Over a week ago, Cameron was interviewed on Midweek Politics Radio regarding a "new study" which he claimed proves that allowing gays to serve openly in the military is a bad idea.
According to Cameron, gays are four to seven more times likely to rape their fellow servicemen. He even says that some perpetrators of heterosexual sex assaults can be termed as gay because apparently some gay men "like women too."
Now due to Cameron's dubious history of bad studies, no one has paid attention to his "new study" and it hasn't been cited, at least not by name.
Has it been surreptitiously referred to by the Family Research Council?
This came from a recent fundraising email by FRC head Tony Perkins:
As a veteran of the Marine Corps, I believe the President's timing on this issue shows he is willing to jeopardize our nation's security to advance the agenda of the radical homosexual lobby. We can't let that happen.
Our military exists to fight and win wars, not engage in radical social engineering. Forcing soldiers to cohabit with people who view them as sexual objects would inevitably lead to increased sexual tension, sexual harassment, and even sexual assault.
And just so you know, it was FRC who made put that second paragraph in bold letters. So now the organization is outwardly saying that allowing gays to serve openly in the military will lead to sexual assault over a week after Cameron claimed that he has a study proving this.
Coincidence? Maybe.
But knowing FRC's past history of citing Cameron's discredited work or bad theories, maybe not.
No comments:
Post a Comment