children. The Obama administration issued a ruling that modified the definition of "son or daughter" so that homosexual couples could take extra time off to "bond with that child." The change is designed to appeal to fringe, left-wing activists. "The Labor Department's action today sends a clear message to workers and employers alike: All families, including LGBT families, are protected by the FMLA," Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis explained in a June 22 statement.
Mr. Obama's policies are undermining the foundation of the family itself. For the long-term good of the country, members of Congress should take note of what's happening and act to undo the radical social agenda.
I got the item from Daily Kos who summed the piece up rather nicely:
The Washington Times editorial board is nuts.
And to me, it's not just The Washington Times. Over the past week and a half since Obama issued his lgbt family-inclusive Father's Day proclamation, conservative and religious right groups have voiced their disagreement - and not in the sly semantical terms which so many lgbts have gotten used to.
These folks have been very vocal , very ridiculous, and very rude in terms of how they define lgbt families. It should be something which gets one upset until one realizes what's happening here.
These folks are throwing a tantrum. No matter how flowery the language they use, or how they try to fake being upstanding and moral, it all comes down to the image of a spoiled child kicking and screaming simply because he can't get his way.
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Gay Rights, Special Rights - A nauseating history lesson
Take enterprising anti-gay film company, footage from various parades, comments taken out of context, and you have a history lesson which is sorely needed.
Gay Rights, Special Rights - which is still selling in various places - is a vile documentary created by Jeremiah Films in conjunction with the Traditional Values Coalition in the 1990s. It was partly designed to drive a wedge between the lgbt and African-American communities.
Though this video is over 20 years old, it needs to be viewed and discussed. It needs to be particularly viewed by the young lgbts so they can get a sense of where we have come from.
Things have gotten much better for us, but we should never forget how it was and the fact that those who wanted it that way are still around.
Doctor testing to 'prevent' lesbianism and other Wednesday midday news briefs
Doctor testing drug to ‘prevent’ lesbianism, interest in ‘male careers’ - If I had not read it with my own eyes, I wouldn't have believed it.
Reeling it back, hoping we were born yesterday - National Organization for Marriage (NOM) now playing damage control.
NOM Strategist Louis Marinelli's Hate Speech Moratorium Not Going So Well - But the man in the center of the NOM controversy just can't shut up.
Related post - Message to Maggie Gallagher: associating with bigots does make you a bigot
The Hypocrisy At The Heart Of The Right's Complaints About "Judicial Activism" - Isn't hypocrisy the heart of a lot of things they do?
TWO Special Report: ‘The Stealth Bombers Meeting’ [Dispatches from Lou Engle's Gateway House of Prayer 6/22/10] - What is it about lgbts which make some people go bonkers?
Mike Huckabee Ties Marriage Equality to Gay Sexual Acts - Or as I call it -The Lament of the Homophobe. They think every lgbt issue has to do with sexual intercourse. It's pitiful, really.
Reeling it back, hoping we were born yesterday - National Organization for Marriage (NOM) now playing damage control.
NOM Strategist Louis Marinelli's Hate Speech Moratorium Not Going So Well - But the man in the center of the NOM controversy just can't shut up.
Related post - Message to Maggie Gallagher: associating with bigots does make you a bigot
The Hypocrisy At The Heart Of The Right's Complaints About "Judicial Activism" - Isn't hypocrisy the heart of a lot of things they do?
TWO Special Report: ‘The Stealth Bombers Meeting’ [Dispatches from Lou Engle's Gateway House of Prayer 6/22/10] - What is it about lgbts which make some people go bonkers?
Mike Huckabee Ties Marriage Equality to Gay Sexual Acts - Or as I call it -The Lament of the Homophobe. They think every lgbt issue has to do with sexual intercourse. It's pitiful, really.
Forget the language, Porn Pete. You're just plain offensive
Fulfilling the very definition of the word "bottom feeding," our old friend Peter LaBarbera is trying to attach himself to the judicial hearings of Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan:
No, I will not link to the report, “How Elena Kagan Helped “Queer” Harvard Law School (Will she now help “queer” the US Supreme Court’s decisions?), because like all other things of Mass Resistance - an SPLC labeled hate group - it's a homophobic hot mess.
I've talked about Mass Resistance on several occasions because the organization has a long history of demonizing the lgbt community and even stooping to coordinating phony moral panics, including:
Manufacturing a phony panic about "schools teaching children about homosexuality,"
Making a claim in 2006 that "gays were trying to get legislation passed to allow sex with animals" in Massachusetts,
Continuing a vindictive campaign of misinformation against the transgendered community (whom the organization refers to as "men in dresses),
Creating a venomous smear campaign against Obama appointee Kevin Jennings
But hey, Mike Huckabee likes them.
And the person LaBarbera has been working with - Amy Contrada - is a real gem. Inside lgbt circles in Massachusetts she is known for an interesting, but disgusting incident during a 2007 Youth Pride Celebration in Boston:
Love the company you keep, Peter.
For the last few weeks I’ve been working with Mass Resistance’s Amy Contrada, who has pulled together a wealth of information about Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan’s time at Harvard University, where she served as Dean of the Law School. Many will be shocked at just how extreme Harvard has become — and the radical sexual/gender policies advanced by Kagan. Kudos to Contrada and our friends at Mass Resistance for doing the reporting that most in the liberal media refuse to do (because too many agree with Kagan’s left-wing social agenda).
No, I will not link to the report, “How Elena Kagan Helped “Queer” Harvard Law School (Will she now help “queer” the US Supreme Court’s decisions?), because like all other things of Mass Resistance - an SPLC labeled hate group - it's a homophobic hot mess.
I've talked about Mass Resistance on several occasions because the organization has a long history of demonizing the lgbt community and even stooping to coordinating phony moral panics, including:
Manufacturing a phony panic about "schools teaching children about homosexuality,"
Making a claim in 2006 that "gays were trying to get legislation passed to allow sex with animals" in Massachusetts,
Continuing a vindictive campaign of misinformation against the transgendered community (whom the organization refers to as "men in dresses),
Creating a venomous smear campaign against Obama appointee Kevin Jennings
But hey, Mike Huckabee likes them.
And the person LaBarbera has been working with - Amy Contrada - is a real gem. Inside lgbt circles in Massachusetts she is known for an interesting, but disgusting incident during a 2007 Youth Pride Celebration in Boston:
After Youth Pride Amy headed over to the BAGLY Prom where she showed her true colors. When Trevor Wright, organizer for the Prom and blogger for QueerToday, yelled at her to move she became infuriated. During their interaction, Amy hastily asked Trevor if he knew what "cum vomit" was. She insisted she read about "cum vomit" on the GLSEN web site, and that we were brainwashing young people to be "crazed homosexuals."
Later she claimed that there was no real difference between a pedophile and a homosexual. She insisted sex and "depravity" were going on inside the BAGLY Prom, and demanded to be allowed inside. The obvious truth is there is an adult volunteer for every 10 youth in the Prom, and as the BAGLY web site indicates all sex, drugs, and violence are banned.
Love the company you keep, Peter.
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
An interesting and thought-provoking take on lgbt pride
An interesting and thought-provoking video on lgbt pride from the folks at infomania. Watch, learn and feel free to comment.
Only one problem. The part about Eminem totally omitted his tendency to show his ass.
I mean come on now. I'm not saying anything about Eminem's sexual orientation but I've seen his ass more times than those of all five of my boyfriends combined.
Just saying . . .
Past infomania posts:
Elena Kagan 'plays softball like a lesbian'
Conversion Therapy - a video with George Rekers in mind
Advice to closeted politicans - How to keep from being exposed
Why the phrase 'No Homo' is highly needed
Reasons why the 'sanctity' of proms MUST be preserved from Constance McMillen
Why gay marriage is 'wrong'
Montana GOP wants to outlaw 'homosexual acts' and other Tuesday midday news briefs
Montana GOP seeks to ‘keep homosexual acts illegal.' - These folks think about sex more than me.
Kagan: A Fake John Roberts, A Radical Homosexualist, and a Sign of The End Times - The far right's version of the Elena Kagan hearing. Lawd, give us all strength!
Christian chaplain and crack team to investigate little girls’ room goings-on - and it gets worse. Imagine Mass Resistance, Peter LaBarbera, and several other religious right nuts teaming up to stop Kagan by "investigating her." Talk about your Legion of Doom without the sense of coolness.
FYI: They're watching - When religious right groups make errors or are shown to be hypocrites, there is no such thing as a public mea culpa for them. They make "changes" when they think no one is watching.
Credibility FAIL: FRC's Tony Perkins to testify during Kagan confirmation hearing - By the time some of you read this, he will have probably already testified. But the question remains what in the hell is this man who should have no credibility at all doing testifying in front of Congress?
Kagan: A Fake John Roberts, A Radical Homosexualist, and a Sign of The End Times - The far right's version of the Elena Kagan hearing. Lawd, give us all strength!
Christian chaplain and crack team to investigate little girls’ room goings-on - and it gets worse. Imagine Mass Resistance, Peter LaBarbera, and several other religious right nuts teaming up to stop Kagan by "investigating her." Talk about your Legion of Doom without the sense of coolness.
FYI: They're watching - When religious right groups make errors or are shown to be hypocrites, there is no such thing as a public mea culpa for them. They make "changes" when they think no one is watching.
Credibility FAIL: FRC's Tony Perkins to testify during Kagan confirmation hearing - By the time some of you read this, he will have probably already testified. But the question remains what in the hell is this man who should have no credibility at all doing testifying in front of Congress?
Cuccinelli: 14th amendment not designed to protect lgbts
Maybe Virginia's attorney general, Ken Cuccinelli, just plain don't like lgbts.
From ThinkProgress:
In March, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli (R) told the state’s colleges and universities to rescind policies that ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, arguing that schools have no legal authority to adopt such statements. On Friday, Cuccinelli appeared at Boys State, where a high school student asked him, “How is that not a violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment?” Cuccinelli responded by suggesting that the amendment was not designed to protect gay men and women:
I feel safe in saying that Cuccinelli's statement goes so far that I don't envision any religious right head or organization coming to his defense. But man, wouldn't it be fun if they tried!
Igor Volsky of ThinkProgess's Wonk Room disputes Cuccinelli's statement and does it very well:
From ThinkProgress:
In March, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli (R) told the state’s colleges and universities to rescind policies that ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, arguing that schools have no legal authority to adopt such statements. On Friday, Cuccinelli appeared at Boys State, where a high school student asked him, “How is that not a violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment?” Cuccinelli responded by suggesting that the amendment was not designed to protect gay men and women:
“State universities are not free to create any specially protected classes other than those dictated by the General Assembly,” Cuccinelli said. “Your question is, why is that not a violation of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause. Frankly, the category of sexual orientation would never have been contemplated by the people who wrote and voted for and passed the 14th Amendment,” he said.
“There are judges who think these things ‘evolve,’ is the word they like to use,” Cuccinelli said, but the correct approach to making such a change would be a constitutional amendment, he said.
I feel safe in saying that Cuccinelli's statement goes so far that I don't envision any religious right head or organization coming to his defense. But man, wouldn't it be fun if they tried!
Igor Volsky of ThinkProgess's Wonk Room disputes Cuccinelli's statement and does it very well:
It’s certainly true that the authors of the 14th amendment may not have “contemplated” protecting gay people from discrimination, but the Supreme Court has. Despite Cuccinelli’s rather arrogant attempts to dismiss legal precedent and impose his own vision of the Constitution on America, the Court has found that laws motivated solely by anti-gay animus are unconstitutional — and Cuccinelli is bound by that case whether “the people who wrote and voted for and passed the 14th Amendment” “contemplated” about gays or not.
In 1996’s Romer v. Evans the court ruled that a Colorado law called Amendment 2, which rescinded recently anti-discrimination measures, violated the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause because animus towards a certain group of people does not constitute “a legitimate governmental purpose.”
“‘[I]f the constitutional conception of `equal protection of the laws’ means anything, it must at the very least mean that a bare . . . desire to harm a politically unpopular group cannot constitute a legitimate governmental interest.’ Department of Agriculture v. Moreno, 413 U.S. 528, 534 (1973),” the Court wrote. “Amendment 2, however, in making a general announcement that gays and lesbians shall not have any particular protections from the law, inflicts on them immediate, continuing, and real injuries that outrun and belie any legitimate justifications that may be claimed for it.”
Monday, June 28, 2010
Message to Maggie Gallagher: associating with bigots does make you a bigot
Gay marriage advocates believe there isn't any difference between two men in a sexual union and a husband and wife, and those of us who see this difference are blinded by hatred and prejudice. They delegitimize opponents, brand us as haters, and then try to strip us of our rights. - Maggie Gallagher, The Core Civil Right to Vote for Marriage
The shtick of Maggie Gallagher, founder of the anti-gay National Organization for Marriage, is to play the victim.
She consistently whines that people like herself and her organization are being unfairly attacked and called "bigots" simply because they want to defend the supposedly "time-honored" belief that marriage is between a man and a woman.
Her constant complaints are really nothing more than a cynical ploy to divert attention away from the fact that in reality she has no logical arguments to oppose marriage equality.
And it reveals an ugly degree of selfishness indicative of many who oppose marriage equality. In Gallagher's world, it's not the lgbt couples being denied their rights that matter, but only herself and those like her who stand against marriage equality while claiming to be besieged and scandalized by "pushy, aggressive, radical homosexual activists."
However, if Gallagher wants to continue this charade, she really should address the company that she keeps and supports such as The Traditional Values Coalition, who is listed as an anti-gay hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
And bear in mind that this distinction isn't simply because the group believes that homosexuality is a sin. According to SPLC, anti-gay hate groups:
. . . have engaged in the crudest type of name-calling, describing homosexuals as "perverts" with "filthy habits" who seek to snatch the children of straight parents and "convert" them to gay sex. They have disseminated disparaging "facts" about gays that are simply untrue — assertions that are remarkably reminiscent of the way white intellectuals and scientists once wrote about the "bestial" black man and his supposedly threatening sexuality.
When it comes to this description, TVC passes with flying colors. Among other things, the organization has:
claimed that the passage of ENDA would lead to the sexual abuse of disabled veterans,
continued to intentionally mix the term "sexual orientation" with "paraphilias" in another attempt to lie about ENDA,
used bad research in YET another attempt to lie about ENDA, including distorting marketing statistics, and
claimed that a repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell is a bad idea by asking, amongst other silly questions, how would the military " handle sodomy in battlefield situations,"
Yet this is the same group which Gallagher's group (NOM) freely cited as a credible source in regards to a recent Republican primary in California.
And now via Goodasyou.org and blogger Matt Algren comes news that NOM has been aligning itself with one Louis J. Marinelli III.
Marinelli identifies himself as a "NOM strategist" and will also be working on the organization's 2010 Summer for Marriage Tour.
He is also a man who has never met an anti-gay distortion he didn't like. According to Goodasyou.org, his past tweets have been very interesting:
there was a retweet that declared all gays to be single. There was the time that Mr. Marinelli said that Peter LaBarbera and his fringe "Americans For Truth" group merely "tell the truth about homosexuality." There was the determination that marriage equality is "a mockery and a hijacking of the civil rights movement." There were times when he flat-out called us an abomination, citing Leviticus. There was this one: "Deviance" describes actions or behaviours that violate cultural norms - homosexuality is far from a cultural norm. Therefore, it is deviant." And this: "Homosexuality and gay marriage are wrong and harmful to society." And this: "#iaintafraidtosay that there shouldn't be any recognition of homosexual relationships because that is saying that homosexuality is OK." There was this one, accompanied by a smile: "What they do is blantantly [sic] immoral. :)" There were times when Mr. Marinelli compared our unions to that which might exist between a sterile brother and sister. And other times when our very character was assaulted: "#nevertrust activists of the homosexual agenda - they are deceitful people who care only about themselves and not what's best for society."
And Marinelli also creates anti-gay videos including one in which he claims that:
. . . the homosexual agenda is really about the 3 Ps: prostitution, pedophilia, and polygamy.
Gallagher has no room to claim that the she is unfairly being called a bigot when she and her organization chooses to associate with those who freely and unapologetically stigmatize the lgbt community.
It's the equivalent of beaning people with rocks and then hiding your hands when they come to investigate.
In their zeal to defend the "time-honored" definition of marriage, Gallagher and company seems to have forgotten the "time-honored" definitions of truth and integrity.
Big hat tip to Goodasyou.org and blogger Matt Algren.
UPDATE - Marinelli's video was public until learlier today when it was "suddenly" marked as private, which means only Marinelli's youtube friends can view it.
Supreme Court ruling WILL make the religious right see red and other Monday midday news briefs
Anti-Bias Rules Upheld - BAM! Supreme Court rules that public colleges and universities may require religious organizations seeking recognition or funds as campus groups to comply with anti-bias rules.
Gay man claims Parkersburg officers beat him -In MY state of South Carolina? There will be more about this as news filters in. Apparently this happened in Charleston, WV. Still it's an ugly incident.
'Wow, what a long engagement that was!' - True love DEFINITELY waits.
If You Can't Beat 'Em, Outbreed 'Em - You just KNOW that the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer includes the lgbt community in this diatribe. But doesn't he know that heterosexual parents create lgbt children?
Gee thanks, Kansas City Star - No wonder we can't get the media to cover SC Black Pride. There isn't anyone running around "nekkid"!
Gay man claims Parkersburg officers beat him -
'Wow, what a long engagement that was!' - True love DEFINITELY waits.
If You Can't Beat 'Em, Outbreed 'Em - You just KNOW that the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer includes the lgbt community in this diatribe. But doesn't he know that heterosexual parents create lgbt children?
Gee thanks, Kansas City Star - No wonder we can't get the media to cover SC Black Pride. There isn't anyone running around "nekkid"!
The Boondocks makes fun of 'going to prison and getting anally raped'
I semi-forgave the television show The Boondocks for it's homoerotic take down of African-American playwright Tyler Perry last week.
This week's episode, A Date With The Booty Warrior, may be a bit more difficult to forgive.
In this episode, Tom Dubois, a character in The Boondocks, takes several students to jail as a part of the "Scared Straight" program, where inmates warn troubled students to either change their ways or end up in jail.
Problem is that in this particular program, the inmates are more concerned with telling the students about raping and being raped in prison.
I won't even talk about the peanut butter and jelly scene.
One of the prisoners is shown in this opening scene raping Chris Hansen of To Catch A Predator:
Now two other things complicate this scenario:
A. Tom Dubois has a serious fear of - in the words of the series - "going to prison and being anally raped."
B. The inmates decide to start a rebellion. In the middle of this rebellion the prisoner in the above sequence decides to go after Tom:
I understand comedy is sometimes x-rated and I really do like the Boondocks, but is making fun of male rape appropriate?
What do you think?
UPDATE - It turns out that Tom's nemesis is based upon this man:
This week's episode, A Date With The Booty Warrior, may be a bit more difficult to forgive.
In this episode, Tom Dubois, a character in The Boondocks, takes several students to jail as a part of the "Scared Straight" program, where inmates warn troubled students to either change their ways or end up in jail.
Problem is that in this particular program, the inmates are more concerned with telling the students about raping and being raped in prison.
I won't even talk about the peanut butter and jelly scene.
One of the prisoners is shown in this opening scene raping Chris Hansen of To Catch A Predator:
Now two other things complicate this scenario:
A. Tom Dubois has a serious fear of - in the words of the series - "going to prison and being anally raped."
B. The inmates decide to start a rebellion. In the middle of this rebellion the prisoner in the above sequence decides to go after Tom:
I understand comedy is sometimes x-rated and I really do like the Boondocks, but is making fun of male rape appropriate?
What do you think?
UPDATE - It turns out that Tom's nemesis is based upon this man:
Sunday, June 27, 2010
Horrible case of abuse highlights the cluelessness of 'pro-family' groups
The recent CNN special report Gary and Tony Have a Baby - about a gay couple seeking to adopt a child - is the subject of much discussion. While some in the lgbt community either praised it for showcasing lgbt families or criticized it for not enough diversity, some religious right leaders have been extremely negative with their comments.
Such as Family Research Council's Tony Perkins:
Actually, Perkins continues to delude readers. He bastardizes the studies which compared two-parent heterosexual households to single parent heterosexual households to make a phony judgment on same-sex households.
He doesn't tell his readership that other studies, including the recent peer-reviewed one on lesbian households which Perkins and other religious right leaders have been attempting like mad to debunk, clearly shows that living in a same-sex household doesn't negatively affect a child.
But a recent horrific story of abuse highlights the intentional cluelessness of not only Perkins but others who rail against same-sex households while unfairly pushing up the "Ozzie and Harriet" model of family:
But since this is a heterosexual household, you won't be hearing anything from the FRC about it. And this is a shame. You see in this case, some neighbors were quoted as saying that they blame themselves for either not paying attention to what was going on or not getting involved when they suspected the abuse.
Will Perkins send out an action alert advising his readership to report anything they suspect as child abuse with as much fervor as he attacks a gay couple for daring to adopt a child?
Probably not.
For that matter, other than implying that same-sex households are dangerous for child, the Family Research Council, to my knowledge, never done anything in regards to fighting or speaking out against child abuse, domestic violence, or any other problems that would actually harm a child's home environment.
My mistake. There is an interesting report on the organization's web page which advocates spanking a child.
Such as Family Research Council's Tony Perkins:
Equally tragic, one of the men said that no one has ever given him a reason why their lifestyle choice is harmful. Here’s one–they are deliberately and permanently depriving this child of a mother. CNN seems content to tug at the heartstrings rather than report the news. They imply that the “love” or affection that these men feel for each other and for the baby that they’ve manufactured is enough. Love is important, but it isn’t sufficient. Social science proves that children suffer from not having a married mom and dad, so why is CNN promoting two people who would deliberately put their baby in that situation?
Actually, Perkins continues to delude readers. He bastardizes the studies which compared two-parent heterosexual households to single parent heterosexual households to make a phony judgment on same-sex households.
He doesn't tell his readership that other studies, including the recent peer-reviewed one on lesbian households which Perkins and other religious right leaders have been attempting like mad to debunk, clearly shows that living in a same-sex household doesn't negatively affect a child.
But a recent horrific story of abuse highlights the intentional cluelessness of not only Perkins but others who rail against same-sex households while unfairly pushing up the "Ozzie and Harriet" model of family:
A California couple were charged with child abuse after police said they hit, starved and tied up the woman's two sons.If this had been a same-sex household, Perkins and company would be putting out press releases, being interviewed for either One News Now or Fox News, and sending out action alerts.
Cheryl Ann Stuart and Mario Alberto Colin of Santa Ana, Ca, allegedly caused malnutrition and dehydration to the two boys, aged 2 ½ and 5. The younger of the two boys had lips so dry and cracked that they bled, and his head was severely bruised, the Associated Press reported.
"She tied the kids to their beds using bandages, shoelaces or chains to keep them from taking off while she slept," Cpl. Anthony Bertagna, a spokesman for Santa Ana police told the AP. "She didn't feed the boys, especially the 2-year-old, because she was potty-training him" and was tired of changing his soiled sheets.
Stuart was giving the children two cups of water a day. She admitted to beating the two children, but said she didn't' think she was striking them excessively hard.
Colin is not the father of the two boys. He is married, with two children of his own. His wife did not even know of Colin's affair with Stuart.
But since this is a heterosexual household, you won't be hearing anything from the FRC about it. And this is a shame. You see in this case, some neighbors were quoted as saying that they blame themselves for either not paying attention to what was going on or not getting involved when they suspected the abuse.
Will Perkins send out an action alert advising his readership to report anything they suspect as child abuse with as much fervor as he attacks a gay couple for daring to adopt a child?
Probably not.
For that matter, other than implying that same-sex households are dangerous for child, the Family Research Council, to my knowledge, never done anything in regards to fighting or speaking out against child abuse, domestic violence, or any other problems that would actually harm a child's home environment.
My mistake. There is an interesting report on the organization's web page which advocates spanking a child.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



