Gay KKK - Funny or offensive?

This is a short clip but I want your opinion on it. Is it funny or offensive?(I'm embarrassed to say that I laughed my head off).

Jon Stewart says what the media is too chicken@#$! to say about Fox News

I've come to the conclusion that I shouldn't worry about Fox News. Everyone knows the network is biased and is trying to undermine President Obama but I guess desensitization has set in.

More than anything, Fox News being able to get away with it's nonsense simply emphasizes how corrupt the Washington media is. There are too many former campaign workers, trust fund babies and thinktank bloodsuckers masquerading as journalists.

To wit, Fox News will continue to get away with what it does until the network causes some serious damage. Then watch how these same lazy newspeople wring their hands in mock sadness as they proclaim they "never figured that Fox News's bullshit would culminate into something tragic."

But what do you think would be the end result of comparing the President to Hitler, claiming that he is make America less safe, is buying votes for health care, etc. etc.?

In the meantime, thank goodness for people like Jon Stewart who does the job that the news media is supposed to do:

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart	Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Anchor Management
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Health Care Reform

Who is holding up Chai Feldblum's nomination? and other Thursday midday news briefs

Which Senator Has a Secret 'Hold' on Gay Nominee Chai Feldblum? - And the coward won't reveal him/herself. Why am I not surprised?

Peter LaBarbera Running For GOP Seat - Scary, isn't it?

Democrats vow quick end to 'don't ask, don't tell' as Senate bill is introduced - We will see what happens.

Our Nation's Policies Will Now Be Determined Solely By The FDA - This just in - Matt Barber is nuts.

Donohue: When It Comes to Gays, the GOP Gets All Jittery and Inarticulate -Oh if only that were true.

Attacks on gay students no big deal to the religious right

The American Family Association's One News Now seems to be up in arms about the bill from Congressman Jared Polis which is aimed at stopping the bullying of gay students in America's schools:

Concern is rising over a bill in Congress that would provide special protections for students who claim they are discriminated against because of their "perceived sexual orientation."

Earlier this year, Colorado representative Jared Polis introduced a bill known as The Student Non-Discrimination Act, or H.R. 4530. The Democrat claimed the legislation would put homosexual students on "equal footing" with their peers, much as Title VI of the Civil Rights Act did for minorities and Title IX did for women.

Neal McCluskey (Cato Institute)But Neal McCluskey, associate director of the Center for Educational Freedom at the Cato Institute, believes the government is using this bill to try and give people protective status based on their class.

"When government starts to say, 'No, because you belong to this group you get extra protection,' that's very disturbing," he comments. "We want equal protection under the law."

McCluskey adds that this legislation holds a more specific problem.

"It's such a broad definition that any student who might say anything remotely critical about homosexual lifestyles, any opinion they might have, could be punished under this law," he explains. "And if they're not punished for expressing what's a totally valid opinion, then the school could be punished, and that simply isn't acceptable in a free society because it curbs people's free speech rights."

The article is standard example of how not to write a news story on so many levels. First of all, "concern is rising" from whom? I'd venture to say no one but those guillible to take in this article as truth.

Secondly, the article does not say just what "special" or "extra" protection gay students would receive."Special protection" is another way of saying "special rights," which is an old religious right talking point about gays and lesbians

Lastly, McCluskey's statement can be seen differently if one would add just a few changes:


McCluskey adds that this legislation holds a more specific problem.

"It's such a broad definition that any student who might say anything remotely critical about homosexual lifestyles (like calling a gay student a "faggot,") any opinion they might have, could be punished under this law," he explains. "And if they're not punished for expressing what's a totally valid opinion (like threatening the gay student with violence), then the school could be punished (for not protecting the gay student), and that simply isn't acceptable in a free society because it curbs people's free speech rights. (because students should be free to call gay students derogatory names or threaten their lives)."

Okay, maybe I took too many liberties with McCluskey's words but I did so to make a point about him and One News Now.

The bullying of gay students is a huge problem in our nation's schools. There are too many stories of children getting beat up or committing suicide because of homophobia.

And those are the stories we know about. Let us not forget the children who are forced to drop out of school because of the attacks against them - students who are robbed of an education and the ability of achieving their full potential simply because of the ignorance of other students and the inability of schools to address the problem.

It is an issue that needs to be tackled with intensity instead of being minimized by a pseudo Christian publication and a thinktank syncophant.

Related article:

'Smear the Queer': Gay Students Tell Their Stories

H.R. 4530 – The “Student Non-Discrimination Act” (SNDA)

Congratulations D.C.!

Stuff like this always gives me hope for the future. We are going to win this fight:

GOP attacking DADT study BEFORE it even comes out and other Wednesday midday news briefs

GOP: military's study of DADT will be biased - This is what's called "gaming the referee." The GOP is obviously running scared.

NOM's grassroots are showing - National Organization for Marriage's true colors are showing.

Reuters: Uganda’s Anti-Gay Bill Hinders Investments - And they deserve it.

American Political Science Association Moves Conference From Uganda - More backlash against Uganda is a good thing.

Free Republic - The only people who take Paul Cameron's DADT ramblings seriously

This is hilarious and yes I am posting it for a laugh.

As we all know, discredited researcher Paul Cameron has been sticking his nasty tentacles in the argument over the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell and claiming that if the law is repealed, gays will be encouraged to rape their fellow service members.

Now he has come out with a new piece entitled Gays in Military = Sex in the Barracks and if you have an question just what this piece is about, his opening paragraph removes all doubt:

If homosexuals are allowed to serve in the military, they will be recruiting in the showers, having sex in the barracks, and straights will undergo sensitivity training. Before long, the U.S. may be defended by the sex-obsessed and those who can tolerate kowtowing to them.

These are the truths that no one will speak.

Forget about ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ (DADT). The issue is NOT about whether those engaging in homosexual sex are, or are not, asked about their ‘sexual preferences.’ The real issue is whether the federal law against sodomy in the armed forces will be abolished either by statute or practice. If the law is abolished, not only will there be open homosexual sex in the barracks, but regulations against hostility to it will be enforced with vigor.

Of course, almost no one else is saying these things. So how can FRI be sure they are true?

It is the ‘nature’ of most homosexuals to ‘do their thing’ — and the more public the better. This characteristic has been noted throughout history. Sex, to the homosexually addicted, is close to the be-all and end-all of life. Why else have 300,000 male homosexuals died of AIDS, even though the mechanism — penile-anal sex — has been known since 1983? Why else do so many homosexuals engage in public sex? Why are there ‘gay pride’ parades?

How else to explain Adam Lambert? Instead of becoming just another rich ‘star,’ on November 22, he performed at the American Music Awards, broadcast on ABC. During his number, he proceeded to grind one of his dancer’s faces into his pelvis, grab the crotch of another, and passionately kiss his male keyboardist1. That “performance is something I’m extremely proud of and I wouldn’t change a thing. I am glad it facilitated a conversation about what kind of double standards there are out there.”

Only in the screwed up mind of Paul Cameron can there be a connection between the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell and American Idol's Adam Lambert.

But that's not the funny part of this piece by a longshot. The apex of hilarity is that the folks at Free Republic actually take this junk as fact. In between demanding President Obama's birth certificate and thinking that Sarah Palin is the second coming of Joan of Arc, the Freepers are actually anointing Cameron as the bastion of sense against Don't Ask, Don't Tell.

I guess there is accounting for taste . . . or lack thereof:

Check out some of the comments:

If you are a heterosexual, you are in danger.

If a homo lays hands on a hetero, under the new proposed rules, the homo will have the upper hand. I predict murders over this. All of it is unnecessary. Just another way for Obama to humiliate and create dissent in the military.

It will change because then they will demand that the military march in gay pride parades and recruit at gay pride events. It is already happening. Also it will lead to people who dare express any affront to homosexual bad behavior being placed at risk. Say you are in the barracks and sexually harassing language or touching occurs that is considered “all in fun to homosexuals” those that dare report it would find themselves to the disadvantage. People say nothing would change. It already is and for the worse.

This is precisely what I've been saying for months. Homosexuals somehow seem to find each other, and they cluster around each other. I'm sure, as time goes on, there will be command areas that become more gay friendly than others. In these areas, it will be like a gay bath house, a virtual Sodom & Gomorrah.

““When I joined the military it was illegal to be homosexual, then it became optional. I’m getting out before it becomes mandatory!””

When I was in the military, some guys decided to get out, claiming to be homo’s.

While their paperwork was being processed they moved to series of special barracks. We had various names for those but that isn’t the point.

The worst scutt duty was be put on night watch for those barracks to keep an orgy from breaking out.

There would also be affirmative action in promotions for homos.
“We need a gay squad leader in that platoon, Captain. See to it.”
“Yes, sir Colonel”.

Actually the promoters of the homo-nazi agenda want the military weakened, it’s a two-fer for them. Promoting homosexuality, *and* weaken the military. I do not see this as inevitable. I foresee turmoil that will cause a shift in the direction we (as a country) are on.

The “gay lifestyle” is about sex - as much as possible, on demand, and usually anonymous. It is NOT about acheiving equality, marriage, or anything else. That is the fake vaneer that is put on it.

You all will forgive me for not posting the pictures included with some of these comments. But even I have to draw the line.