Thursday, July 19, 2012

Chick-Fil-A exposes NOM's phony call for company neutrality

Maggie Gallagher of NOM
With the news of Chick-Fil-A's stance against marriage equality, some of us were waiting for the National Organization for Marriage to show its hypocrisy.

You may remember that a while back, NOM was demanding that companies in Minnesota adopt a neutral stance on the amendment the state will be voting on in regards to gay marriage. It sent the following letter to 50 Minnesota companies:

As a cultural matter that has little to do with your corporate mission to serve customers, earn profits, and provide good jobs for the people of Minnesota we would request that _____ adopt a neutral stance on the Minnesota marriage amendment. We do not request that you endorse our efforts to protect the age-old definition of what is a marriage, but only that you stay neutral and respect the conscience rights of your customers and employees who are on both sides of the issue.[...]
Wading into a culture war over an issue where _____ has no business interest is to invite public backlash, much like what Starbucks is experiencing in the DumpStarbucks.com campaign, with little upside. Polls have put support for the Minnesota marriage amendment at 56% – higher than polls in North Carolina had support for the marriage amendment there just prior to the 61-39% victory for marriage in that state.[...]
We are carefully watching what _____ will do on this important measure, with the expectation that you will not be engaged on one side or the other. Please let us know if this is not the case.

Naturally, NOM has taken a different tone with Chick-Fil-A's stance, calling the company's president, Dan Cathy, "a corporate hero for marriage" on its blog.

This two-faced hypocrisy reeks of something former NOM president Maggie Gallagher would think of. She does have a habit of speaking out of both sides of her mouth such as praising same-sex families on one side while condemning them on the other while at the same time attempting to fool people into thinking that she is not being two-faced.

People are not stupid, NOM.


Bookmark and Share

2 comments:

JT1962 said...

While most people aren't stupid, most followers of NOM agree with their every move, no questions asked. You can't say something bad about Brian or Maggie without them telling you how evil you are for even suggesting it. Since I'm not allowed to post on their site nor their Facebook page, I have no way to express my contempt for them easily. I just know that we can't follow their same tactics. We have to be better than they are. Because we ARE better than they are.

Penny Marie Sautereau said...

Oh yes, raised stock, lots of positive free press, increased sales and business, Starbucks is suffering SOOOOOO horribly.