Tuesday, April 20, 2021

Family Research Council shows its dog whistling and passive-aggressive racism after Derek Chauvin verdict

It's not that black lives don't matter to the Family Research Council. It's just that black lives don't matter if they can't be used for fundraising and scaring FRC's predominantly white audience.


I've called out the Family Research Council and its president, Tony Perkins, numerous times on this blog for the scapegoating  of LGBTQ people via their myriad of lies (check the posts to the right). But this may be the first time I've pointed to the group's dog whistles in terms of racial matters.

Earlier this week, Rep. Maxine Waters gave a speech in Minnesota as people awaited the verdict of the trial of Derek Chauvin for the death of George Floyd.  After the speech, she addressed reporters' questions and caused a firestorm:

She emphasized that “We’re looking for a guilty verdict … for murder,” referring to the trial of Chauvin, the former Minneapolis police officer who is charged with second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in the death of George Floyd in May. . . . The case went to the jury Monday. At one point, she was asked what she thought protesters should do if the jury did not find Chauvin guilty of the murder charge. It’s unclear if she heard the entire context of the question, so part of it was repeated: “What should protesters do?” 

 This is the controversial part. 

 Here’s how she responded: “Well, we’ve got to stay on the street. And we’ve got to get more active. We’ve got to get more confrontational. We’ve got to make sure that they know that we mean business.”

Conservatives, such as Newt Gingrich and Tucker Carlson, claimed that she was encouraging protestors to riot. Her comments also caused some concern trolling from people like pundit Don Lemon. And then the Family Research Council and Perkins had to put their two cents in:

Apparently, today's liberals don't just start riots in their own cities -- they'll travel halfway across the country to start one in yours. Of course, the woman they call "Kerosene Waters" has been starting fires for years, but in Minneapolis, the situation is different. The entire city is hanging on by a thread. Thanks to the perfect storm of the Derek Chauvin trial and the shooting of Daunte Wright, a community that's been on edge for days is one court verdict away from a full-scale firestorm. The last thing anyone there needs is an excuse to turn the city into another pile of smoldering ash. And yet, this congresswoman certainly seemed determined to give them one. 

 "We've got to stay on the street, and we've got to get more active," Waters told the protestors Saturday night. "We've got to get more confrontational. We've got to make sure that they know that we mean business." If Chauvin isn't convicted of George Floyd's death, she warned, "We cannot go away... We've got to demand justice. We've got to make sure that they know that we mean business." If that means Minneapolis burns to the ground, well, it's not her district. If violence breaks out on the streets, it won't be her constituents that could lose businesses, property, their sense of safety, and sleep. As for the Left's double standard on violence, Waters is the current standard-bearer.

FRC was channeling memories of unrest which took place last place year.  The protests were about the murders of black men by police officers, but right-wing organizations like FRC omitted that part and focused on the violence and destruction of property, which was mostly done not by those protesting but outside provocateurs and skirmishes between racists groups (such as the Proud Boys) and anti-racist individuals.

'Marjorie Taylor Greene pushes highly improbable story about drag queen and children' & other Tue midday news briefs

 

Marjorie Taylor Greene

Marjorie Taylor Greene wants a drag queen “arrested & charged” for being near children - Of course she did. Because she is a couple of fries short of a combo. And yes the story she alludes to is bogus. 

'It's not safe': Parents of transgender kids plan to flee their states as GOP bills loom - Meanwhile, here is something which is causing actual harm to children. 

Hundreds of Montana students to protest transgender sports ban bill at state capitol - These legislative attacks on trans kis are backfiring. 



Monday, April 19, 2021

LGBTQ community outlives another homophobe. Judith Reisman supported blaming gays for the Holocaust

Judith Reisman is the latest homophobe which the LGBTQ community has outlived.


So many have come against the LGBTQ community attempting to take away our rights and safety. And they have all failed. They fall by the wayside and yet we are still here and still fighting. Judith Reisman is the latest.

From PinkNews:

Notorious anti-LGBT+ author Judith Reisman, who has blamed “homosexuals” for the rise of the Nazi party and the Holocaust, has died aged 85. Reisman spent her three-decade career on a relentless campaign against long-dead sex researcher Alfred Kinsey and the Kinsey Institute which he founded. 

 But Reisman, who has often been described as the “founder of the modern anti-Kinsey movement” believed that the researcher was responsible for everything from pornography, to sexual assault, and even claimed, without evidence, that he was a paedophile. Vehemently anti-LGBT+, Reisman was a supporter of conspiracy theorist Scott Lively’s book The Pink Swastika, which blames gay people for the Holocaust. The author, who had a PhD in communications yet was a visiting law professor at the anti-LGBT+ Liberty University, wrote multiple bizarre research papers, with titles like Kinsey, Sex and Fraud and ‘Soft Porn’ Plays Hardball.


The Southern Poverty Law Center had this to say about Reisman:

If you have heard of Reisman, it’s probably due to her unrelenting pseudoscientific campaign against Kinsey and the Kinsey Institute. In Reisman’s mind, Kinsey is the cause of all things wrong in the world, including pornography and sexual assault. Her latest work, Sexual Sabotage, which was published in 2010 by the far-right conspiracist WND Books, calls Kinsey a “traitor” to America because in Reisman’s mind, he and his researchers deliberately set out to defame the Greatest Generation and destroy the world. She has repeatedly claimed that Kinsey was a pedophile (there is no evidence to support her contentions), and went so far as to sue the Kinsey Institute for defamation in 1991 when they responded to her wild claims. The suit was dismissed with prejudice in 1994, a year after her conservative lawyer left the case. 

Even Kinsey’s death is a conspiracy, in her mind. Reisman claims that he died of “brutal, repetitive self-abuse” (i.e. masturbation) when in fact he died of heart problems and pneumonia. Some of her other theories are equally dubious. She claims that pornography and homosexuality are imbued with what she calls “erototoxins,” or mind-altering chemicals. In her world, pornography literally rewires the brain and makes it susceptible to things like homosexuality. Little wonder, then, that Reisman is also a staunch crusader against homosexuality, which she often falsely links to pedophilia.

 . . .  Reisman kicked off her career in 1984 when she was awarded a huge grant – just over $700,000 – from the Reagan administration’s conservative Department of Justice to study thirty years of American pornography for evidence of child sexual assault.

 Controversy followed, whether it was about the amount she was awarded, the process by which she got the money (awarded by right-wing publisher Alfred Regnery) or other matters. A December, 1984 article in the American University student paper (where Reisman was based at the time) noted that she appeared to have misrepresented herself on her résumé as the author of a book when in fact she was not. Reisman claimed it was a “secretarial error and poor proofreading”. 

Regardless, the study went on, and when it was completed in 1986, it was panned as unscientific. American University refused to publish it. Loretta Haroian (now deceased), an actual expert on childhood and sexuality, called the report “vigilantism: paranoid, pseudoscientific hyperbole with a thinly veiled, hidden agenda.” 

 That didn’t stop Reisman, however. She published the study in 1989 through her own Institute of Media Education (an on-and-off think tank), of which she was the president. She’s been publishing ever since in the right-wing echo chamber. Her articles and commentary appear with frequency in conservative and hard-right publications like WND, RenewAmerica and Human Events. 

Just one thing to say - bye girl. You will not be missed.

'Poll says Americans overwhelmingly do not support anti-transgender laws' & other Mon midday news briefs

 

New poll shows Americans overwhelmingly oppose anti-transgender laws - And by a large amount, too.




Sunday, April 18, 2021

Video - Coming Out To Your Aunties

 

 
With the junk happening with all of these anti-trans bills, I think we should take a brief  moment to laugh just a little. And this video is just the thing to get us in the mood and ease us into the week. Granted, I know some may get offended, but remember its all in good fun. A gay black man comes out to his aunties and gets an positive reception. But then . . . well you will just have to watch the rest of the video.

Thursday, April 15, 2021

Putting Parents in Jail and Conducting Genital Checks - Anti-Transgender Legislation Just Got More Deranged

Over the past few days, this spate of bills throughout the country targeting transgender kids has sunken to a level of surreal vulgarity.  The narrative has moved from one of "protecting women's sports and children" (which it never was about anyway) to eradication and humiliation.

In Texas, they are considering a bill which would punish parents for supporting their transgender children. 

According to LGBTQnation:

Texas’s S.B. 1646 would redefine child abuse to include “consenting to or assisting in the administering or supplying of, a puberty suppression prescription drug or cross-sex hormone to a child,” as well as other gender-affirming health care procedures, even though puberty blockers are reversible and have been found to significantly reduce suicidal thoughts for trans people.

This bill has been receiving a lot of negative attention and most recently, a speech by a Texas mom, Amber Briggle, in front of the Texas legislature went viral. Biggle tearfully asked legislators not to pass this bill because it would put her at risk for supporting her transgender son. You can see the speech in the above video.

 And as bad as it looks in Texas, Florida made things worse with its anti-trans bill.

According to MSN:

The GOP-led Florida House of Representatives on Wednesday voted 70-44 along party lines to pass HB 1475, which would ban transgender female athletes from competing on women’s athletic teams in both high school and college while subjecting some students-athletes to “genital inspections” before they can play. Also called the “Fairness in Women’s Sports Act,” the measure effectively states that student-athletes who were biological males at the time of their birth cannot compete on women’s athletic teams. Student-athletes born biological females may still compete on male or female teams. According to the legislation, disputes regarding a student’s sex under the law would be resolved with a “health examination and consent form” verifying the student’s biological sex.

The Hill goes into more detail:

"A dispute regarding a student's sex shall be resolved by the student's school or institution by requesting that the student provide a health examination and consent form or other statement signed by the student's personal health care provider which must verify the student's biological sex,” says the bill, which provides for “routine sports physical examination” of students’ reproductive organs, genetic makeup or testosterone levels.

In other words, if someone challenges an athlete's gender in accordance to bill (should it become law) than the student would have to submit to a genital check.  That's simply nasty, not to mention humiliating on so many levels. The bill now goes to the state senate.

All of this anti-trans legislation was meanspirited to begin with. But now, it's just out of control. I don't know if this was the goal of those who wrote and proposed this legislation, but here we are.

I'm scared to contemplate what's going to happen next. There is no other place to go but lower.

'Republicans quietly pushing 'ex-gay therapy' bills into anti-LGBTQ fight' & other Thur midday news briefs


Republicans Quietly Push ‘Conversion Therapy’ Bills In Anti-LGBTQ Fight - Not surprising. If they target one of us, they are targeting all of us. 


What Senate Majority Leader Schumer Is Saying About the Equality Act - Important because this fight could go either way. 

Anti-gay bias led to 'serious flaws' in Toronto serial killer investigation - I HATE posting stuff like this but it is necessary.

Wednesday, April 14, 2021

The Family Research Council whines that the NCAA's support of trans athletes is 'intimidation'


And in the category of  Best Hypocritical Whine of Persecution,  the winner is hate group the Family Research Council for claiming that the NCAA's support of transgender youth against bills targeting them amounts to intimidation:


In case companies hadn't noticed, now isn't exactly a good time to drop a bombshell about radical politics. Either the NCAA hasn't been paying attention to the massive uproar in Georgia, or they don't seem to grasp the intensity of the pushback. Either way, most Americans (including the moderate ones), are fired up about the abuse Republicans are taking over election reform -- and this time, they don't mind saying so. That's bad news for a woke collegiate sports association who's used to dangling a few championship games in front of states and getting their way. 

 When the NCAA first tried this stunt -- way back in 2016 -- it was meddling in the North Carolina privacy bill. Now, five years later, they're upping their extremism by joining the fight against girls' sports. In a statement Monday, the association reminded everyone that their loyalty isn't to women's rights but to "transgender student-athletes," the smallest fringe group of competitors in America. This commitment, they claim, is "grounded in our values of inclusion and fair competition." What it's not grounded in, normal people will argue, is science, morality, common sense, or true equity.

Notice how FRC works a little note in supporting the so-called election reform bills being pushed across the country by the GOP. Aside from demonizing transgender Americans, the group has been surreptitiously pushing support of these bills even though they have been called out for being acts of voter suppression sparked by the lie that Donald Trump lost last year's election due to cheating.

But when it does come to demonizing transgender Americans, FRC isn't any slouch in that department, either. Notice how it speaks about the NCAA's stance not being in grounded in science, morality, common sense, or true equity, when the exact opposite is true.

Science - Many physicians, medical organizations, and researchers have said that these bills have no basis in science

Morality - These bills are a part of a plethora of legislation targeting and scapegoating transgender people - particularly children in general - through disinformation. These bills range from banning trans athletes to denying trans children affirming healthcare. The Family Research Council has played a huge part in this. In one case, FRC deliberately lied about healthcare for trans children by comparing it to "chemical castration." Where is the morality in lying about healthcare while knowing that the denial of this healthcare could be detrimental to children?

Common sense - Supporters of these bills banning trans athletes could not pinpoint any problems which would make them necessary. 

True equity - taking all of these things into account, supporting any of these anti-trans bills, including the one banning trans athletes, has nothing to do with equity. It has much to do with lies, hysteria, and moral panics.

Since FRC peddles the idea that it is an organization which stands up for morality and a "biblical worldview," the following verse from the Bible best describes what it is attempting to do:

Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter. - Isaiah 5:20

'Trans kids bravely defending themselves in the face of bad legislation' & other Wed midday news briefs

 


So many trans kids have been standing up for themselves and others during this time of ridiculous transphobic legislation.

 In other news: 


Parents expected to raise concerns for LGBTQ policies in Lee County schools - And here we go again. Discrepancies and rumors must be addressed. 

Tuesday, April 13, 2021

1992 episode of Donahue talk show highlights the fury of past gay rights debates

 

 

This video is dedicated to those who don't remember how it was for LGBTQ people back in the day before we became more "popular" than we were before, was too young to know, or wasn't born yet. This 1992 episode of Donahue was fire as our folks and members of the religious right went back and forth about gay pride parades and pro-LGBTQ ordinances. You'll notice how some anti-LGBTQ arguments have fallen by the wayside while others remain with us. Also, back then diversity wasn't a strong suit in either community. But mostly if what you see and hear gets you angry, simply console yourself with the fact that things have moved considerably in our favor since 1992.

'Gay teen's family sues school where he was bullied before he died' & other Tue midday news briefs



Gay teen’s family sues the school where he was relentlessly bullied before he died - If schools cannot or will not protect our kids, they will pay a price. Monetarily of course.

 
Bill barring trans athletes from sports could cost SC chance to host NCAA championships - If South Carolina pushes this bill, then it should suffer. It is my state but it's long past time that it learns the price of bigotry. 

6 celebrities who have come out as LGBTQ in 2021 - Just six? We gotta step it up. LOL

Monday, April 12, 2021

NCAA stands in the corner of trans athletes against state bills targeting them


The NCAA is standing in support of trans athletes against a barrage of state bills targeting them

From NBC:

The NCAA, which regulates college athletics in the U.S., backed transgender athletes Monday, saying it won’t hold championship events in locations that aren’t “free of discrimination.” 

 As Republicans in more than two dozen states target transgender athletes, the NCAA Board of Governors said it "firmly and unequivocally supports the opportunity for transgender student-athletes to compete in college sports." 

 It said its "more inclusive" policy for transgender athletes, which requires testosterone suppression treatment for transgender women to compete in women's sports, means “inclusion and fairness can coexist for all student-athletes, including transgender athletes, at all levels of sport.” The board said it would monitor situations regarding trans athletes' participation without specifically mentioning states that have banned it or are considering bans. It did say the "environment" could affect the locations of championship games.

 "When determining where championships are held, NCAA policy directs that only locations where hosts can commit to providing an environment that is safe, healthy and free of discrimination should be selected," the statement said. "We will continue to closely monitor these situations to determine whether NCAA championships can be conducted in ways that are welcoming and respectful of all participants." 

 Asked whether the statement meant the NCAA wouldn't hold championship games in states that passed laws limiting trans athletes' participation, a spokesperson said, "The Board of Governors continues to monitor the situation and has not made a decision regarding championships." 

 Advocates, many of whom have been calling on sports organizations and businesses to take a stand, said the statement was a welcome development. "Dangerous proposals around the country are putting transgender young people at risk," Rodrigo Heng-Lehtinen, deputy executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, said in a statement. "The harm is real and is felt very personally by transgender kids just trying to live their lives as who they really are. The NCAA is making it clear that their Board of Governors supports transgender athletes, and the board should hold those states passing these harmful laws accountable."

The move by state legislatures in 30 states to ban trans athletes is the result of a false narrative that trans female athletes hold an advantage over cis female athletes and are "stealing" victories, records, and scholarships from them. In spite of all of the hype given to this belief, those pushing these bills haven't  been able to find any evidence proving that it is true.  Last month, over 500 college athletes signed a letter asking the NCAA to not host championships in states which ban trans athletes.

'Conservatives are out to stop cancel culture. They should look in the mirror' & other Mon midday news briefs

 

Conservatives are out to stop cancel culture. They should look in the mirror. - Preach it!

How The Prom's Breakout Star Jo Ellen Pellman Is Helping Queer Kids - Happy to spotlight anyone helping our kids. 


Mike Pence’s “traditional” organization for “freedom” will have a hate group leader advising - In anticipation for his presidential run, Pence wants to get back to his "roots."

Sunday, April 11, 2021

Would you have defended Andrew Dice Clay against so-called 'cancel culture?'

For those in the LGBTQ community who whine about "cancel culture" or proclaim that some in the community are "too sensitive," here is a 1987 clip of comedian Andrew Dice Clay doing stand-up about us. Stuff like this helped to wreck his career. The irony is that if it came out now, so many folks, including some of us would actually defend this mess.

 

 What do you think?

Thursday, April 08, 2021

Repost - Sterilization, irreversible surgeries and chemical castrations - How religious right lies corrupts the conversation about trans children

Editor's note - Probably a first for this blog. I am going to re-run a post I published on Wednesday. The post, Sterilization, irreversible surgeries and chemical castrations - How religious right lies corrupts the conversation about trans children, is probably one of the most important pieces I've written in a long time. The religious right have declared war on our transgender children by pushing bills across the nation targeting them and particularly the affirming healthcare they need. And as usual when the religious right declares war on our community, they knowingly tell lies. But there is something exceedingly awful about this time. They know that their lies are specifically hurting transgender children but they simply do NOT care. This is easily the worst thing groups like the Family Research Council and the Alliance Defending Freedom has ever done.  To undermine LGBTQ rights and health is one thing. But to deliberately harm children is simply vile. 

This post will run all weekend. Please read and share if you can.



This week,  Arkansas governor Asa Hutchinson vetoed the bill which would outlaw transgender healthcare for minors. And then by a simple majority, the state legislature overrode the veto, making Arkansas the first state to outlaw affirming healthcare for transgender children.

The Family Research Council sent out a press release celebrating what the Arkansas legislature did:

Today, Arkansas became the first state in the nation to enact legislation that prohibits gender transition procedures on minors, prevents taxpayer funds or medical insurance mandates to pay for them, and provides legal remedies for minors who have been permanently disfigured and/or sterilized by them.

 On Tuesday afternoon, in quick succession the Arkansas House (72-25) and Senate (25-8) overrode the governor's veto of the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act. Family Research Council praised the state legislature for its effort to protect minors. 

 Family Research Council President Tony Perkins released the following statement: "The SAFE Act's successful passage into law is a victory for children and their health and safety. The state of Arkansas has taken the lead in the race to protect children from a political movement that advocates for using off-label drugs and experimental procedures on minors. 

 "As the name implies, the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act protects minors from unscientific, experimental, and destructive gender transition procedures that interrupt their natural development and irreversibly alter their bodies. As a growing number of individuals come forward to share their stories of being permanently disfigured and/or sterilized, there is a growing and urgent need for other states to follow Arkansas' lead by protecting minors from life-altering procedures such as puberty-blocking drugs, cross-sex hormones, and irreversible surgeries. 

The  consistent repetition  of phrases like "life altering procedures" and "irreversible surgeries" and words like "disfigurement" and "sterilization" in FRC's press release isn't happenstance. It has been part of a deliberate attempt to "nauseate" instead of "educate" and exploit unfounded fears for a cynical purpose. By conjuring up false images of minors being forced to undergo surgeries altering their gender and given drugs which would permanently damage their health, those who have been pushing these anti-trans bills - like FRC - have been deliberately appealing to hysteria in a somewhat successful attempt to drown out the voices of the medical professionals who know better and the transgender youth who they falsely claim that they want to protect.

It's an old but highly successful tactic. 

In the past,  religious right groups claimed that marriage equality would "corrupt the innocence" of children.  Or that any pro-LGBTQ legislation would be make it easier for gays to "recruit children" because apparently we need to "refreshen our ranks." They know what they say are lies but they don't care as long as it gives them attention and an advantage, no matter how insane the claims sound.

For example, this is what FRC said in another press release defending Fox News personality Tucker Carlson's lie about transgender healthcare when Governor Hutchinson defended his veto on Carlson's show:

The governor also said he would have supported the bill if it was simply limited to banning castration. But as Carlson pointed out, "This is chemical castration... If you stop puberty and suppress the sex hormones, you're chemically castrating someone." And he wasn't wrong: Like many other "gender clinics" for children, the Arkansas Children's Hospital web site acknowledges on page 2 of this "FAQ for Youth" that puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones are "irreversible."

In attempting to defend Carlson, FRC told a huge lie. The link the organization cited does not say that puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones are "irreversible." The following is the quote FRC distorts:

What is transition and how do I know if it’s right for me?  - social transition is changing your outward appearance (hairstyle, clothing, gender expression) along with your name and pronouns. It is completely reversible. ~medical transition alters physical and sexual characteristics of the body. This can include hormone therapy and surgery, and is not reversible. Medical transition can only happen if your parents/guardians and doctors agree this is right for you.

And guess what? The chemical castration claim is also a lie. It is yet another way of bombarding people with horror stories which appeal to their fears instead of their intelligence. In truth, the following facts about healthcare as it relates to trans youth are so easy to find.  And - further surprise - it has nothing to do with "irreversible surgeries" or castrations:

Reuters - As reported by the Thomson Reuters Foundation in Feb. 2020, a global rise in the number of teenagers seeking to go through gender reassignment has spurred a series of court cases around the age at which young people are able to choose to transition – and who has the final word. Gender reassignment surgery is widely restricted to adults over the age of 18 (here)
The World Professional Association for Transgender Health’s (WPATH) standards of care here , explain the three categories of physical interventions for adolescents. These consist of fully reversible interventions such as hormone suppression to delay puberty, partially reversible interventions such as hormone therapy, and irreversible interventions such as surgical procedures. The association advises that “moving from one stage to another should not occur until there has been adequate time for adolescents and their parents to assimilate fully the effects of earlier interventions.”

 Genital surgery should not happen until the individual reaches the age of majority to give consent in a given country and have lived continuously for at least 12 months in their gender identity, according to the association. Puberty-suppressing medications are reversible, as explained in a 2016 report by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, American College of Osteopathic Pediatricians and the American Academy of Pediatrics here . The report categorizes hormone therapy and gender-affirming surgeries for “older adolescents” and “adults”, not children.

Mayo Clinic - Use of GnRH analogues doesn't cause permanent changes in an adolescent's body. Instead, it pauses puberty, providing time to determine if a child's gender identity is long lasting. It also gives children and their families time to think about or plan for the psychological, medical, developmental, social and legal issues ahead. If an adolescent child stops taking GnRH analogues, puberty will resume. 

When it comes to trans youth, it's not about surgeries or drugs. It's about affirming and supporting who they are. It's about accepting them for who they are and leading them safely down the path to who they are meant to be.

Seriously, this entire attack on transgender children and their healthcare was totally unnecessary if wanting to protect children was the goal.  There was no need for legislation or talking points if wanting to protect children was the goal. There was no need for lies and horror stories if wanting to protect children was the goal. There is enough experts out there and enough information for anyone who truly cared about trans children.

But here is the problem. Those pushing these bills blocking affirming healthcare for trans youth simply don't care. They claim that they want to protect children but to some of them, it's all about their own definition of a world in which children fit their narrow construct.  To others, it's another notch in their belt for the 'culture war.'

To both parties, transgender children are simply collateral damage.



'NC bill would force school staffers to out trans kids' & other Thur midday news briefs

 


North Carolina Bill Would Force School Staffers to Out Trans Kids - What is with these folks


Sterilization, irreversible surgeries and chemical castrations - How religious right lies corrupts the conversation about trans children - My post from last night. I really wish this was a topic of many conversations. Not my post, but the subject of my post. 

‘Pose’ Final Season Trailer Promises Tears, Triumph And Billy Porter - Maybe it will get that Emmy for 'Outstanding Drama Series.'

Wednesday, April 07, 2021

Sterilization, irreversible surgeries and chemical castrations - How religious right lies corrupts the conversation about trans children



This week,  Arkansas governor Asa Hutchinson vetoed the bill which would outlaw transgender healthcare for minors. And then by a simple majority, the state legislature overrode the veto, making Arkansas the first state to outlaw affirming healthcare for transgender children.

The Family Research Council sent out a press release celebrating what the Arkansas legislature did:

Today, Arkansas became the first state in the nation to enact legislation that prohibits gender transition procedures on minors, prevents taxpayer funds or medical insurance mandates to pay for them, and provides legal remedies for minors who have been permanently disfigured and/or sterilized by them.

 On Tuesday afternoon, in quick succession the Arkansas House (72-25) and Senate (25-8) overrode the governor's veto of the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act. Family Research Council praised the state legislature for its effort to protect minors. 

 Family Research Council President Tony Perkins released the following statement: "The SAFE Act's successful passage into law is a victory for children and their health and safety. The state of Arkansas has taken the lead in the race to protect children from a political movement that advocates for using off-label drugs and experimental procedures on minors. 

 "As the name implies, the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act protects minors from unscientific, experimental, and destructive gender transition procedures that interrupt their natural development and irreversibly alter their bodies. As a growing number of individuals come forward to share their stories of being permanently disfigured and/or sterilized, there is a growing and urgent need for other states to follow Arkansas' lead by protecting minors from life-altering procedures such as puberty-blocking drugs, cross-sex hormones, and irreversible surgeries. 

The  consistent repetition  of phrases like "life altering procedures" and "irreversible surgeries" and words like "disfigurement" and "sterilization" in FRC's press release isn't happenstance. It has been part of a deliberate attempt to "nauseate" instead of "educate" and exploit unfounded fears for a cynical purpose. By conjuring up false images of minors being forced to undergo surgeries altering their gender and given drugs which would permanently damage their health, those who have been pushing these anti-trans bills - like FRC - have been deliberately appealing to hysteria in a somewhat successful attempt to drown out the voices of the medical professionals who know better and the transgender youth who they falsely claim that they want to protect.

It's an old but highly successful tactic. 

'Middle-grade trans novel most challenged book for third consecutive year ' & other Wed midday news briefs




Middle-Grade Trans Novel Most Challenged Book for Third Year in a Row - For Pete's sake, folks.

Putin formally bans same-sex marriages in Russia - Don't you wish someone would ban Putin.

Senate OKs bill allowing opt-out of LGBT curriculum - Cause if children learn that LGBTQ people exist, they may want to become one . . . or something like that. . .

Tuesday, April 06, 2021

Former Congressional candidate launches into profanity-filled transphobic tirade after Dr. Phil taping

Angela Stanton-King 

Former Congressional candidate and Trump supporter Angela Stanton-King recently taped an episode of Dr. Phil and apparently it got ugly. Whatever happened led her to storm out of the taping and film the following vulgar, profanity-filled, transphobic tirade attacking Dr. Phil, his wife, and several other people.  Rumor control says that it had something do with her alleged transgender child.

 


Some - very few - have taken her side while attempting to portray her as a mother defending her child. However, based upon King's history of targeting LGBTQ people (such as labeling us as pedophiles which led to a blow-up between her and me last year), I doubt that she was defending her child.

If anything, her language makes another point about how dangerous it is for transgender children to thrive in a climate in which so many are willing to spout basic ignorance about transgender people in general  while targeting them with ugly legislation

Ms. King talks about common sense, but she obviously lacks it. Pick up a book, consult a medical expert when it comes to transgender people, especially transgender children. It's not difficult. Stop clinging to such rudimentary nonsense about body parts and such. There is so much accurate information out there.

Her tirade is humorous in its immaturity, but don't let the comical aspect of it blind you to the reality of how many people would rather immerse themselves in sad stupidity instead of getting facts about transgender people. 


Related posts:

'NY legislator resigns after ugly remark about putting gays on an island' & other Tue midday news briefs



NY Legislator Resigns After Furor Over Remarks About Gay People - The "put gays on an island and they will be gone in 40 years" guy resigned. I guess he will claim to be a "victim of cancel culture." 

Lil Nas X's 'Song About Gay Sex' Hits #1 on Billboard Hot 100 - Ben Shapiro is going to lose his mind.

Monday, April 05, 2021

Video - Randy Rainbow wrecks Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham over their 'sudden' concern about our border

To paraphrase a comment under this video, just because Trump is no longer in office doesn't mean Randy Rainbow has no more material to use. Thanks the GOP members of Congress, that is. In this particular video, Randy brutally calls out Senators Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham for their sudden concern about the situation at the border.  

Deliciously and unapologetically brutal, particularly to Graham.

'Anti-LGBTQ activists now funding voter suppression & anti-vaccine conspiracies' & other Mon midday news briefs

 

The Liberty Counsel's Mat Staver

Anti-LGBTQ activists are now funding voter suppression & anti-vaccine conspiracies - Grifters gotta grift. Not surprising at all. 

Former NFL coach on why she opposes Idaho law targeting transgender athletes - Katie Sowers, the first woman to coach a Superbowl game, has something to say about these awful bills and laws targeting transgender athletes. 


Sunday, April 04, 2021

Donnie McClurkin's struggles with his sexual orientation should earn no sympathy

Gospel singer Donnie McClurkin


Supposed ex-gay gospel singer Donnie McClurkin is in the news again.  He said that his personal struggles against homosexuality will lead him to be alone for the rest of his life.

 McClurkin, 61, had previously opened up years ago about his past struggles with homosexuality, which he called a “perversion,” and claimed that he was able to suppress his sexual orientation, citing his and many Christian churches’ stance on homosexuality as a sin. He admitted that he still had urges to be with men but chose not to. Comparing homosexuality to diabetes he said, “I don’t eat sugar, but it doesn’t mean that I don’t want sugar.”  

 . . . .“I didn’t know really what a woman wanted,” McClurkin said on Uncensored. “I’ve messed up more than I’ve had good. My past relationships were a sprinkling of everything – men and women.”

 “When things get rough I go back into my safe place – my music and my ministry,” he added. “Never having a long-term relationship in my life and never being married, I chalked that up. I will probably be alone for the rest of my life as far as a mate is concerned.”

I've never been a fan of his "testimony" about his so-called deliverance from homosexuality. But this new angle, this public mourning he is engaging in about his life has gotten me more perturbed at him.

McClurkin is a grown man. His sexual orientation is not a choice, but how he chooses to express it is a choice. He is alone because he chooses to be. And that is his personal decision, which I have no problem with.

What bothers me is how McClurkin has been vocal over the years about how homosexuality is a sin and how he is trying to help LGBTQ children and adults by supposedly steering them away it. He has made statements attesting this on television shows and in the pulpits. He sounded so sure of himself, so determined to "protect the children."

Now here he comes with this sob story about how he is having trouble with relationships and how he will probably be alone for the rest of his life.

That's a terrible message he is sending to LGBTQ people, particularly black LGBTQ youth -  Homosexuality is a sin. God doesn't you to be an LGBTQ person. And you should fight it even if it means you  are sentencing yourself to a lonely life.

To me, it all comes down to the fact that perhaps McClurkin should have settled his own life situation before he took it upon himself to be a crusader in other people's lives.  He's not that much of a credible messenger if his message embraces loneliness.  I feel very little sympathy for him, but my heart goes out to those who bought into his negative message about their God-given LGBTQ sexual orientation. His revelation of being a flawed messenger has to be devastating. Where do they turn now? Do they embrace the idea that homosexuality is a sin, but fighting against it will lead to a lonely life?

Do they question God's love and credibility if they accept McClurkin's message? Would a loving God lead them to have a life with no one to love? Or will they just say to hell with it all and just embrace melancholy in the face of choice McClurkin has presented to them? 

McClurkin seems to have forgotten the first rule of declaring yourself a leader and a public face of a movement - you don't have a personal life. Everything is public and the feelings you express are transcribed by those who follow you as directions of where they should go.

And with that in mind, McClurkin is sending his followers into a deep hole of despair.

Personally, I think McClurkin should find himself a good man with some good dick and have a good life. At the very least, he should take into account the messages he sends before the next time he opens his mouth.

Thursday, April 01, 2021

27 celebrities to remind you that religious right claims about the 'gay lifespan' is yet another lie

Readers of this blog know that one anti-gay myth I have combatted on many times is the idea that gay men generally have shorter life spans than heterosexual men. In the past, it was a popular and much repeated notion by religious right groups and personalities that "homosexuality takes years off of your life."  The ages in which we supposedly died varied, but it always before we were 50. This notion became less popular when folks like myself revealed that the notion sprung from junk science and cherry-picked studies. 

Still, you know how the religious right is. They never let go of what they consider a good homophobic lie. Outright claims about "shortened gay lives" have given way to vague inferences that it is impossible to have a long and fruitful life if you are a gay man.

The video above should be a reminder that such claim, like so many other claims of the religious right, is a big fat lie.

'Proposed law would make businesses post signs saying they allow trans people to use the bathroom' & other Thur midday news briefs



Proposed law would make businesses post signs saying they allow trans people to use the bathroom - I'm undecided about this.

North Carolina Democrats call for state to pass LGBTQ package - It would be interesting if this became a reality. 



Wednesday, March 31, 2021

YouTube allowing discredited anti-trans author and Prager U to fundraise off encouraging parents to reject their transgender children

Discredited author Abigail Shrier continues to declare war on transgender children

According to Media Matters, YouTube is doing the transgender community a huge disservice by allowing groups and individuals to fundraise on the message that parents should reject their transgender children. And in doing so, YouTube is ignoring its own community guidelines:

YouTube is helping right-wing propaganda network PragerU to fundraise off of a March 29 video titled “Why Girls Become Boys,” which spreads disinformation about trans youth and health care -- despite YouTube’s Community Guidelines that include protections for trans people. 

The video features anti-trans author Abigail Shrier suggesting that young trans people are not actually trans and that parents should reject their trans kids’ gender identities. Shrier is a major player in the crusade against the rights of trans youth and wrote a book misinforming about trans youth called Irreversible Damage. She also recently testified before the Senate against the Equality Act and has made multiple appearances on Fox News to lie about trans people. 

 The new video with Shrier uses the YouTube Giving program and has earned more than 285,000 views in one day and -- alongside other videos in PragerU’s fundraising campaign on the platform -- has raised more than $51,000. The YouTube Giving Program’s rules say that nonprofits must follow the platform’s Community Guidelines, which supposedly protect trans people. In fact, YouTube has previously removed videos from PragerU and other channels that spread harmful disinformation about trans people, including suggestions that they have a mental illness. 

Shrier, whose book was called out for several distortions (including presenting false anti-trans statistics) has absolutely no expertise in transgender healthcare.

'LGBTQ students file class-action lawsuit against Department of Education' & other Wed midday news briefs.

 


LGBTQ students file class-action lawsuit against Department of Education - Well alright! Sock it to them! Sorry but no taxpayer funding for religious schools who discriminate against LGBTQ people.

Biden administration scraps Trump's anti-LGBTQ agenda abroad - Hell yeah I'm happy I voted for Joe Biden. 


Tuesday, March 30, 2021

Unverified horror stories about trans youth helping to pass anti-transgender legislation



In 1981, a now discredited homophobic researcher by the name of Paul Cameron made up a story about a child being dragged into a bathroom, raped and then mutilated by gay man.  He told this story while speaking against a pro-gay ordinance in Omaha, NB. Police investigated but couldn't find any assault. But Cameron repeated the story and subsequently, the ordinance was defeated by a large margin.

Fast forward to 2021 in Arkansas where the state legislature just passed a bill preventing trans children from receiving affirming healthcare. The state did this based upon the lie that transgender children are receiving gender-transitioning surgeries and taking dangerous hormones. 

In bragging about this, anti-LGBTQ hate group the Family Research Council sent out the following tweet detailing how a legislator told the story of a trans boy allegedly receiving a double mastectomy and then regretting it:




You'll notice that FRC did not include any details nor did the legislator in question, Alan Clark. Though if you read Clark's twitter feed, you would see that he is a fan of sending out paranoid tweets about President Biden's son Hunter, conspiracies about COVID, and arguments claiming that global warming isn't real.

In other words, a basic far-right smorgabord of hysteria and paranoia. Of course though FRC has never been one for caring about the veracity of its sources or said sources' claims if the group can exploit them both.

And this particular story is a doozy. I had to google but I think I found what FRC and Clark was alluding to - an article called Double Mastectomy at 15, Detrans 16-Year-Old Now Seeks Reversal

It's the alleged story of a 16-year-old transgender boy, Penny Cunningham, who is detransitioning. Penny supposedly got a double mastectomy in Pennsylvania at 15 and was seeking funds via gofundme for a breast reconstruction. The article was published on July 10, 2020 in an online publication called The Velvet Chronicle

The Velvet Chronicle seems to have a very serious problem with the transgender community.  It pushes the idea that transgender youth are actually  "nonconforming youth" bullied into being labeled as transgender. It also embraces the strange notion that lesbian voices are being replaced, particularly by transgender voices. In its attempts to prove  these beliefs, the publication freely throws out phrases like "gay eugenics," "gender vultures,"  or "medicalized gay conversion therapy."  In other words, the same type who likes to use phrases like "women's space" as if  disguising their prejudices in intellectually esoteric terms makes them more palpable.  A polite way to refer to  The Velvet Chronicle would be to call it a "maddening mess of unbridled and ignorant TERFdom," but that's another matter entirely.

In this particularly case, the story of this alleged detransitioner should raise a lot of eyebrows. I broke down several problems with it.


1. From Penny's claim, the medical professionals in question may have acted illegally  or unethically but Penny doesn't give any information to further an investigation. 

2. Penny is incredibly vague about everything in the story. There is no way anyone can verify if Penny is who he or she says they are or what hospital the alleged mastectomy took place

3. Where there are gaps in Penny's story, The Velvet Chronicle fills in with quite a bit anti-transgender propaganda.

4. Except for a few tweets and links on far-right or anti-transgender webpage (all echoing the article from The Velvet Chronicle and linking  Penny's now defunct gofundme page), there is no more information about Penny. As far as I have seen, there is no knowledge of whether or not Penny was successful with the fundraising or what they are doing in the present. The Velvet Chronicle did no follow-up.

Of course what I found thus far is not meant to be disrespectful.  The truth may be in fact that Penny does exist and that the story told is accurate, including the claim about the mastectomy. But as of now, it doesn't look that way.

It looks as if the religious right hasn't veered from fear tactics about LGBTQ people. What worked in 1982 seems to be working in 2021. And this time, they got help from folks within our community. And that is really scary.

Related posts:

'

'Lil Nas X's trolling of religious right makes his shoes a huge seller' & other Tue midday news briefs

Lil Nas X

For years, the religious right used outrage against us to fundraise and sell their message. Turnabout, as they say . . .