 |
| Matt Barber |
Through the secular-”progressive” looking-glass, the term “sexual orientation” has, in a few short years, evolved to accommodate an ever-expanding fruit basket of carnal appetites.
Mr. Francis enjoys macramé, long walks on the beach, wearing lady’s knickers and showering fully nude with 6-year-old girls. Because it’s illegal to “discriminate based on the basis of gender identity,” and since it’s the only “tolerant” thing to do, this brave bellwether of the persecuted LGBT victim-class has secured the “civil right” for him and other men to fully expose themselves to your daughter in the locker room at Olympia, Washington’s Evergreen State College. But slow down, Dad.
According to the law, if you have a problem with Mr. Francis baring all to your baby girl, then you’re the problem. You’re a “transphobe” (“homophobia’s” evil twin sister, er, brother … whatever). Deck this sicko for terrifying your first-grader and you’re off to jail while “Colleen” is off to the “Human Rights Campaign” for a commendation as the latest victim of an “anti-LGBT hate crime.”
Rosa Parks in drag, I guess.
Only Matt Barber can be ridiculously offensive, downright crude, and just so wrong all at the same time.
A little tip - I would advise anyone set to whine about the so-called bad name that Christianity receives do one thing first. Hog tie Barber and lock him in a closet somewhere.
Even a sneeze from that guy destroys your argument.
3 comments:
Note too he seems to have no concern for the little boys! Imagine that!
Wait... where exactly is this locker room where adults shower with prepubescent children? Who are these parents who are totally okay with sending their child into a room full of nude adults who are total strangers, but freak out at the idea of one of those adults having diffetrent genitals?
If you actually read the story in question it was a 17 year old who complained, not a 6 year oldd as the bigots woulde have you believe. A woman just 12 months or less shy of being a legal adult who, let's be honest about American youth here, has probably already seen plenty of penises before this incident. If you walk into a locker room available to people in their 40s you're gonna see plenty of gross stuff even if your eye never wanders below the waist.
This whole story is just emotional BS piled ontop of emotional BS. I seriously doubt any children ever share the locker room with nude adults. I know I'd never let my 6 year old son into a lockerroom full of naked 40-something men regardless of their genitals. The 'child' who was so horrifically exposed to male genitalia was 12 months or less from being allowed to purchase hardcore pornography. Every story about this claims she 'expose' or 'displayed' her genitals because that sounds so much juicier than 'she was using the lockerroom for it's intended purpose'.
All of the articles about this story are so focused on demonizing her as a deviant exposing herself to poor teenage girls that none of them other to ask the question of why only a single complaint has been filed despite this person supposedly 'exposing' herself to everyone in sight including children?
Thank you for continuing 'Emilysvirtualrocket' in your blog. I do appreciate it greatly.
Sincerely,
Emily
Post a Comment