Apparently some on the right are blowing off the embarrassment of their recent unsuccessful attack against Education Dep. appointee Kevin Jennings because they are starting a new one. The following nonsense (which is better described by the World Net Daily piece) is currently running on several blogs and sites.
Hannity will probably grab it next week:
A transcript from a 1997 speech shows Office of Safe Schools chief Kevin Jennings in the U.S. Department of Education expressed his admiration for Harry Hay, one of the nation's first homosexual activists who launched the Mattachine Society in 1948, founded the Radical Faeries and was a longtime advocate for the North American Man-Boy Love Association, NAMBLA.
"One of the people that's always inspired me is Harry Hay," the transcript shows Jennings saying, "who started the first ongoing gay rights groups in America. In 1948, he tried to get people to join the Mattachine Society. It took him two years to find one other person who would join.
"Well, [in] 1993," Jennings continued, "Harry Hay marched with a million people in Washington, who thought he had a good idea 40 years before."
However, according to Media Matters, the speech had nothing to do with NAMBLA:
Media Matters contends that Jennings was referring to Hay's pioneering work with lgbt rights; something that several obituaries also did when Hay passed on.
What's happening here is innuendo by association. I also admire Harry Hay's work for lgbt rights but I certainly don't like his support of NAMBLA.
So am I a pedophile now?
Many Americans list George Washington as one of the greatest Presidents this country ever had.
But Washington did nothing to stop the slave trade nor did he do anything to get women the vote.
So do the Americans who admire Washington for how he led this country at its founding support slavery and keeping women away from the ballot box?
This entire thing is ridiculous and the root of it is homophobia, pure and simple.
I wish the right would have the guts to admit it.
Analyzing and refuting the inaccuracies lodged against the lgbt community by religious conservative organizations. Lies in the name of God are still lies.
Saturday, October 03, 2009
Friday, October 02, 2009
Know your lgbt history - California Suite
What a week, what a week!
After all of the petty ugliness of the Kevin Jennings controversy, I thought that I would devote this edition of Know Your LGBT History to some light comedy.
California Suite (1978) was a comedy written by Pulitzer Prize winning playwright Neil Simon.
It featured four episodes regarding the misadventures of couples who check into a ritzy hotel for the weekend.
Between you and me, the movie misses a lot, especially an opportunity to make the most of a once-in-a-lifetime team up of legendary comedians Bill Cosby and the late Richard Pryor.
The only place the movie does hit its mark is when it comes to the couple from England.
One of my favorite actresses of all time, Maggie Smith, portrays a distinguished English actress who has just gotten her first Oscar nomination for a silly comedy. She and her husband (Michael Caine) are in town for the ceremony.
As they prepare for the Oscars and the eventual letdown of her loss (her character does not win), they hilariously tear each other apart as they examine their relationship.
It seems that Smith's husband is gay, a fact that she is aware of and does not seem to mind. That is until after she loses and in the middle of her sadness needs some "physical comfort."
Smith and Caine are at the top of their game here. Whenever I rented California Suite, I always fast forwarded through the other couples to get to these two.
Interesting bit of trivia - Smith would win an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress for this role, making it the first time someone has ever won an Oscar for portraying an Oscar loser.
Enjoy:
Past Know Your LGBT History postings:
Know your lgbt history - Taxi (Elaine's Strange Triangle)
Know your lgbt history - Come Back Charleston Blue
Know your lgbt history - James Bond goes gay
Know your lgbt history - Windows
Know your lgbt history - To Wong Foo and Priscilla
Know your lgbt history - Blazing Saddles
Know your lgbt history - Sanford and Son
Know your lgbt history - In Living Color
Know your lgbt history - Cleopatra Jones and her lesbian drug lords
Know your lgbt history - Norman, Is That You?
Know your lgbt history - The 'Exotic' Adrian Street
Know your lgbt history - The Choirboys
Know your lgbt history - Eddie Murphy
Know your lgbt history - The Killing of Sister George
Know your lgbt history - Hanna-Barbera cartoons pushes the 'gay agenda
'Know your lgbt history - Cruising
Know your lgbt history - Foxy Brown and Cleopatra Jones
Know your lgbt history - I Got Da Hook Up
Know your lgbt history - Fright Night
Know your lgbt history - Flowers of Evil
The Jeffersons and the transgender community
After all of the petty ugliness of the Kevin Jennings controversy, I thought that I would devote this edition of Know Your LGBT History to some light comedy.
California Suite (1978) was a comedy written by Pulitzer Prize winning playwright Neil Simon.
It featured four episodes regarding the misadventures of couples who check into a ritzy hotel for the weekend.
Between you and me, the movie misses a lot, especially an opportunity to make the most of a once-in-a-lifetime team up of legendary comedians Bill Cosby and the late Richard Pryor.
The only place the movie does hit its mark is when it comes to the couple from England.
One of my favorite actresses of all time, Maggie Smith, portrays a distinguished English actress who has just gotten her first Oscar nomination for a silly comedy. She and her husband (Michael Caine) are in town for the ceremony.
As they prepare for the Oscars and the eventual letdown of her loss (her character does not win), they hilariously tear each other apart as they examine their relationship.
It seems that Smith's husband is gay, a fact that she is aware of and does not seem to mind. That is until after she loses and in the middle of her sadness needs some "physical comfort."
Smith and Caine are at the top of their game here. Whenever I rented California Suite, I always fast forwarded through the other couples to get to these two.
Interesting bit of trivia - Smith would win an Oscar for Best Supporting Actress for this role, making it the first time someone has ever won an Oscar for portraying an Oscar loser.
Enjoy:
Past Know Your LGBT History postings:
Know your lgbt history - Taxi (Elaine's Strange Triangle)
Know your lgbt history - Come Back Charleston Blue
Know your lgbt history - James Bond goes gay
Know your lgbt history - Windows
Know your lgbt history - To Wong Foo and Priscilla
Know your lgbt history - Blazing Saddles
Know your lgbt history - Sanford and Son
Know your lgbt history - In Living Color
Know your lgbt history - Cleopatra Jones and her lesbian drug lords
Know your lgbt history - Norman, Is That You?
Know your lgbt history - The 'Exotic' Adrian Street
Know your lgbt history - The Choirboys
Know your lgbt history - Eddie Murphy
Know your lgbt history - The Killing of Sister George
Know your lgbt history - Hanna-Barbera cartoons pushes the 'gay agenda
'Know your lgbt history - Cruising
Know your lgbt history - Foxy Brown and Cleopatra Jones
Know your lgbt history - I Got Da Hook Up
Know your lgbt history - Fright Night
Know your lgbt history - Flowers of Evil
The Jeffersons and the transgender community
LaBarbera actively pushing lie against Kevin Jennings
To answer the question of my post this morning, I don't think some members of the religious right are ready to apologize to Kevin Jennings as of yet.
Our "friend," Peter LaBarbera is re-publishing a post on his webpage by the Illinois Family Institute slamming Jennings.
The post was from September 30 and it includes the inaccuracy that the young man Jennings counseled was 15.
LaBarbera is presently running the piece unchanged even though it has been confirmed that the young man was 16 and thus of legal age in Massachusetts.
This means that LaBarbera is actively pushing a blatant lie.
Other news briefs:
Real Mainers step up for 'No on 1' ads - The anti-gay marriage folks in Maine are using stock photos while our side are using real people.
Morehouse College fires an employee responsible for sending biased email from work addy - I don't like to see people fired but the employee was in the wrong. Period.
Anti-gay-marriage fundraising to be investigated - Two words - HOT DAMN!
Our "friend," Peter LaBarbera is re-publishing a post on his webpage by the Illinois Family Institute slamming Jennings.
The post was from September 30 and it includes the inaccuracy that the young man Jennings counseled was 15.
LaBarbera is presently running the piece unchanged even though it has been confirmed that the young man was 16 and thus of legal age in Massachusetts.
This means that LaBarbera is actively pushing a blatant lie.
Other news briefs:
Real Mainers step up for 'No on 1' ads - The anti-gay marriage folks in Maine are using stock photos while our side are using real people.
Morehouse College fires an employee responsible for sending biased email from work addy - I don't like to see people fired but the employee was in the wrong. Period.
Anti-gay-marriage fundraising to be investigated - Two words - HOT DAMN!
Religious right owes Kevin Jennings an apology
You are so pathetic Alvin. Hanging on a technicality. You are as corrupt as the perverted movement you serve. Spare me the preaching.
Peter LaBarbera
After all of the time and energy he devoted to demonizing Obama appointee Kevin Jennings, Peter LaBarbera doesn't even have the decency to apologize for his inaccurate assumption that Jennings counseled an underage child to have sex with an adult.
I won't even publish what else he said about Jennings because I know some folks would really get angry. Needless to say, however, the unposted material proves the safety of children was the last thing on LaBarbera's mind when he attacked Jennings.
Meanwhile, he has focused attention on another member of GLSEN in a pathetic attempt to salvage some degree of credibility.
And LaBarbera is not alone in his duplicity.
Via Goodasyou comes the news that the Family Research Council issued a statement unbelievable in its audacity and willingness to distort the situation.
For people like Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Michelle Malkin, and the rest of Fox News, this is just old hat; attacks on Jennings was politics as usual. Politics has been called the eternal sea where controversies rise and ebb on a daily basis and they were just merely "going with the flow."
However for people like LaBarbera, Tony Perkins, and the organizations they represent whose entire credibility lies with the fact that they are fighting for Godly principles, this moment has to be an embarrassment.
And in a perfect world, those who would defend people like Perkins and LaBarbera would question whether or not they deserve these defenses.
I'm not talking about the rabid supporters; the ones who think that lgbts lurk about in every corner looking to corrupt.
I'm talking about the supporters who are really comfortable of the methodology of the religious right but agree with the notion of so-called traditional values and morality.
Since when is it moral or traditional to drag a man's reputation through the mud, to look through past writings and speeches to find something that can be manipulated and sleazed up in order to brand someone?
And since when is it moral or traditional to not own up when you have been proven wrong?
Phony traditional values groups and figures have been lying about lgbts for so long that I doubt this will be the incident which finally shows them for the morally empty entities that they are.
But it's nice to dream.
UDPATE - Media Matters gives the final word on the matter:
EXCLUSIVE: Media Matters confirms student at center of Fox fueled Jennings controversy was of legal age.
In addition, Media Matters interviewed the young man who Jennings counseled, Brewster. Brewster, who is now in his mid-30s, said the following:
Since I was of legal consent at the time, the fifteen-minute conversation I had with Mr. Jennings twenty-one years ago is of nobody's concern but his and mine. However, since the Republican noise machine is so concerned about my "well-being" and that of America's students, they'll be relieved to know that I was not "inducted" into homosexuality, assaulted, raped, or sold into sexual slavery.
In 1988, I had taken a bus home for the weekend, and on the return trip met someone who was also gay. The next day, I had a conversation with Mr. Jennings about it. I had no sexual contact with anybody at the time, though I was entirely legally free to do so. I was a sixteen year-old going through something most of us have experienced: adolescence. I find it regrettable that the people who have the compassion and integrity to protect our nation's students are themselves in need of protection from homophobic smear attacks. Were it not for Mr. Jennings' courage and concern for my well-being at that time in my life, I doubt I'd be the proud gay man that I am today.
- Brewster
UPDATE 2 - Peter LaBarbera is re-publishing a post on his webpage by the Illinois Family Institute slamming Jennings.
The post was from September 30 and it includes the inaccuracy that the young man Jennings counseled was 15.
LaBarbera is presently running the piece unchanged even though it has been confirmed that the young man was 16 and thus of legal age in Massachusetts; a fact that he is aware of based upon his email to me.
The lgbt community needs to remember and remind people of how the right tried to destroy Kevin Jennings every chance we get.
Related post:
New facts vindicate Kevin Jennings - the young man he counseled was of legal age
Peter LaBarbera
After all of the time and energy he devoted to demonizing Obama appointee Kevin Jennings, Peter LaBarbera doesn't even have the decency to apologize for his inaccurate assumption that Jennings counseled an underage child to have sex with an adult.
I won't even publish what else he said about Jennings because I know some folks would really get angry. Needless to say, however, the unposted material proves the safety of children was the last thing on LaBarbera's mind when he attacked Jennings.
Meanwhile, he has focused attention on another member of GLSEN in a pathetic attempt to salvage some degree of credibility.
And LaBarbera is not alone in his duplicity.
Via Goodasyou comes the news that the Family Research Council issued a statement unbelievable in its audacity and willingness to distort the situation.
For people like Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Michelle Malkin, and the rest of Fox News, this is just old hat; attacks on Jennings was politics as usual. Politics has been called the eternal sea where controversies rise and ebb on a daily basis and they were just merely "going with the flow."
However for people like LaBarbera, Tony Perkins, and the organizations they represent whose entire credibility lies with the fact that they are fighting for Godly principles, this moment has to be an embarrassment.
And in a perfect world, those who would defend people like Perkins and LaBarbera would question whether or not they deserve these defenses.
I'm not talking about the rabid supporters; the ones who think that lgbts lurk about in every corner looking to corrupt.
I'm talking about the supporters who are really comfortable of the methodology of the religious right but agree with the notion of so-called traditional values and morality.
Since when is it moral or traditional to drag a man's reputation through the mud, to look through past writings and speeches to find something that can be manipulated and sleazed up in order to brand someone?
And since when is it moral or traditional to not own up when you have been proven wrong?
Phony traditional values groups and figures have been lying about lgbts for so long that I doubt this will be the incident which finally shows them for the morally empty entities that they are.
But it's nice to dream.
UDPATE - Media Matters gives the final word on the matter:
EXCLUSIVE: Media Matters confirms student at center of Fox fueled Jennings controversy was of legal age.
In addition, Media Matters interviewed the young man who Jennings counseled, Brewster. Brewster, who is now in his mid-30s, said the following:
Since I was of legal consent at the time, the fifteen-minute conversation I had with Mr. Jennings twenty-one years ago is of nobody's concern but his and mine. However, since the Republican noise machine is so concerned about my "well-being" and that of America's students, they'll be relieved to know that I was not "inducted" into homosexuality, assaulted, raped, or sold into sexual slavery.
In 1988, I had taken a bus home for the weekend, and on the return trip met someone who was also gay. The next day, I had a conversation with Mr. Jennings about it. I had no sexual contact with anybody at the time, though I was entirely legally free to do so. I was a sixteen year-old going through something most of us have experienced: adolescence. I find it regrettable that the people who have the compassion and integrity to protect our nation's students are themselves in need of protection from homophobic smear attacks. Were it not for Mr. Jennings' courage and concern for my well-being at that time in my life, I doubt I'd be the proud gay man that I am today.
- Brewster
UPDATE 2 - Peter LaBarbera is re-publishing a post on his webpage by the Illinois Family Institute slamming Jennings.
The post was from September 30 and it includes the inaccuracy that the young man Jennings counseled was 15.
LaBarbera is presently running the piece unchanged even though it has been confirmed that the young man was 16 and thus of legal age in Massachusetts; a fact that he is aware of based upon his email to me.
The lgbt community needs to remember and remind people of how the right tried to destroy Kevin Jennings every chance we get.
Related post:
New facts vindicate Kevin Jennings - the young man he counseled was of legal age
Thursday, October 01, 2009
New facts vindicate Kevin Jennings - the young man he counseled was of legal age
I was planning to post a piece comparing the pseudo controversy of children singing a song praising President Obama to past phony moral panics put on by the religious right.But something caught my eye today via Americablog.
CNN covered the Kevin Jennings controversy and revealed a few facts that even I wasn't aware of.
And they aren't negative facts:
And if that's not enough, according to Media Matters:
. . . Jennings' attorney wrote in a 2004 letter that the student was 16 years old, which Jennings' book appears to support, and that 16 is -- and was at the time -- the legal age of consent in Massachusetts.
The funny thing about this is that a friend of mine, Matt Algren, has said from the beginning that the young man was the legal age of consent.
Take a bow, Matt. You nailed it!
I went to the mat for Jennings because I believed in what he was doing and I know how the religious right distorts situations.
Please don't think I'm gloating when I say this because I am not, but:
It feels good to be vindicated.
UPDATE - Peter LaBarbera gives statement about the latest developments in Jennings controversy
I wondered what folks like Peter LaBarbera felt about this new information.
LaBarbera published a lot of negative pieces on Jennings such as:
Was Troubled Teen Seduced by Adult Homosexual and Counseled by GLSEN Founder Kevin Jennings Really ‘Gay’?
Washington Times: Obama ‘Safe Schools’ Czar Kevin Jennings Enabled Sexual Predator of Teen Boy
I emailed LaBarbera saying that I felt he owes Jennings an apology. This is his reply:
You are so pathetic Alvin. Hanging on a technicality. You are as corrupt as the perverted movement you serve. Spare me the preaching.
So much for the Christian principle of apologizing when you are wrong.
Related posts:
Let's not be so quick to blame Obama if Kevin Jennings is dismissed
Washington Times publishes ugly hit piece on Kevin Jennings
The new attack on Kevin Jennings - he said something ugly about God
The continuing attacks on Kevin Jennings - now Fox News gets involved
The possible attack on the President's lgbt appointees
The tea party idiots - will they go after the lgbt community next?
Traditional Values Coalition attacks Kevin Jennings and . . . Tom Cruise?
Support Sean's Last Wish and Kevin Jennings
The religious right thinks that character assasination is a Christian virtue
The war against Kevin Jennings - now it's getting pathetic
Attacks on Kevin Jennings sleazy, un-Christian
More right wing lunacy on Kevin Jennings courtesy of Kevin McCullough
More attacks on GLSEN'S Kevin Jennings - Now the Family Research Council gets in the act'''
'Fistgate' and President Obama - religious right pushes a pitiful attempt of guilt by association
Homophobic mess at Morehouse, Jennings answers critics, and other Thursday midday news briefs
Homophobic email about same-sex wedding spurs controversy at Morehouse College - Here we go again. Maybe if some folks didn't see black men as a "commodity," this sort of thing wouldn't happen.
A closer look at Donald Mendell, Stand For Marriage Maine's latest talking point - Another Maine anti-gay marriage point exposed as a distortion courtesy of Goodasyou.org
Obama official regrets advice to gay student - Hopefully the final word on the Jennings situation. I love the way Jennings pointed out certain facts about the controversy.
Catania unveils marriage bill - I love it! Harry Jackson will have a fit!
UN: 4 million on AIDS drugs, others still in need - We definitely need to do more.
A closer look at Donald Mendell, Stand For Marriage Maine's latest talking point - Another Maine anti-gay marriage point exposed as a distortion courtesy of Goodasyou.org
Obama official regrets advice to gay student - Hopefully the final word on the Jennings situation. I love the way Jennings pointed out certain facts about the controversy.
Catania unveils marriage bill - I love it! Harry Jackson will have a fit!
UN: 4 million on AIDS drugs, others still in need - We definitely need to do more.
Family Research Council head misrepresents credible information to hurt ENDA
Recently, Family Research Council head Tony Perkins submitted testimony to Congress in opposition of Employment Non-Discrimination Act.The bulk of his testimony were anecdotes of supposedly how ENDA would hurt free speech.
As Goodasyou.org pointed out, at least one of his anecdotes was a distortion of the facts. Perkins claimed that the person in the case was able to sue because he was merely perceived as gay.
Perkins was making the point that the lawsuit in that case was frivilous.
But Jeremy Hooper from Goodasyou.org showed that the person in the case was not only perceived as gay, but also harrassed and fired because of that perception.
And I think I found another sly distortion from Perkins regarding ENDA. The part I want to address is in bold:
The principle at stake is whether personal disapproval of these chosen and harmful behaviors (homosexual conduct and sex changes) should be officially stigmatized under law as a form of bigotry that is equivalent to racism. Since such disapproval is the dominant viewpoint in the American public,explicitly taught by leading religions,and empirically supported by the negative health consequences of those behaviors
Perkins is pushing the "homosexuality has negative consequences" factoid that has served the religious right well for so many years.
The endnotes of his testimony says:
Evidence for the negative health consequences of homosexual conduct is available even from pro-homosexual sources such as the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association. See their "Top Ten Issues to Discuss with Your Healthcare Provider" online at: http://www.glma.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page.viewPage&pageId=586&parentID=533&nodeID=1
To echo Jeremy Hooper in his denunciation of Perkins, it's a matter of perception.
Perkins is pushing the notion that "if people engage in same-sex intercourse, they face negative consequences."
However, at no time does the Top Ten Issues even imply this. This is what it does say:
LGBT people have some unique health needs and concerns. Unfortunately, many health care providers don’t fully understand these issues, so it’s important to take charge of your health by asking your healthcare provider about the health matters that may apply to you.
The following lists will help you communicate even more effectively with your healthcare provider:
However, at no time does the Top Ten Issues even imply this. This is what it does say:
LGBT people have some unique health needs and concerns. Unfortunately, many health care providers don’t fully understand these issues, so it’s important to take charge of your health by asking your healthcare provider about the health matters that may apply to you.
The following lists will help you communicate even more effectively with your healthcare provider:
10 Things Transgender Persons Should Discuss with Their Healthcare Providers (Click here to download .pdf version)
Now while this medical information breakdown does concede that in some cases, lgbts face bigger health problems than the heterosexual population, at no time does it ever say anything about these health problems being the "negative effects of homosexual behavior."
But it does say few things that Perkins may not appreciate. For example, take the subject of depression/anxiety in the lesbian community:
Lesbians have been shown to experience chronic stress from homophobic discrimination. This stress is compounded by the need that some still have to hide their orientation from family and colleagues at work, and by the fact that many lesbians have lost the important emotional support most others get from their families due to alienation stemming from their sexual orientation.
Or substance abuse:
Research indicates that lesbians may use illicit drugs more often than heterosexual women. This may be due to added stressors in lesbian lives from discrimination. Lesbians need support from each other and from health care providers to find healthy releases, quality recreation, stress reduction, and coping techniques.
Or how about this point regarding how difficult it is for the members of the transgender community to receive adequate health care:
Transgender persons are often reluctant to seek medical care through a traditional provider-patient relationship. Some are even turned away by providers. A doctor who refuses to treat a trans person may be acting out of fear and transphobia, or may have a religious bias against GLBT patients. It’s also possible that the doctor simply doesn’t have the knowledge or experience he needs. Furthermore, health care related to transgender issues is usually not covered by insurance, so it is more expensive. Whatever the reasons, transgender people have sometimes become very ill because they were afraid to visit their providers.
In other words, Perkins made the claim that being an lgbt has "negative health consequences," but cited a pro-gay document which in part said the health problems lgbts face have more to do with dealing with an unaccepting society.
If he weren't so consumed with using the material inaccurately, Perkins would realize that Ten Top Issues actually makes the case for ENDA. Less worries about how you would be perceived on the job as an lgbt leads to less stress. And less stress leads to good health.
Gone are the days when folks like Robert Knight brazenly cited Paul Cameron studies during their Congressional testimony.
But as Perkins proves, members of the religious right still have a way of distorting lgbt lives to suit their agenda.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)