A few minutes ago, I had a say what moment.
A say what moment is when someone says something so unbelievable that it renders you silent for a few minutes with your mouth open in shock.
Who was the culprit of this say what moment? Why my and your favorite anti-gay spokesperson, Peter LaBarbera. In a piece he wrote about the recent Creating Change conference, LaBarbera complains about a speech by Rea Carey of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.
One of his points:
. . . thousands of left-wing, grassroots activists attend these annual “Creating Change” conferences; there is no parallel on the social Right for this scale of people and groups working closely together toward common goals. There are precious few organizing and political “how-to” conferences for pro-family conservatives. The Left eats and breathes politics; the Right is more distrustful of government, worse at politics, but more oriented toward God, family and church (the latter is obviously a good thing).
And thus, my say what moment.
Did LaBarbera actually say that there is no parallel on the social Right in terms of conferences and groups working together for their own agenda and the like?
Then what the hell were the Justice Sunday events in which religious right organizations whined about the courts?
Or Vision America, where pastors are "organized" to fight supposed "Godlessness,"
or those unbelievable Values Voters summits.
It's nice that LaBarbera seems to be fearful of lgbt power but his whining about organizations on his side of the so-cultural battle having no power is patently false, or to be less polite about it, a blatant lie.
At any rate, its a perfect segueway to what I wanted to write about today.
It always amazes me when I hear religious right spokespeople and organizations claim that lgbts are following some type of pragmatic plan to take over the country.
We should be so fortunate to be that organized.
I've come to the conclusion that whenever they accuse us of playing James Bond villian games, it's only to cover up just how skillful they plan and organize.
Follow me now:
The Supreme Court rules favorably for lgbts in a certain case.
One News Now, owned by the American Family Association, prints an article (biased, of course) against the ruling and quoting only so-called “pro-family” leaders such as Gary Bauer who claim that the ruling is a travesty on the country.
Other talking heads such as Michelle Malkin write columns falsely claiming that the Supreme Court ruled against them because of alleged biases of the justices. These columns are filtered
to other right-wing publications and blogs.
James Dobson (Focus on the Family) criticizes the ruling on his radio program, as does Tony Perkins (Family Research Council). Other articles are written trying to prove how the ruling will hurt America. More articles are written digging up speeches that the judges made, hinting on flimsy correlations between their ruling and so-called personal biases.
The blogs begin smear the reputations of the judges. Religious right code words (i.e. "activist judges") is repeated in columns, articles, and books.
The Traditional Values Coalition, the Family Research Council, and other so-called “pro-family” groups solicit donations making the claim that either the ruling will doom Christians and will lead to homosexuality being taught “as normal” to children or it will lead to criticizing homosexuality as being designated as a hate crime. They get people of faith who are gullible enough to believe their lies to write letters to their local newspapers (using a script of anti-gay industry talking points.)
Backdoor meetings are held and suddenly, Congressmen friendly to religious right causes begin to cite religious right talking points in speeches and on the floor of Congress.
So-called news programs (Fox News) begin debating whether or not judges have a bias against people of faith.
Talk show hosts such as Mike Huckabee have religious right spokespeople as the sole guests on their shows where they spew talking points unchallenged.
Events such as Justice Sunday fill the airwaves, scaring people of faith about a supposed plot to take away their liberties and their ability to worship.
And then they really begin to organize.
That, ladies and gentlemen, is how planning and organizing is done. And folks like Peter have cornered the market on it.
1 comment:
i think there needs to be more study on countertransference as a means of understanding how these people act.
'In psychoanalytic theory, counter-transference occurs when the therapist begins to project his or her own unresolved conflicts onto the client.'
the old adage about those who scream the loudest about something have the most to hide i believe to be in play with these people; they hide behind orthodoxy but we see release of things they consider sordid coming from their psyches when they get caught doing the very things they condemn...
Post a Comment