Thursday, July 08, 2010

Court declares part of federal gay marriage ban unconstitutional, religious right freakout imminent




How is this for a pleasant shocker:

In an enormous victory for same-sex marriage, a federal judge in Boston today (Thursday, July 8) ruled, in two separate cases, that a critical part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional.

In one challenge brought by the state of Massachusetts, Judge Joseph Tauro ruled that Congress violated the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution when it passed DOMA and took from the states decisions concerning which couples can be considered married. In the other, Gill v. Office of Personnel Management, he ruled DOMA violates the equal protection principles embodied in the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Health and Human Services, Tauro considered whether the federal law’s definition of marriage -- one man and one woman -- violates state sovereignty by treating some couples with Massachusetts’ marriage licenses differently than others. In Gill v. Office of Personnel Management, Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), a gay legal group, asked Tauro to consider whether DOMA violates the right of eight same-sex couples to equal protection of the law. Both cases were argued, separately, in May, and the decision released today is a relatively quick turnaround, given that some judges take almost a year to decide cases.

GLAD attorney Mary Bonauto told Tauro that DOMA constitutes a "classic equal protection" violation, by taking one class of married people in Massachusetts and dividing it into two. One class, she noted, gets federal benefits, the other does not. Just as the federal government cannot take the word "person" and say it means only Caucasians or only women, said Bonauto, it should not be able to take the word "marriage" and say it means only heterosexual couples. Bonauto said the government has no reason to withhold the more than 1,000 federal benefits of marriage from same-sex couples, and noted that a House Judiciary Committee report "explicitly stated the purpose of DOMA was to express moral disapproval of homosexuality."

Maura T. Healey, chief of the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Civil Rights Division, told Judge Tauro that Section 3 of DOMA -- the section that limits the definition of marriage for federal benefits to straight couples -- violates the state’s right under the federal constitution to sovereign authority to define and regulate the marital status of its residents. Healey called DOMA an "animus-based national marriage law" that intrudes on core state authority and "forces the state to discriminate against its own citizens."

More here.

And we know what is going to happen next. Various religious right groups will be throwing out terms like "activist judges" and the "sanctity of marriage." I'm already expecting to be hit by a barrage of press releases and requests for money from the Family Research Council.

Then again, the way they have been going, I'm expecting a seriously hysterical screed about how this decision will lead to abortions, pedophilia, and wanton chaos.

You know - the usual things they accuse us of.

But it's a different ball field than it was when DOMA was first passed and it's definitely a different ball field than it was in 2004 when these groups were able to exploit marriage equality to get George Bush re-elected.

It's about time, too.


Bookmark and Share

Crist endorses gay adoption and other Thursday midday news briefs

Crist tepidly endorses gay adoption - Thanks a lot . . . I guess.

Breaking: "At this time SLDN cannot recommend that LGB service members participate in any survey" - It's the story of the morning. Pam Spaulding gives the low down.

Judge rules against lesbian VA employee - Well that sucks.

Dear Andrea: Yes, NOM censors! - And just so you need more proof of the National Organization for Marriage's hypocrisy.

Republicans More Likely to be Caught in Sex Scandals, And Their Scandals Are More Likely to be Gay - Damn the progressives! I need me a Republican!


Bookmark and Share

Tyler Perry: I am not suing The Boondocks



Director Tyler Perry has reportedly spoken out about the episode of the animated series The Boondocks that skewered him, his movies, and plays by portraying him as a cross-dressing in-the-closet gay man who exploits Christianity to get laid:

"Just like the Spike Lee situation, I feel that 'no response' is the best response. I'm just gonna leave it at that... But I will tell you this ... there is absolutely no truth to the rumor that I'm suing The Boondocks. Those are all lies. I'm not suing anybody over that. And I haven't fired anyone because of that show, either. I don't know where all that came from."

I felt it was a classy retort by Perry. Unfortunately I also feel that he seems to subscribe to the Donnie McClurkin school of misdirection because he did not address the claim that he threatened to sever his relationship with Turner Broadcasting.

Turner Broadcasting owns TBS, which airs Perry's shows House of Payne and Meet the Browns. The company also owns the Cartoon Network, which airs The Boondocks.

Related post:

Tyler Perry is ANGRY with Boondocks episode



Hat tip to Rod 2.0 Beta.

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, July 07, 2010

Robert Knight gets too homophobic even for me

There are times when religious right figures say things so nastily homophobic, so unbelievable that it's a waste to decipher the comment.

The only thing you can do is just allow the comment to speak for itself.

Today's piece by Coral Ridge Ministry writer (and perennial anti-gay) Robert Knight on DADT in the Washington Times is a perfect example. Here is a choice morsel:

Forcing open homosexuality on the armed forces would destroy the volunteer military and bring back the compulsory draft. Since women are now deployed close to combat, and the only legal reason they are not eligible is their combat exemption, a new draft could include our daughters. And some would face pressure to have on-base abortions in order to complete their tours of duty.

Chaplains would be the first victims of Mr. Obama's homosexualization of the military, followed by anyone who violated "zero tolerance" policies for homosexual acceptance. Bible-believing Christians would quickly find themselves unwelcome in Barney Frank's new pansexual, cross-dressing military.

Other fallout includes family housing, reduction in retention, recruitment and unit cohesion, an increase in homosexual sexual assaults and a boost to overturning the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

He forgot the rampant cannibalism and forced tattooing. Or does that come later? I wouldn't know because national headquarters hasn't sent me the latest copy of the "Gay Agenda" as of yet.

It's not surprising to hear Knight go off the deep end about lgbts. After all, what else can one expect from a man who freely cites the work of the discredited Paul Cameron; a man who believes that gays wallow in feces when we aren't sticking gerbils up our rear ends.

I have an interesting story about Knight and Cameron which I recounted in my 2007 book Holy Bullies and Headless Monsters. I had the distinct (dis)pleasure of meeting Knight at the University of South Carolina in 2004. I was able to point blank ask him why does he use the work of the discredited Cameron.

His answer to me was, and I quote:

“Yes we have used his research. So what?”

And this is the guy who is supposed help preserve "Christian values?"

All I can say is that if Knight ever becomes involved in some type of "rentboy" scandal, I will be the first to ship him to one of those ex-gay camps.

After all, we can't let just anybody in the lgbt community.

Hat tip to Media Matters.



Bookmark and Share

Ugandan beheading tragedy a hoax? and other Wednesday midday news briefs

Scam Alert: Uganda Beheading Story Revealed As A Hoax - Box Turtle Bulletin gives the 4-1-1.

Strategist Lou 'gays want polygamy, pedophilia, and prostitution' Marinelli begins official NOM duties - National Organization for (don't call us bigots) Marriage aligns itself with a bigot.

Today Show Petitioned to Include Gays in its Wedding Contest - I'm all for this.

Georgia Federal Court Rules For Trans Woman on Sex Discrimination Claim - Excellent news!

WorldNetDaily Has a New Lady Bigot Named D.J. Dolce - This woman is VILE!

Bookmark and Share

Anti-gay principal retires, remains ignorant as dirt

In my home state of South Carolina, Irmo High School principal Eddie Walker retired as of last week.

Two years ago, Walker created an ugly controversy when he threatened to resign when the school board told him that he would have to allow gay/straight alliance at Irmo High School.

Walker claimed that the club was about sex and he felt students would be harmed because of it.

After a huge ado, the club was started, but the school board established a sort of opt-in policy so that parents could have a say about what clubs their children could - or in this case - couldn't join.

Walker, by the way, changed his mind about resigning. I hear it was for "economic reasons."

Early this morning (we are talking between five and seven a.m.), he had an interview with WIS-TV where he supposedly "spoke for the first time" about the controversy.

At least that's what was hyped. What was also hyped was a "personal confession" by Walker.

The interview was crap, though not through the fault of the interviewer. There is only so much one can do with a less than a two-minute interview. No probing questions were asked -only a soliloquy of Walker repeating the same nonsense he voiced two years ago.

About how he loved the students. About how he felt the club was about sex and it would damage children. About his claim to have a "Biblical perspective."

Walker also said he felt that people choose to be gay. And the "personal confession?" Walker said he had a gay uncle and the "lifestyle" damaged him.

And let's not forget the prerequisite statement of homophobes - so that you don't think that they are homophobes - he "loves homosexuals."

All and all the interview added up to a minute and a half of my life which should have been spent in bed.

Never in my life have I seen such an ignorant, oblivious individual who seems to have learned nothing after two years.

At the time of the controversy, I said that Walker exacerbated the controversy by automatically branding the organization a "sex club" without actually talking to the students who wanted to start the organization.

I had hoped that since that time, he would have taken it upon himself to learn more about the importance of gay/straight alliances.

Sadly I was mistaken.

Unfortunately Walker seems to be indicative of so many claiming to have a "Biblical worldview" i.e. using religion to justify fear, ignorance, and being bullheaded.

It's really not anything to be proud of, especially when you are in a position like Walker was.

No matter how he and others who support try to sugarcoat his career, the legacy of Eddie Walker will be because of his personal beliefs, he turned his back on children who need him most, i.e. lgbt students who generally have no support system, who sometimes get picked on and beaten up for simply being as God made them, who can't come out to their parents for fear of being disowned and thrown out of their homes.

Walker was the one person whom they could have turned to for some support, but apparently he was too busy listening for the voice of God.

It's generally what happens when you are so busy trying to listen to the voice of God. You neglect the cries of His children.

Related posts:

Principal in MY state gets it right and wrong

Day Two of the Irmo GSA controversy finds that ignorance abounds
 

News from Irmo: School Board postpones decision regarding GSA

Grandstanding Principal Wants To Return



Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, July 06, 2010

'Top Ten Myths About Homosexuality' is a huge homophobic fraud

From time to time, religious right groups will publish "studies" or "resource guides" which they claim give the true picture of homosexuality. These guides are meant to be referred to by individuals who want  reasons to oppose lgbt progress, be it in schools or society in general.

A perfect example of one of these "research guides" is an interesting piece of work on webpage of the Family Research Council entitled The Top Ten Myths About Homosexuality.

According to its author Peter Sprigg:

The homosexual movement is built, not on facts or research, but on mythology. Unfortunately, these myths have come to be widely accepted in society—particularly in schools, universities and the media. It is our hope that by understanding what these key myths are—and then reading a brief summary of the evidence against them—the reader will be empowered to challenge these myths when he or she encounters them.

According to Sprigg, these "myths" include the following:

  • People are born gay.
  • Sexual orientation can never change.
  •  Homosexuals do not experience a higher level of psychological disorders than heterosexuals.
  • Homosexuals are no more likely to molest children than heterosexuals.

Sprigg isn't necessarily unbiased when it comes to the lgbt community. At one time he said that "homosexual behavior" should be declared illegal. Another time before that, he publicly said that lgbts should be exported out of the United States.

However, even excluding  Sprigg's dubious comments, there is enough problems with Ten Myths to question its credibility.

At first glance, Ten Myths looks legitimate. However, a more intensive look reveals it to be a mishmash of inaccurate theories, cherry-picked work, and studies taken out of context created to justify homophobia

The following are just a few of the problems with Ten Myths:

1. Ten Myths repeats the lie that the Robert Spitzer study proves that homosexuality is changeable, excluding the fact that Spitzer has said on more than one occasion that his research was being distorted.

2. Ten Myths utilizes the work of  the organization National Association for  Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH). The website Truth Wins Out calls NARTH  a discredited “ex-gay” fringe organization that peddles fraudulent “cures” for homosexuality.

According to Truth Wins Out, several NARTH members have been embroiled in controversies including:

Gerald Schoenwolf, PhD, a member of NARTH’ “Scientific Advisory Committee,” who wrote a piece on the group’s website that seemed to justify slavery

NARTH psychiatrist Joseph Berger, MD, another member of its “Scientific Advisory Committee,” who wrote a paper encouraging students to “ridicule” gender variant children.

Also, according to Truth Wins Out:

NARTH’ co-founder, Joesph Nicolosi encourages male clients to become more masculine by drinking Gatorade and referring to friends as “dude”. NARTH therapists have been known to practice rubber band therapy, where a gay client is made to wear a rubber band and snap it on his wrist when sexually stimulated. It is a mild form of aversion therapy meant to “snap” the client out of the moment of attraction. NARTH members have also been known to practice “touch therapy”, where a client sits in the therapist’ lap for up to an hour, while the therapist caresses him.

Earlier this year, another member of NARTH, George Rekers, resigned from the organization after caught coming from a vacation overseas with a "rentboy."

3. Ten Myths cites Ex-gays? A Longitudinal Study of Religiously Mediated Change in Sexual Orientation by Stanton L. Jones and Mark A Yarhouse as proof that people can change their sexual orientation. However in 2009, the American Psychological Association repudiated this study for bad methodology. Furthermore, Ten Myths does not address the conclusion by the APA last year that programs created to change a person's several orientation does not work.

4. Ten Myths pushes the inaccuracy that a man who molests a boy is automatically gay even though the American Psychological Association, the National Association of Social Workers, the American Academy of Child Psychiatrists and the Child Welfare League of America, all say that the homosexuality and pedophilia are not linked

5. But the most egregious inaccuracy in Ten Myths - and also something that says a lot about the mindset of its author, Peter Sprigg - is the following passage:

Even the pro-homosexual Gay & Lesbian Medical Association (GLMA) acknowledges:

• “Gay men use substances at a higher rate than the general population . . .”
• “Depression and anxiety appear to affect gay men at a higher rate . . . .”
• “ . . . [G]ay men have higher rates of alcohol dependence and abuse . . . .”
• “ . . . [G]ay men use tobacco at much higher rates than straight men . . . .”
• “Problems with body image are more common among gay men . . . and gay men are much more likely to experience an eating disorder . . . .”

The GLMA also confirms that:

• “ . . . [L]esbians may use tobacco and smoking products more often than heterosexual women use them.”
• “Alcohol use and abuse may be higher among lesbians.”
• “ . . . [L]esbians may use illicit drugs more often than heterosexual women.”

Homosexual activists generally attempt to explain these problems as results of “homophobic discrimination.” However, there is a serious problem with that theory—there is no empirical evidence that such psychological problems are greater in areas where disapproval of homosexuality is more intense.

So Sprigg's point is that the lgbt orientation itself is indicative of negative behaviors (i.e. drug and alcohol abuse) and not the homophobia that lgbts face.

But strange enough, the source which he cites - the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association - says that homophobia is the reason for many of these health problems. Sprigg deliberately omits information pointing this out:

Sprigg:

“Depression and anxiety appear to affect gay men at a higher rate . . . .”

GMLA:

Depression and anxiety appear to affect gay men at a higher rate than in the general population. The likelihood of depression or anxiety may be greater, and the problem may be more severe for those men who remain in the closet or who do not have adequate social supports. Adolescents and young adults may be at particularly high risk of suicide because of these concerns.

Sprigg:

“ . . . [L]esbians may use illicit drugs more often than heterosexual women.

GMLA:

Research indicates that lesbians may use illicit drugs more often than heterosexual women. This may be due to added stressors in lesbian lives from discrimination. Lesbians need support from each other and from health care providers to find healthy releases, quality recreation, stress reduction, and coping techniques. 

So basically The Top Ten Myths of Homosexuality is a fraud.  And the mythology that Sprigg spoke of has nothing to do with lgbts but with the mindset of anyone who takes his paper seriously and sees it for more than what it is - blatant homophobia wrapped up in phony science.


 


Bookmark and Share