The first experience South Carolina blogger Alvin McEwen had
of hanging out with a group of gay men was not a good one.
“It was one of those college groups devoted to give gay men
a place to talk and be out of the closet.
When I walked into the room and sat down, I immediately took off my
glasses so I couldn’t look any of them in the face. That’s how ashamed I was of
being gay. I had been taken in by all of the negative talk around campus and
especially on television voiced by people like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson.
It’s kind of sad how we as a community either laugh these experiences off or don’t
talk about them.”
That day serves as a stark memory to McEwen 20 year later as
he devotes a considerable amount of time and effort in exposing the anti-gay
propaganda which once made him ashamed of being a gay man.
“No one should feel what I felt back then,” he said.
Since 2007, McEwen has been blog master of Holy Bullies and
Headless Monsters, a site which focuses on refuting anti-gay propaganda spread
by religious right groups. However late
last year, Mc Ewen felt as if he was in a rut. He felt that he was going
nowhere constantly refuting anti-gay propaganda only to hear religious right
spokespeople repeat the propaganda. He asked himself many times just what good
was he doing.
How They See Us is
the first of its kind – a free online booklet which challenges religious right
propaganda, including claims that a large number of pedophiles are gay or gay
men have a very high number of sex partners – but with an original twist.
Instead of writing long-winded refutations, McEwen used the graphic images
created by anti-gay groups and words uttered by their spokespeople to
demonstrate just how ludicrously wrong their claims are. In addition, he also traced
the multiple times in which researchers have cried foul over the distortion of
their work by anti-gay groups.
“The point of
How They See Us is simple,” McEwen said. “Religious right groups today are
constantly spinning tales of gay calamities and horror stories. Then they hide
behind the idea of ‘deeply held religious beliefs.’
But I found proof from 1986 which demonstrates
that it’s all a big lie designed to exploit religious beliefs and fears.”
The proof McEwen speaks
of is a 1986 anti-gay comic book which was endorsed by a former Congressman,
William Dannemeyer, and Beverly LaHaye, founder of the anti-gay group Concerned Women for America. The comic book which makes
up a large part of his booklet , contradicts any claim one hears from anti-gay
groups that they are acting in “Christian love.” McEwen takes various images
from the comic book and compares it to present day religious right rhetoric
about gays, proving that there is no difference between the two.
“Graphic images of hate just gave way to words of hate,”
McEwen said, “and none of it is Christian.”
When it was first published,
How They See Us caught the attention of a few lgbt bloggers as well
as
several lgbt and progressive news
sources, yielding some attention. When this attention died down, McEwen began
an aggressive Facebook and twitter campaign in order to keep the booklet in the
public eye.
This campaign has paid off.
Presently,
How They See Us has over 58,000 direct readers and over 671,000 fans who read it
from embedded sources.
It also has over
700 downloads.
However, the progression of
How They See Us has not been smooth. One problem McEwen had is how
little attention his booklet attracted from the mainstream lgbt media such
The Advocate and
Out magazines and mainstream lgbt organizations such as GLAAD and
HRC.
In all honesty though, McEwen really doesn’t view this as a
problem.
“Gay organizations and magazines have a lot of other things
on their plates, and I certainly don’t blame them for that,” he said. “Plus, I
may not have been able to get away with as much as I did if I had teamed with
them. I may have been forced to tone it down.”
But McEwen sees the second problem as a danger to the lgbt
community. He said there seems to be reluctance in calling out religious right
groups until after the fact when the damage is done.
“We don’t take care of business before these organizations
get a foothold in local communities and in the media,” McEwen said. “Then after
these groups have done their damage, we either gripe or attempt to cram
something together. Why the hell are we waiting until they make the first
move?”
McEwen attributes it to too many members of the lgbt
community being extremely blasé and then raising hell when these anti-gay
groups and their spokespeople are interviewed on the major news networks.
“When we hear that
MSNBC or FOX or CNN will be interviewing people like Tony Perkins of the Family
Research Council or Brian Brown of the National Organization for Marriage, we
demand that they don’t do it on the grounds that these are hate groups. That’s
a huge mistake. Instead of saying that
these organizations get no time, we should be demanding equal time. If NOM or
FRC has someone on these shows, we should be demanding that representatives
from HRC or GLAAD be included. We cannot begin to eradicate anti-gay propaganda
until we stop running from it. We may not take it seriously, but a lot of
others do and our silence only hurts us in this matter.”
How They See Us is
free to the public and McEwen has even emailed several adobe acrobat copies to
individuals who have problems with downloading the online file. Anyone wishing
to have a copy can email him at
Charlekenghis@aol.com
While McEwen’s immediate goal is to attract one million
readers, he has larger aspirations. He wants to transform the debate on lgbt
equality.
“Why is it when there is a debate on lgbt equality, the gay community seems to
always be on the defensive,” McEwen said. “We aren’t doing anything wrong. We
aren’t the ones lying or cherry-picking research. The point of the debate
should never be ‘why are gays deserving of this or that.’ The onus of the
debate should fall on these so-called morality groups. I would like to hear their explanations of
not only why they feel that gays shouldn’t have equality, but why do they call
themselves Christians when one takes into account the levels of lies and
deception they engage in.”
