Thursday, April 08, 2021

Repost - Sterilization, irreversible surgeries and chemical castrations - How religious right lies corrupts the conversation about trans children

Editor's note - Probably a first for this blog. I am going to re-run a post I published on Wednesday. The post, Sterilization, irreversible surgeries and chemical castrations - How religious right lies corrupts the conversation about trans children, is probably one of the most important pieces I've written in a long time. The religious right have declared war on our transgender children by pushing bills across the nation targeting them and particularly the affirming healthcare they need. And as usual when the religious right declares war on our community, they knowingly tell lies. But there is something exceedingly awful about this time. They know that their lies are specifically hurting transgender children but they simply do NOT care. This is easily the worst thing groups like the Family Research Council and the Alliance Defending Freedom has ever done.  To undermine LGBTQ rights and health is one thing. But to deliberately harm children is simply vile. 

This post will run all weekend. Please read and share if you can.



This week,  Arkansas governor Asa Hutchinson vetoed the bill which would outlaw transgender healthcare for minors. And then by a simple majority, the state legislature overrode the veto, making Arkansas the first state to outlaw affirming healthcare for transgender children.

The Family Research Council sent out a press release celebrating what the Arkansas legislature did:

Today, Arkansas became the first state in the nation to enact legislation that prohibits gender transition procedures on minors, prevents taxpayer funds or medical insurance mandates to pay for them, and provides legal remedies for minors who have been permanently disfigured and/or sterilized by them.

 On Tuesday afternoon, in quick succession the Arkansas House (72-25) and Senate (25-8) overrode the governor's veto of the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act. Family Research Council praised the state legislature for its effort to protect minors. 

 Family Research Council President Tony Perkins released the following statement: "The SAFE Act's successful passage into law is a victory for children and their health and safety. The state of Arkansas has taken the lead in the race to protect children from a political movement that advocates for using off-label drugs and experimental procedures on minors. 

 "As the name implies, the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act protects minors from unscientific, experimental, and destructive gender transition procedures that interrupt their natural development and irreversibly alter their bodies. As a growing number of individuals come forward to share their stories of being permanently disfigured and/or sterilized, there is a growing and urgent need for other states to follow Arkansas' lead by protecting minors from life-altering procedures such as puberty-blocking drugs, cross-sex hormones, and irreversible surgeries. 

The  consistent repetition  of phrases like "life altering procedures" and "irreversible surgeries" and words like "disfigurement" and "sterilization" in FRC's press release isn't happenstance. It has been part of a deliberate attempt to "nauseate" instead of "educate" and exploit unfounded fears for a cynical purpose. By conjuring up false images of minors being forced to undergo surgeries altering their gender and given drugs which would permanently damage their health, those who have been pushing these anti-trans bills - like FRC - have been deliberately appealing to hysteria in a somewhat successful attempt to drown out the voices of the medical professionals who know better and the transgender youth who they falsely claim that they want to protect.

It's an old but highly successful tactic. 

In the past,  religious right groups claimed that marriage equality would "corrupt the innocence" of children.  Or that any pro-LGBTQ legislation would be make it easier for gays to "recruit children" because apparently we need to "refreshen our ranks." They know what they say are lies but they don't care as long as it gives them attention and an advantage, no matter how insane the claims sound.

For example, this is what FRC said in another press release defending Fox News personality Tucker Carlson's lie about transgender healthcare when Governor Hutchinson defended his veto on Carlson's show:

The governor also said he would have supported the bill if it was simply limited to banning castration. But as Carlson pointed out, "This is chemical castration... If you stop puberty and suppress the sex hormones, you're chemically castrating someone." And he wasn't wrong: Like many other "gender clinics" for children, the Arkansas Children's Hospital web site acknowledges on page 2 of this "FAQ for Youth" that puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones are "irreversible."

In attempting to defend Carlson, FRC told a huge lie. The link the organization cited does not say that puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones are "irreversible." The following is the quote FRC distorts:

What is transition and how do I know if it’s right for me?  - social transition is changing your outward appearance (hairstyle, clothing, gender expression) along with your name and pronouns. It is completely reversible. ~medical transition alters physical and sexual characteristics of the body. This can include hormone therapy and surgery, and is not reversible. Medical transition can only happen if your parents/guardians and doctors agree this is right for you.

And guess what? The chemical castration claim is also a lie. It is yet another way of bombarding people with horror stories which appeal to their fears instead of their intelligence. In truth, the following facts about healthcare as it relates to trans youth are so easy to find.  And - further surprise - it has nothing to do with "irreversible surgeries" or castrations:

Reuters - As reported by the Thomson Reuters Foundation in Feb. 2020, a global rise in the number of teenagers seeking to go through gender reassignment has spurred a series of court cases around the age at which young people are able to choose to transition – and who has the final word. Gender reassignment surgery is widely restricted to adults over the age of 18 (here)
The World Professional Association for Transgender Health’s (WPATH) standards of care here , explain the three categories of physical interventions for adolescents. These consist of fully reversible interventions such as hormone suppression to delay puberty, partially reversible interventions such as hormone therapy, and irreversible interventions such as surgical procedures. The association advises that “moving from one stage to another should not occur until there has been adequate time for adolescents and their parents to assimilate fully the effects of earlier interventions.”

 Genital surgery should not happen until the individual reaches the age of majority to give consent in a given country and have lived continuously for at least 12 months in their gender identity, according to the association. Puberty-suppressing medications are reversible, as explained in a 2016 report by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, American College of Osteopathic Pediatricians and the American Academy of Pediatrics here . The report categorizes hormone therapy and gender-affirming surgeries for “older adolescents” and “adults”, not children.

Mayo Clinic - Use of GnRH analogues doesn't cause permanent changes in an adolescent's body. Instead, it pauses puberty, providing time to determine if a child's gender identity is long lasting. It also gives children and their families time to think about or plan for the psychological, medical, developmental, social and legal issues ahead. If an adolescent child stops taking GnRH analogues, puberty will resume. 

When it comes to trans youth, it's not about surgeries or drugs. It's about affirming and supporting who they are. It's about accepting them for who they are and leading them safely down the path to who they are meant to be.

Seriously, this entire attack on transgender children and their healthcare was totally unnecessary if wanting to protect children was the goal.  There was no need for legislation or talking points if wanting to protect children was the goal. There was no need for lies and horror stories if wanting to protect children was the goal. There is enough experts out there and enough information for anyone who truly cared about trans children.

But here is the problem. Those pushing these bills blocking affirming healthcare for trans youth simply don't care. They claim that they want to protect children but to some of them, it's all about their own definition of a world in which children fit their narrow construct.  To others, it's another notch in their belt for the 'culture war.'

To both parties, transgender children are simply collateral damage.



'NC bill would force school staffers to out trans kids' & other Thur midday news briefs

 


North Carolina Bill Would Force School Staffers to Out Trans Kids - What is with these folks


Sterilization, irreversible surgeries and chemical castrations - How religious right lies corrupts the conversation about trans children - My post from last night. I really wish this was a topic of many conversations. Not my post, but the subject of my post. 

‘Pose’ Final Season Trailer Promises Tears, Triumph And Billy Porter - Maybe it will get that Emmy for 'Outstanding Drama Series.'

Wednesday, April 07, 2021

Sterilization, irreversible surgeries and chemical castrations - How religious right lies corrupts the conversation about trans children



This week,  Arkansas governor Asa Hutchinson vetoed the bill which would outlaw transgender healthcare for minors. And then by a simple majority, the state legislature overrode the veto, making Arkansas the first state to outlaw affirming healthcare for transgender children.

The Family Research Council sent out a press release celebrating what the Arkansas legislature did:

Today, Arkansas became the first state in the nation to enact legislation that prohibits gender transition procedures on minors, prevents taxpayer funds or medical insurance mandates to pay for them, and provides legal remedies for minors who have been permanently disfigured and/or sterilized by them.

 On Tuesday afternoon, in quick succession the Arkansas House (72-25) and Senate (25-8) overrode the governor's veto of the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act. Family Research Council praised the state legislature for its effort to protect minors. 

 Family Research Council President Tony Perkins released the following statement: "The SAFE Act's successful passage into law is a victory for children and their health and safety. The state of Arkansas has taken the lead in the race to protect children from a political movement that advocates for using off-label drugs and experimental procedures on minors. 

 "As the name implies, the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act protects minors from unscientific, experimental, and destructive gender transition procedures that interrupt their natural development and irreversibly alter their bodies. As a growing number of individuals come forward to share their stories of being permanently disfigured and/or sterilized, there is a growing and urgent need for other states to follow Arkansas' lead by protecting minors from life-altering procedures such as puberty-blocking drugs, cross-sex hormones, and irreversible surgeries. 

The  consistent repetition  of phrases like "life altering procedures" and "irreversible surgeries" and words like "disfigurement" and "sterilization" in FRC's press release isn't happenstance. It has been part of a deliberate attempt to "nauseate" instead of "educate" and exploit unfounded fears for a cynical purpose. By conjuring up false images of minors being forced to undergo surgeries altering their gender and given drugs which would permanently damage their health, those who have been pushing these anti-trans bills - like FRC - have been deliberately appealing to hysteria in a somewhat successful attempt to drown out the voices of the medical professionals who know better and the transgender youth who they falsely claim that they want to protect.

It's an old but highly successful tactic. 

'Middle-grade trans novel most challenged book for third consecutive year ' & other Wed midday news briefs




Middle-Grade Trans Novel Most Challenged Book for Third Year in a Row - For Pete's sake, folks.

Putin formally bans same-sex marriages in Russia - Don't you wish someone would ban Putin.

Senate OKs bill allowing opt-out of LGBT curriculum - Cause if children learn that LGBTQ people exist, they may want to become one . . . or something like that. . .

Tuesday, April 06, 2021

Former Congressional candidate launches into profanity-filled transphobic tirade after Dr. Phil taping

Angela Stanton-King 

Former Congressional candidate and Trump supporter Angela Stanton-King recently taped an episode of Dr. Phil and apparently it got ugly. Whatever happened led her to storm out of the taping and film the following vulgar, profanity-filled, transphobic tirade attacking Dr. Phil, his wife, and several other people.  Rumor control says that it had something do with her alleged transgender child.

 


Some - very few - have taken her side while attempting to portray her as a mother defending her child. However, based upon King's history of targeting LGBTQ people (such as labeling us as pedophiles which led to a blow-up between her and me last year), I doubt that she was defending her child.

If anything, her language makes another point about how dangerous it is for transgender children to thrive in a climate in which so many are willing to spout basic ignorance about transgender people in general  while targeting them with ugly legislation

Ms. King talks about common sense, but she obviously lacks it. Pick up a book, consult a medical expert when it comes to transgender people, especially transgender children. It's not difficult. Stop clinging to such rudimentary nonsense about body parts and such. There is so much accurate information out there.

Her tirade is humorous in its immaturity, but don't let the comical aspect of it blind you to the reality of how many people would rather immerse themselves in sad stupidity instead of getting facts about transgender people. 


Related posts:

'NY legislator resigns after ugly remark about putting gays on an island' & other Tue midday news briefs



NY Legislator Resigns After Furor Over Remarks About Gay People - The "put gays on an island and they will be gone in 40 years" guy resigned. I guess he will claim to be a "victim of cancel culture." 

Lil Nas X's 'Song About Gay Sex' Hits #1 on Billboard Hot 100 - Ben Shapiro is going to lose his mind.

Monday, April 05, 2021

Video - Randy Rainbow wrecks Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham over their 'sudden' concern about our border

To paraphrase a comment under this video, just because Trump is no longer in office doesn't mean Randy Rainbow has no more material to use. Thanks the GOP members of Congress, that is. In this particular video, Randy brutally calls out Senators Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham for their sudden concern about the situation at the border.  

Deliciously and unapologetically brutal, particularly to Graham.

'Anti-LGBTQ activists now funding voter suppression & anti-vaccine conspiracies' & other Mon midday news briefs

 

The Liberty Counsel's Mat Staver

Anti-LGBTQ activists are now funding voter suppression & anti-vaccine conspiracies - Grifters gotta grift. Not surprising at all. 

Former NFL coach on why she opposes Idaho law targeting transgender athletes - Katie Sowers, the first woman to coach a Superbowl game, has something to say about these awful bills and laws targeting transgender athletes. 


Sunday, April 04, 2021

Donnie McClurkin's struggles with his sexual orientation should earn no sympathy

Gospel singer Donnie McClurkin


Supposed ex-gay gospel singer Donnie McClurkin is in the news again.  He said that his personal struggles against homosexuality will lead him to be alone for the rest of his life.

 McClurkin, 61, had previously opened up years ago about his past struggles with homosexuality, which he called a “perversion,” and claimed that he was able to suppress his sexual orientation, citing his and many Christian churches’ stance on homosexuality as a sin. He admitted that he still had urges to be with men but chose not to. Comparing homosexuality to diabetes he said, “I don’t eat sugar, but it doesn’t mean that I don’t want sugar.”  

 . . . .“I didn’t know really what a woman wanted,” McClurkin said on Uncensored. “I’ve messed up more than I’ve had good. My past relationships were a sprinkling of everything – men and women.”

 “When things get rough I go back into my safe place – my music and my ministry,” he added. “Never having a long-term relationship in my life and never being married, I chalked that up. I will probably be alone for the rest of my life as far as a mate is concerned.”

I've never been a fan of his "testimony" about his so-called deliverance from homosexuality. But this new angle, this public mourning he is engaging in about his life has gotten me more perturbed at him.

McClurkin is a grown man. His sexual orientation is not a choice, but how he chooses to express it is a choice. He is alone because he chooses to be. And that is his personal decision, which I have no problem with.

What bothers me is how McClurkin has been vocal over the years about how homosexuality is a sin and how he is trying to help LGBTQ children and adults by supposedly steering them away it. He has made statements attesting this on television shows and in the pulpits. He sounded so sure of himself, so determined to "protect the children."

Now here he comes with this sob story about how he is having trouble with relationships and how he will probably be alone for the rest of his life.

That's a terrible message he is sending to LGBTQ people, particularly black LGBTQ youth -  Homosexuality is a sin. God doesn't you to be an LGBTQ person. And you should fight it even if it means you  are sentencing yourself to a lonely life.

To me, it all comes down to the fact that perhaps McClurkin should have settled his own life situation before he took it upon himself to be a crusader in other people's lives.  He's not that much of a credible messenger if his message embraces loneliness.  I feel very little sympathy for him, but my heart goes out to those who bought into his negative message about their God-given LGBTQ sexual orientation. His revelation of being a flawed messenger has to be devastating. Where do they turn now? Do they embrace the idea that homosexuality is a sin, but fighting against it will lead to a lonely life?

Do they question God's love and credibility if they accept McClurkin's message? Would a loving God lead them to have a life with no one to love? Or will they just say to hell with it all and just embrace melancholy in the face of choice McClurkin has presented to them? 

McClurkin seems to have forgotten the first rule of declaring yourself a leader and a public face of a movement - you don't have a personal life. Everything is public and the feelings you express are transcribed by those who follow you as directions of where they should go.

And with that in mind, McClurkin is sending his followers into a deep hole of despair.

Personally, I think McClurkin should find himself a good man with some good dick and have a good life. At the very least, he should take into account the messages he sends before the next time he opens his mouth.

Thursday, April 01, 2021

27 celebrities to remind you that religious right claims about the 'gay lifespan' is yet another lie

Readers of this blog know that one anti-gay myth I have combatted on many times is the idea that gay men generally have shorter life spans than heterosexual men. In the past, it was a popular and much repeated notion by religious right groups and personalities that "homosexuality takes years off of your life."  The ages in which we supposedly died varied, but it always before we were 50. This notion became less popular when folks like myself revealed that the notion sprung from junk science and cherry-picked studies. 

Still, you know how the religious right is. They never let go of what they consider a good homophobic lie. Outright claims about "shortened gay lives" have given way to vague inferences that it is impossible to have a long and fruitful life if you are a gay man.

The video above should be a reminder that such claim, like so many other claims of the religious right, is a big fat lie.

'Proposed law would make businesses post signs saying they allow trans people to use the bathroom' & other Thur midday news briefs



Proposed law would make businesses post signs saying they allow trans people to use the bathroom - I'm undecided about this.

North Carolina Democrats call for state to pass LGBTQ package - It would be interesting if this became a reality. 



Wednesday, March 31, 2021

YouTube allowing discredited anti-trans author and Prager U to fundraise off encouraging parents to reject their transgender children

Discredited author Abigail Shrier continues to declare war on transgender children

According to Media Matters, YouTube is doing the transgender community a huge disservice by allowing groups and individuals to fundraise on the message that parents should reject their transgender children. And in doing so, YouTube is ignoring its own community guidelines:

YouTube is helping right-wing propaganda network PragerU to fundraise off of a March 29 video titled “Why Girls Become Boys,” which spreads disinformation about trans youth and health care -- despite YouTube’s Community Guidelines that include protections for trans people. 

The video features anti-trans author Abigail Shrier suggesting that young trans people are not actually trans and that parents should reject their trans kids’ gender identities. Shrier is a major player in the crusade against the rights of trans youth and wrote a book misinforming about trans youth called Irreversible Damage. She also recently testified before the Senate against the Equality Act and has made multiple appearances on Fox News to lie about trans people. 

 The new video with Shrier uses the YouTube Giving program and has earned more than 285,000 views in one day and -- alongside other videos in PragerU’s fundraising campaign on the platform -- has raised more than $51,000. The YouTube Giving Program’s rules say that nonprofits must follow the platform’s Community Guidelines, which supposedly protect trans people. In fact, YouTube has previously removed videos from PragerU and other channels that spread harmful disinformation about trans people, including suggestions that they have a mental illness. 

Shrier, whose book was called out for several distortions (including presenting false anti-trans statistics) has absolutely no expertise in transgender healthcare.

'LGBTQ students file class-action lawsuit against Department of Education' & other Wed midday news briefs.

 


LGBTQ students file class-action lawsuit against Department of Education - Well alright! Sock it to them! Sorry but no taxpayer funding for religious schools who discriminate against LGBTQ people.

Biden administration scraps Trump's anti-LGBTQ agenda abroad - Hell yeah I'm happy I voted for Joe Biden. 


Tuesday, March 30, 2021

Unverified horror stories about trans youth helping to pass anti-transgender legislation



In 1981, a now discredited homophobic researcher by the name of Paul Cameron made up a story about a child being dragged into a bathroom, raped and then mutilated by gay man.  He told this story while speaking against a pro-gay ordinance in Omaha, NB. Police investigated but couldn't find any assault. But Cameron repeated the story and subsequently, the ordinance was defeated by a large margin.

Fast forward to 2021 in Arkansas where the state legislature just passed a bill preventing trans children from receiving affirming healthcare. The state did this based upon the lie that transgender children are receiving gender-transitioning surgeries and taking dangerous hormones. 

In bragging about this, anti-LGBTQ hate group the Family Research Council sent out the following tweet detailing how a legislator told the story of a trans boy allegedly receiving a double mastectomy and then regretting it:




You'll notice that FRC did not include any details nor did the legislator in question, Alan Clark. Though if you read Clark's twitter feed, you would see that he is a fan of sending out paranoid tweets about President Biden's son Hunter, conspiracies about COVID, and arguments claiming that global warming isn't real.

In other words, a basic far-right smorgabord of hysteria and paranoia. Of course though FRC has never been one for caring about the veracity of its sources or said sources' claims if the group can exploit them both.

And this particular story is a doozy. I had to google but I think I found what FRC and Clark was alluding to - an article called Double Mastectomy at 15, Detrans 16-Year-Old Now Seeks Reversal

It's the alleged story of a 16-year-old transgender boy, Penny Cunningham, who is detransitioning. Penny supposedly got a double mastectomy in Pennsylvania at 15 and was seeking funds via gofundme for a breast reconstruction. The article was published on July 10, 2020 in an online publication called The Velvet Chronicle

The Velvet Chronicle seems to have a very serious problem with the transgender community.  It pushes the idea that transgender youth are actually  "nonconforming youth" bullied into being labeled as transgender. It also embraces the strange notion that lesbian voices are being replaced, particularly by transgender voices. In its attempts to prove  these beliefs, the publication freely throws out phrases like "gay eugenics," "gender vultures,"  or "medicalized gay conversion therapy."  In other words, the same type who likes to use phrases like "women's space" as if  disguising their prejudices in intellectually esoteric terms makes them more palpable.  A polite way to refer to  The Velvet Chronicle would be to call it a "maddening mess of unbridled and ignorant TERFdom," but that's another matter entirely.

In this particularly case, the story of this alleged detransitioner should raise a lot of eyebrows. I broke down several problems with it.


1. From Penny's claim, the medical professionals in question may have acted illegally  or unethically but Penny doesn't give any information to further an investigation. 

2. Penny is incredibly vague about everything in the story. There is no way anyone can verify if Penny is who he or she says they are or what hospital the alleged mastectomy took place

3. Where there are gaps in Penny's story, The Velvet Chronicle fills in with quite a bit anti-transgender propaganda.

4. Except for a few tweets and links on far-right or anti-transgender webpage (all echoing the article from The Velvet Chronicle and linking  Penny's now defunct gofundme page), there is no more information about Penny. As far as I have seen, there is no knowledge of whether or not Penny was successful with the fundraising or what they are doing in the present. The Velvet Chronicle did no follow-up.

Of course what I found thus far is not meant to be disrespectful.  The truth may be in fact that Penny does exist and that the story told is accurate, including the claim about the mastectomy. But as of now, it doesn't look that way.

It looks as if the religious right hasn't veered from fear tactics about LGBTQ people. What worked in 1982 seems to be working in 2021. And this time, they got help from folks within our community. And that is really scary.

Related posts:

'

'Lil Nas X's trolling of religious right makes his shoes a huge seller' & other Tue midday news briefs

Lil Nas X

For years, the religious right used outrage against us to fundraise and sell their message. Turnabout, as they say . . . 

Monday, March 29, 2021

SD anti-trans athlete bill dies in embarrassing heap in front of Governor Noem

South Dakota Governor Krist Noem veoted an anti-trans bill she supported.


South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem went from eager to sign her state's anti-transgender athletes bill to reluctantly vetoing it, even though she refused to call what she did a veto. It was this turn which mostly likely stopped the bill's momentum as it died after the state legislature failed to override her veto.

From Outsports:

 The flaming runaway train that has been South Dakota Republicans’ effort to enact a ban on transgender student-athletes finally flew off the tracks today. 

 Changes proposed by Republican Gov. Kirsti Noem to HB1217, aka the Act to Promote Continued Fairness in Women’s Sports, were soundly defeated Monday by the Republican-controlled State House of Representatives, on what is colloquially known as “Veto Day.” The Grand Forks Herald reported the final tally was 67-2, with all but two Democrats crossing party lines to stand with the Republicans against the embattled governor. The bill is now dead. 

 One week ago today, Noem put all her eggs into the basket she called “Defend Title IX Now.” The governor who has been absolutely hammered by conservatives for refusing to sign HB1217, described it as a “coalition of legislators, leaders and athletes,” who will apply pressure in a “fill the jails”-style action to force the NCAA into a corner. The association would be forced to sue or sanction a number of schools nationwide, in order to uphold its trans-affirming policies in those states. “Once we have a coalition big enough to where the NCAA cannot possibly punish us all, then we can guarantee fairness at the collegiate level,” she said. 

 Nah, said the State House of Representatives.

According to the article, Noem said she stopped supporting the bill to prevent what she was a coming lawsuit from the NCAA, which of course should send a message to other states who either passed or looking to pass anti-trans athletes bills.

Unfortunately I doubt it will change their minds. And neither will Noem's next move.

 Outsports said that she is expected to call a special session of the legislature to push a new anti-trans bill. In reality, the session would be less about passing a bill and more about picking up the pieces of her reputation amongst right-wing conservatives.  They are extremely angry at how they think she botched up an easy win against the LGBTQ community.

Even if she is successful, one wonders just how much her support from religious conservatives has been damaged.

UPDATE - This just in from the ACLU. I guess Govenor Noem didn't want to wait:


'Four myths about trans athletes debunked' & other Mon midday news briefs

  


Four Myths About Trans Athletes, Debunked - What bothers me about this list is how folks who have the power to tell the real story - ie our mainstream media - failed and continue to fail the trans community. These are facts which should have been introduced a long time ago. 


Lil Nas X Claps Back at Conservatives Calling 'Montero' 'Evil' - Lil Nas X is having the time of his life trolling conservatives. 

Sunday, March 28, 2021

Revisiting 'The Ambiguously Gay Duo' - funny, offensive, or just plain corny?

Editor's note - a frivolous and funny post every now and then never hurts.

A long time ago - to be accurate, in 1996 - when the LGBTQ community was on the cusp of the visibility we have now, Saturday Night Live would run  funny cartoon shorts. Probably the most popular was The Ambiguously Gay Duo.

From Wikipedia:

The Ambiguously Gay Duo is a parody of the stereotypical comic book superhero duo done in the style of Saturday morning cartoons like Super Friends. The characters are clad in matching pastel turquoise tights, dark blue domino masks, and bright yellow coordinated gauntlets, boots and shorts. The shorts were intended to satirize suggestions that early Batman comics implied a homosexual relationship between the eponymous title character and his field partner and protégé Robin, a charge most infamously leveled by Fredric Wertham in his 1954 book, Seduction of the Innocent, the research methodology for which was later discredited. 

The typical episode usually begins with the duo's arch-nemesis Bighead, a criminal mastermind with an abnormally large cranium. Bighead is usually briefing his henchmen on a plot for some grandiose plan for world domination, interrupted by a debate as to whether or not Ace and Gary (The Ambiguously Gay Duo) are gay. Once the crime is in process, the police commissioner calls on the superheroes to save the day, often engaging in similar debates with the chief of police. Ace and Gary set out to foil the evil plan, but not before calling attention to themselves with outrageous antics and innuendo, and behaving in ways perceived by other characters to be stereotypically homosexual . . . 

I found the segments funny at the time they premiered. I still find them a bit hilarious, but less than I originally did. They are interesting to view for the sake of history. But now they strike me as a bit more corny.

I'm curious as to what you think. Please let me know in the comments section below.

Friday, March 26, 2021

The Family Research Council is obviously trying to 'bust hell wide open'

 Accusing someone of "busting hell wide open" is an action calling out a supposed religious person or group for a breathtakingly show of hypocrisy.

With that in mind, check out a Friday tweet from the Family Research Council:


Gender dysphoria is the scientific name which describes conditions of the transgender community. So basically FRC is saying that the transgender community should be treated with sympathy and compassion. This is the same Family Research Council whose president, Tony Perkins,  has targeted the transgender community with dehumanizing rhetoric and false accusations, worked with former VP Mike Pence to get them banned from serving in the military, and worst of all, portrayed transgender children as predators:




My suggestion would be for FRC to first follow its own advice. And stop thinking the rest of us are so stupid to take its tweet about "compassion" seriously.

Or at the very least, don't bother sending a postcard when y'all and Tony do in fact bust hell wide open. 


'Tenn bill seeks to ban LGBTQ content from school textbooks' & other Fri midday news briefs

 




Youth activists lead the fight against anti-trans bills - And they're right, too. They are being ignored.


New U.K. Currency Honors Alan Turing, Pioneering Computer Scientist And Code-Breaker - About time, too. There is no such thing as too many honors for Alan Turing.

Thursday, March 25, 2021

Transphobic former HHS official's claims about Dr. Rachel Levine simply aren't credible


Former HHS official Roger Severino (top photo) makes alleged claims about new and openly transgender  HHS official Rachel Levine (bottom photo). But the claims cannot be verified as truth, particularly when one remembers that during his tenure, Severino made several attempts to undermine transgender health via policy changes. Severino even misled the public to create a 'conscience rule.' The 'conscience rule' was then struck down by three court rulings.


As I said Wednesday, even though Dr. Rachel Levine was successfully confirmed as the Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services, conservatives and the religious right will do their utmost to undermine her.

From the Family Research Council:


 The Biden administration made history Wednesday, but not the kind that most Americans will celebrate. In a tight, near party-line vote, the Senate confirmed the president's transgender pick for deputy secretary of HHS, Rachel Levine -- whose idea of "health care" is sterilizing and mutilating young children.


Implied by Sen. Rand Paul during her hearing that Dr. Levine supports sex change surgeries for children, this claim has been proven as a lie. What's sadder is that FRC provided links in an attempt to prove the claim's accuracy and the links boiled down to a conference booklet which proved absolutely nothing.

It gets more hilarious. 

Supposedly FRC interviewed an eyewitness who claimed that Dr. Levine does advocate sex change surgeries for children. And who is that witness? Former HHS official Roger Severino.

For those who have not kept up with HHS drama and therefore are wondering why is Severino attempting to channel Alexis Colby on Dynasty during Blake Carrington's murder trial at the end of the first season, allow me to explain.

In 2017, Severino was appointed by former president Donald Trump as Director of the Office for Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Many in the LGBTQ community protested because he came from anti-LGBTQ right-wing groups. and we felt that his goal was to undermine our rights and health.

And that he did. Or at the very least, he tried:


 LGBTQ equality groups and several allies raised the alarm when he was picked due to his history of working against LGBTQ equality. And while at HHS, Severino did nothing to assuage their fears.  In 2018, The Advocate claimed that he was attempting to "erase trans people out of existence" by pushing a memo which would say that gender identity doesn't exist and that gender is set at birth and defined by genitalia. 

Severino was also responsible for an attempt to create a rule which would roll back protections for the trans community against discrimination through Obamacare, and  a "conscience rule" which said any healthcare worker could deny services to LGBTQ people based on "moral or religious" reasons. In November 2019, three different federal courts struck down the rule and one court found that HHS exaggerated a justification for the rule. Severino was pointed out in an NPR article to have contributed to that exaggeration. 


This is what Severino had to say to FRC about Dr. Levine:


During Roger's time at the agency where Levine is now second-in-command, he met the new deputy. Back then, he explains, Levine wasn't so coy about what he believed about young people. When the HHS team asked about minors and transgender treatment, "I heard it directly," Severino explained, "and the answer was: 'Yes, yes, minors should be given cross-sex hormones and surgery when they have gender dysphoria'..."

He even had the audacity to make this claim:

"The activism runs deep," he warns. "It was evasive to the point of being disingenuous, not to answer Senator Paul when asked directly when I knew what the answer was, because I've heard it when the shoe was on the other foot and those doctors wanted to keep the Obama transgender mandate in place. This is scary times when we're going to see this push, especially when it comes to minor children, 12 to 18, to have radical surgeries that will sterilize them. And you cannot turn back. And I'm afraid that's where HHS may be going if Levine gets confirmed."

There is no other way of putting this. Roger Severino is full of shit. Why should anyone believe this man? His entire tenure at HHS comprised of thinking of new ways to undermine LGBTQ,  particularly transgender health. He's also the same man who was caught lying in pursuit of changing HHS policy to endanger LGBTQ health.

The only thing we should take from this nonsense with FRC and Severino is the satisfaction of karma in seeing that Health and Human Services went from housing an undercover bigot like  Severino to being led in part by openly transgender Dr. Rachel Levine. 

That realization, my friends, is sweet.

'Hair care company Pantene refuses to back down after backlash to ad featuring LGBTQ family' & other Thur midday news briefs

 

Pantene continues to support trans youth and LGBTQ families in spite of the backlash for this ad.

Pantene doubles down on support for transgender youth after backlash to ad featuring LGBTQ family - Way to go, Pantene.

Chechen Crackdown Continues With Persecution of Gay Men's Families - For crying out loud! Persecution continues in Chechnya. 


Wednesday, March 24, 2021

Dr. Rachel Levine makes history, becomes first openly transgender person confirmed by Senate

Just a few moments ago, Dr. Rachel Levine made history. 

By a vote of 52-48, Levine was confirmed as assistant secretary of Health and Human Services. She is the first openly transgender person to be confirmed by the Senate. She even had two Republican senators, Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski,  join Democrats in voting for her.

Levine survived a brutal confirmation process which saw conservatives practically gang up to sink her nomination, including spreading vicious memes  and lies about her on Twitter and Facebook, disrespecting her during the confirmation hearing, and finally conjuring up some nonsense about her mother in a nursing home. This played heavily in the right-wing media, but rightfully got ignored in the mainstream press.

They even falsely claimed that she advocated sex change surgeries for children.

But none of it worked as Levine sailed through.

The road is not going to be easy for Dr. Levine because conservatives and the religious right are angry at her confirmation. And she will continue to be the subject of  many ugly lies and comments. But like the old saying goes, "no struggle, no progress."  Her confirmation is a victory for the transgender community, not to mention the concepts of fairness and equality. 

From The Associated Press:

Levine had been serving as Pennsylvania’s top health official since 2017, and emerged as the public face of the state’s response to the coronavirus pandemic. She is expected to oversee Health and Human Services offices and programs across the U.S. President Joe Biden cited Levine’s experience when he nominated her in January. Levine “will bring the steady leadership and essential expertise we need to get people through this pandemic — no matter their zip code, race, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability,” Biden said.


Related posts:

Rand Paul made a fool of himself when questioning Dr. Rachel Levine. The Family Research Council tries to repair the embarrassment.  

 Rand Paul's attack on HHS nominee Rachel Levine exposes how the religious right needs anti-LGBTQ junk science

'Poll says 75 percent of Americans support LGBTQ protections' & other Wed midday news briefs



As debate over Equality Act rages, new poll shows 75 percent of Americans support LGBTQ protections - Oh? This is interesting. 

Tuesday, March 23, 2021

The Guardian rightfully calls out the attack on transgender children by the GOP, gets the story right.


The Guardian just came out with a wonderful article about how the GOP are exploiting transgender children for political power. I'm of two minds about it. On one hand, it's easily the best article I've read thus far about the attacks on transgender children by the GOP and the religious right.  But on the other hand, it embarrasses me. On the risk of sounding xenophobic, it's a shame that a foreign press (The Guardian is a British newspaper) does a better job talking about an issue in this country than the American press.

With the slow death of print media, too many pundits and just about all of them doing very little work for large salaries and generous book deals, outside groups pushing talking points disguised as facts, not to mention  the right-wing propaganda factory known as Fox News and it's crew of slop artists, the American media model seems to be broken.

The Guardian is a good reminder that there are journalists who still exist to get the story accurate. There are so many good portions of the article, so I am just going to highlight a few. Feel free to read the entire thing and share it. 


1. “They are acting like we aren’t humans, that we don’t deserve the same things as them,” said Kris Wilka, a 13-year-old football player and trans boy in South Dakota, where lawmakers have passed legislation that would prohibit trans students from playing on the sports teams that correspond with their gender. 

 “Trans rights have been turned into a wedge issue,” said Jules Gill-Peterson, professor of gender, sexuality and women’s studies at the University of Pittsburgh, who has researched the history of trans children in the US. “The Republican party is hardly interested in defending women’s sports. This is a purely calculated political play,” Gill-Peterson said. “And it’s really easy to use children as a political football, because we don’t grant children the privilege to speak for themselves and defend their own interests.”

2. “They’re telling parents of cisgender children that you’re losing something by allowing transgender youth to play in sports,” said Alphonso David, president of the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), an LGBTQ+ rights group. “We’ve seen this playbook before – you’re losing something if you allow same-sex couples to marry, if you protect racial minorities in the workplace, if immigration laws are respected. It’s us v them.”

 But there is no research suggesting that trans girls have a competitive advantage. When the Associated Press recently contacted lawmakers behind the proposed bans, most couldn’t cite a single local example of a trans girl playing sports. Some pointed to a Connecticut case in which cisgender girls’ families sued, alleging that two trans female sprinters had an unfair advantage. 

 But two days after that lawsuit was filed, one of the cis girls beat her trans competitor in a state championship race, noted Dr Jack Turban, a child psychiatry fellow at Stanford . . . 

3.For the trans kids targeted by these bills, the consequences could be harmful to their wellbeing and in some cases deadly, advocates said. Trans youth already attempt suicide at a rate more than three times greater than their cisgender peers. 

 Even the introduction of the bills was damaging youths’ mental health, said Turban: “All around the country, these kids are hearing these messages that powerful politicians want to take away their rights.” Kris, the 13-year-old South Dakota boy, said football had transformed his life. After he joined his South Dakota school team last year, he made some of his closest friends and came to excel as a starting lineman. His middle school teammates and coaches didn’t care that Kris was trans, a sharp contrast from his previous school where administrators told him he couldn’t play on boys’ teams: “They treated me as any other kid on the team, and that’s what I wanted. I didn’t want to be the outcast. They gave me the position they thought I deserved.” 

 Now, Kris lives in fear that he could lose it all.  . . .

This is how it's done. Talking to the people involved, particularly the folks who would be most affected - in this case trans children. And don't allow yourself to be a sounding board for talking points. Impart accurate information and fill in the holes.

'Arkansas legislation targets LGBTQ health care while SD governor wants to ban trans athletes nationwide' & other Tue midday news briefs



Sweeping legislation allowing LGBTQ patients to be refused healthcare services over ‘conscience’ on governor’s desk 


Folks think they are being cute with legislation targeting LGBTQ folks in the above news briefs, but be forewarned. Y'all don't want any of this smoke. Neither attempt has a leg to stand on, but if you want to wreck your reputations with unapologetic bigotry, we are set to not only let you, but help you along the road.


AZ State Rep. Andrés Cano knows how to take on the GOP majority to defend LGBTQ rights - Sounds interesting. 


LGBTQ students at Christian colleges face more harassment, survey finds - Christian colleges which probably have no probably taking LGBTQ tax dollars I bet.

Monday, March 22, 2021

How Fox News is contributing to the targeting of transgender Americans

 

 

Editor's note - I could only watch this video once and even then I couldn't finish it. So a huge trigger warning for folks, particularly transgender folks. This should not be happening.

It is not the custom of Fox News to host members of the transgender community or medical professionals with any expertise in transgender health care. But the network personalities and their guests have no problem engaging in all sorts of transphobic rhetoric as seen in the above video.

This goes beyond nasty when a widely watched "news"  network will repeatedly degrade and dehumanize transgender Americans without even giving them courtesy of defending themselves.

It's downright dangerous. It sends a false message to transgender men, women, and children that they are not deserving of love and respect, even from themselves. And even worse, it sends a message of allegiance and approval to transphobic actions, including violence. Last year, there was an ugly surge in transphobic crimes and this year doesn't promise to be any better with entities like Fox News and the conservative propaganda engine creating a false "war on women's sports" and a real war on transgender healthcare.

 If Fox News openly did this to African-Americans or people of the Jewish faith, the blowback would be justifiably enormous There needs to be an equally negative blowback in this case. Fox News isn't debating transgender issues. The network is deliberately targeting transgender people.

Sunday, March 21, 2021

Anti-transgender book called out for numerous errors months before author testified in front of Senate committee

Abigail Shrier's anti-transgender book was called out for numerous errors months before she testified before Congress against of the Equality Act.


In the world of the anti-LGBTQ propaganda, bad faith players are highly important. Bad faith players are legitimate researchers, physicians or journalists who have decided to lay their integrity on the altar of bigotry for either personal reasons or a high paycheck. 

They come out with junk science studies, cherry-picked works or books which denounce LGBTQ people. They then become hyped by the religious right and conservatives until - and this always happens - their work and motives are legitimately questioned and it is discovered that they have not been altogether honest in their claims and research.

In the 80s and 90s, LGBTQ people had to deal with  researcher Paul Cameron, who made an infamous name for himself via his now highly discredited studies. During the marriage equality fight of the mid 2000's, there was Mark Regenrus attempting to pass off his bad work as legitimate in a sad last ditch effort to make the case against marriage equality.

And now while we are knee deep in attacks on the transgender community via bad legislation, a new bad faith player has taken centerstage.

Abigail Shrier.

Friday, March 19, 2021

'SC Democrat under fire for sponsorship of anti-trans bill, false idea of health care for trans youth' & other Fri midday news briefs

 

SC Rep Cezar McKnight has false ideas about health care for trans youth

Democratic Politician Is Architect of South Carolina Anti-Trans Bill - This guy is simply ignorant. He's proposing a bill against trans healthcare and doesn't even know what it entails. Take this passage for example: 

McKnight, whose legislative district is largely rural and two-thirds Black, says that his constituents support the legislation. “Black Democrats tend to be more conservative than white progressives,” McKnight told The Associated Press. “I would not have ever put this bill forward if I didn’t think the people in my district wouldn’t be receptive, and they are. Pastors, young parents, older parents, they all tell me the same thing: if you want to do this, wait until you’re 18.” 

 That's just it. Transgender youth do not go through any type of "surgery."


Exclusive: Violence Against Women Act to offer support to LGBTQ survivors - Thank you!